Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of acute toxicity of vinasse by means of Daphnia magna and Aliivibrio fischeri: a comparative study Cover

Evaluation of acute toxicity of vinasse by means of Daphnia magna and Aliivibrio fischeri: a comparative study

Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Barba-Ho LE, García LA. (2012). Evaluación de la factibilidad de acople de un sistema fotocatalítico biológico para el tratamiento de vinazas mediante estudios de toxicidad (Evaluation of the coupling feasibility of a biological photocatalytic system for the treatment of vinasse through toxicity studies). EIDENAR11: 63–71.
  2. Choeisai P, Jitkam N, Silapanoraset K, Yubolsai C, Yoochatchava, W, Yamaguchi T, Onodera T, Syutsubo K. (2014). Sugarcane molasses-based bio-ethanol wastewater treatment by two-phase multi-staged up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) combination with up-flow UASB and down-flow hanging sponge. Water Sci Technol69: 1174–1180.10.2166/wst.2013.794
  3. Choi K, Meier PG. (2001). Toxicity evaluation of metal plating wastewater employing the Microtox® Assay: A comparison with cladocerans and fish. Environ Toxicol16: 136–141.10.1002/tox.1017
  4. Christofoletti CA, Pedro-Escher J, Fontanetti CS. (2013). Assessment of the genotoxicity of two agricultural residues after processing by diplopods using the Allium cepa assay. Water Air Soil Pollut224: 1–14.10.1007/s11270-013-1523-3
  5. Da Silva-Souza TS, Hencklein FA, De Angelis DF, Fontanetti CS. (2013). Clastogenicity of landfarming soil treated with sugar cane vinasse. Environ Monit Assess 185: 1627–1636.10.1007/s10661-012-2656-3
  6. EPA. (2002). Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. Fifht edition, Washington, DC.
  7. España-Gamboa E, Mijangos-Cortes J, Barahona-Perez L, Dominguez-Maldonado J, Hernández-Zarate G, Alzate-Gaviri L. (2011). Vinasse: characterization and treatments. Waste Manag Res29: 1235–1250.10.1177/0734242X1038731321242176
  8. Figaro S, Louisy-Louis S, Lambert J, Ehrhardt JJ, Ouensanga A, Gaspard S. (2006). Adsorption studies of recalcitrans compounds of molasses spent-wash on activated carbons. Water Res40: 3459–3466.10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.03716987542
  9. Finney DJ. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Formagini EL, Marques FR, Serejo ML, Paulo PL, Boncz MA. (2014). The use of microalgae and their culture medium for biogas production in an integrated cycle. Water Sci Technol69: 941–946.10.2166/wst.2013.80324622540
  11. Grossi-Botelho R, Tornisielo VL, Alves de Olinda R, Maranho L A, Machado-Neto L. (2012). Acute toxicity of sugarcane vinasse to aquatic organisms before and after pH adjustment. Toxicol Environ Chem94: 2035–2045.10.1080/02772248.2012.738516
  12. Guerreiro LF, Rodrigues CS, Duda RM, de Oliveira RA, Boaventura RA, Madeira LM. (2016). Treatment of sugarcane vinasse by combination of coagulation/flocculation and Fenton’s oxidation. J Environ Manage181: 237–248.10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.02727353374
  13. ISO 11348. (2007). Water quality - Determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test). Part 3: Method using freeze-dried bacteria.
  14. ISO 6341. (2012). Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea)-Acute toxicity test.
  15. Jimenez AM, Borja R, Martín A. (2003). Aerobic-anaerobic biodegradation o beet molasses alcoholic fermentation wastewater. Process Biochem38: 1275–1284.10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00325-4
  16. Kumar S, Gopal K. (2001). Impact of distillery effluent on physiological consequences in the freshwater teleost Channa punctatus. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol66: 617–622.10.1007/s001280053
  17. Marques SS, Nascimento IA, Almeida PF, Chinalia, FA. (2013). Growth of Chlorella vulgaris on Sugarcane Vinasse: The Effect of Anaerobic Digestion Pre-treatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol171: 1933–1943.10.1007/s12010-013-0481-y
  18. Morales A, Larrahondo J, Victoria H, Jaramillo A. (2000). Compuestos orgánicos en vinaza (Organic compounds in vinasse). Carta trimestral3: 5–6.
  19. Naik NM, Jagadeesh KS, Alagawadi AR. (2008). Microbial decolorization of spentwash: a review. Indian J Microbiol48: 41–48.10.1007/s12088-008-0005-6
  20. Nitayavardhana S, Issarapayup K, Pavasan, P, Khanal SK. (2013). Production of protein-rich fungal biomass in an airlift bioreactor using vinasse as substrate. Bioresour Technol133: 301–306.10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.073
  21. OECD. (2004). Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  22. Parnaudeau V, Condom N, Oliver R, Cazevieille P, Recous S. (2008). Vinasse organic matter quality and mineralization potential, as influenced by raw material, fermentation and concentration processes. Bioresour Technol99: 1553–1562.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.012
  23. Paz-Pino OL, Barba-Ho LE, Marriaga-Cabrales N. (2014). Tratamiento de vinazas acoplando electrodisolución, heterocoagulación y digestión anaerobia (vinasse treatment by coupling of electro dissolution, heterocoagulation and anaerobic digestion). DYNA81: 102–107.10.15446/dyna.v81n187.38922
  24. Pedrosa EMR, Rolim MM, Albuquerque PHS, Cunha AC. (2005). Supressivi-dade de nematóides em cana-de-açucar por adição de vinhaça ao solo (Suppressivity of nematodes in sugarcane by adding vinasse to soil). Re-vista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental9: 197–201.10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v9nsupp197-201
  25. Romanholo-Ferreira LF, Aguiar MM, Messias TG, Pompeu GB, Lopez AM, Silva DP, Monteiro RT. (2011). Evaluation of sugar-cane vinasse treated with Pleurotus sajor-caju utilizing aquatic organisms as toxicological indicators. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf74: 132–137.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.042
  26. Rodrigues ES, Umbuzeiro GA. (2011). Integrating toxicity testing in the waste-water management of chemical storage terminals - a proposal based on a ten-year study. J Hazard Mater186: 1909–1915.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.083
  27. Srivastava S, Jain R. (2010). Effect of distillery spent wash on cytomorphological behaviour of sugarcane settlings. J Environ Biol31: 809–812.
  28. Sydney EB, Larroche C, Novak AC, Nouaille R, Sarma SJ, Brar SK, Letti LA Jr, Soccol VT, Soccol CR. (2014). Economic process to produce biohydrogen and volatile fatty acids by a mixed culture using vinasse from sugarcane ethanol industry as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol159: 380–386.10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.042
  29. Vélasquez-Riaño M, Lombana-Sánchez N, Villa-Restrepo AF, Fernández-Calle EP. (2013). Cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter kakiaceti GM5 in two batch process using vinasse as culture media. Water Sci Technol68: 1079–1084.10.2166/wst.2013.347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2019-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1337-9569 | Journal ISSN: 1337-6853
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 148
Submitted on: Sep 3, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 24, 2019
Published on: Feb 20, 2020
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology & Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Möritz Velásquez-Riaño, Juan Sebastían Meneses-Sánchez, Carel Elizabeth Carvajal Arias, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology & Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.