Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Migration Experience in Migrants’ Destination Choice Cover

The Role of Migration Experience in Migrants’ Destination Choice

IZA Journal of Development and Migration
Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Bartel, A. P. (1989): Where do the New US Immigrants Live? Journal of Labor Economics 7(4), 371-391.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bauer T.; G. S. Epstein; I. N. Gang (2005): Enclaves, Language, and the Location Choice of Migrants. Journal of Population Economics 18(4), 649-662.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bauer, T.; G. S. Epstein; I. N. Gang (2007): The Influence of Stocks and Flows on Migrants’ Location Choices, in: Polachek, S. W.; O. Bargain (eds.) Aspects of Worker Well-Being (Research in Labor Economics, Volume 26), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 199-229.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bauer, T.; G. S. Epstein; I. N. Gang (2009): Measuring Ethnic Linkages Among Migrants. International Journal of Manpower 30(1/2), 56-69.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Beine, M.; F. Docquier; Ç. Özden (2015): Dissecting Network Externalities in International Migration. Journal of Demographic Economics 81(4), 379-408.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Beine, M., S. Salomone (2013): Network Effects in International Migration: Education Versus Gender. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115(2), 354-380.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Borjas, G. J. (2006): Native Internal Migration and the Labor Market Impact of Immigration. Journal of Human Resources 41(2), 221-258.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Chiswick, B. R.; P. W. Miller (2004): Where Immigrants Settle in the United States. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 6(2), 185-197.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Chiswick, Barry. R.; Paul W. Miller (2005): Do Enclaves Matter in Immigrant Adjustment? City & Community 4(1): 5-35.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Choudinovskikh, O.; M. Denissenko (2013): Migration Between CIS Countries: Trends and Policy, in: Series Search Working Paper, WP3/06, Universitat de Barcelona. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/WP_3_6.pdf Accessed 26 February 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cushing, B. (2007): Conditional logit, IIA, and Alternatives for Estimating Models of Interstate Migration.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Dahlberg, M.; M. Eklöf (2003): Relaxing the IIA Assumption in Locational Choice Models: A Comparison Between Conditional Logit, Mixed Logit, and Multinomial Probit Models. Nationalekonomiska institutionen.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Damm, A. P. (2009): Ethnic Enclaves and Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes: Quasi-Experimental Evidence. Journal of Labor Economics 27(2), 281-314.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Danzer, A. M.; B. Dietz (2018): Migrants’ Well-Being During the Global Financial Crisis: Economic and Social Predictors. Journal of Comparative Economics 46(3), 770-787.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Danzer, A.; O. Ivaschenko (2010): Migration Patterns in a Remittances Dependent Economy: Evidence from Tajikistan during the Global Financial Crisis. Migration Letters 7(2), 190-202.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Davis, B.; G. Stecklov; P. Winters (2002): Domestic and International Migration from Rural Mexico: Disaggregating the Effects of Network Structure and Composition. Population Studies 56(3), 291-309.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Denisenko, M.; E. Chernina (2017): The Migration of Labor and Migrant Incomes in Russia. Problems of Economic Transition 59(11-12), 886-908.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Edin, P. A.; P. Fredriksson; O. Åslund (2004): Settlement Policies and the Economic Success of Immigrants. Journal of Population Economics 17(1), 133-155.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Jaeger, D. A. (2000): Local Labor Markets, Admission Categories, and Immigrant Location Choice. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Jaeger, D. A. (2007): Green Cards and the Location Choices of Immigrants in the United States, 1971–2000, in Chiswick, B. R. (ed.) Immigration (Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 27). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 131-183.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kaushal, N.; R. Kaestner (2010): Geographic Dispersion and Internal Migration of Immigrants. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization 8, 137-173.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Kerr, S. P.; W. R. Kerr (2011): Economic Impacts of Immigration: A Survey. Finnish Economic Papers. Finnish Economic Association 24(1), 1-32.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Kröger, A.; K. Meier (2011): Employment and the Financial Crisis: Evidence from Tajikistan, in: Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, 2011 50, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kumo, K. (2012): Tajik labour migrants and their remittances: Is Tajik migration pro-poor? Post-Communist Economies, 24(1), 87-109.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Longhi, S.; P., Nijkamp; J. Poot (2008): Meta-Analysis of Empirical Evidence on the Labour Market Impact of Immigration. Region et Developpement 27, 161-191.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Marat, E. (2009): Shrinking Remittances Increase Labor Migration from Central Asia. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Analyst 11, 7-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia (2007): Order No 185, March 22, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia (2008a): Order No 73n, February 18, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia (2008b): Order No 777n, December 26, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia (2009): Order No 1008n, December 22, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia (2010): Order No 1080n, December 8, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Mocetti, S.; C. Porello (2010): How does Immigration Affect Native Internal Mobility? New Evidence from Italy. Regional Science and Urban Economics 40(6), 427-439.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Olimova, S.; I. Bosc (2003): Labour Migration from Tajikistan. Dushanbe: International Organization for Migration. http://iom.tj/pubs/Labor_Migration_Eng.pdf Accessed 26 February 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Pena, A. A. (2009): Locational Choices of the Legal and Illegal: The Case of Mexican Agricultural Workers in the US. International Migration Review 43(4), 850-880.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Russian State Statistical Committee (2011): Trud i Zanyatost v Rossii. 2011: stat.sb. [Work and employment in Russia. 2011: Statistic Book]. Moscow, 637. Available at: http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1139916801766 Accessed 13 November 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Russian State Statistical Committee (2018a): Data. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from Russian State Statistical Committee. http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=11
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Russian State Statistical Committee (2018b): Data. Russian State Statistical Committee. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/perepis_itogi1612.htm Accessed 15 December 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Russian State Statistical Committee (2018c): Data. Russian State Statistical Committee, Regions of Russia. Socio-Economic Indicators. http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156 Accessed 13 November 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Russian State Statistical Committee (2018d): Data. Russian State Statistical Committee, Regions of Russia. Main Characteristics of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation. http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138625359016 Accessed 13 November 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Russian State Statistical Committee (2019): Data. https://gks.ru/accounts Accessed 13 November 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Schneider, L., A. Kubis (2009): Are there Gender-Specific Preferences for Location Factors? A Grouped Conditional Logit-Model of Interregional Migration Flows in Germany (No. 5/2009): IWH Discussion Papers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Scott, D. M.; P. A. Coomes; A. I. Izyumov (2005): The Location Choice of Employment-based Immigrants among US Metro Areas. Journal of Regional Science 45(1), 113-145.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Shemyakina, O. (2011a): The Effect of Armed Conflict on Accumulation of Schooling: Results from Tajikistan. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 186-200.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Shemyakina, O. N. (2011b): The Labor Market, Education and Armed Conflict in Tajikistan, in: Policy Research Working Paper, No 5738, The World Bank.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. State Statistical Agency of Tajikistan (2007): Tajikistan Living Standards Survey (TLSS) 2007. Ref. TJK_2007_TLSS_v01_M. Dataset downloaded from http://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/72
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. State Statistical Agency of Tajikistan (2009): Tajikistan Living Standards Survey (TLSS) 2009. Ref. TJK_2009_TLSS_v01_M. Dataset downloaded from http://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/72
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Tajikistan Household Panel Survey (2011): Institute for East and Southeast European Studies, Regensburg. http://doi.org/<a href="https://doi.org/10.15457/thps_2011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15457/thps_2011</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Word Bank (2007): Migration and Development Brief 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Word Bank (2008): Migration and Development Brief 8. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Word Bank (2009a): Migration and Development Brief 10. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. World Bank (2009b): Russian Economic Report (English). Russia Economic Report; No. 20. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/678311468306534253/Russian-economic-report
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Word Bank (2018): Data. World Development Indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org Accessed 26 November 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Zavodny, M. (1999): Determinants of Recent Immigrants’ Locational Choices. International Migration Review 33(4), 1014-1030.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/izajodm-2020-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2520-1786
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Published on: Feb 3, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Russia,
Tajikistan,
international migration,
labor migration,
location choice
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Microeconomics,
Macroeconomics,
Economic policy,
Mathematics and statistics for economists,
Econometrics

© 2020 Eugenia M. Chernina, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article