References
- Adams R, Simmons D, Hartskeerl K, Koehler M. (2004). Surviving suppression: no detectable impacts of Class A foam on soil invertebrates and some Australian native plants. Bushfi re 2004: earth, wind & fi re: fusing the elements: conference proceedings, Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, South Australia.
- Domene X, Colon J, Uras MV, Izquierdo R, Avila A, Alcaniz JM. (2010). Role of soil properties in sewage sludge toxicity to soil collembolans. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 1982 - 1990.
- Fiskesjo, G. (1985). The Allium test as standard in environmental monitoring.
- Hereditas 102: 99-112. Globally Harmonized System of Classifi cation and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), United Nations, 2005.
- Hamilton SJ, McDonald SF, Gaikowski MP, Buhl KJ. (1996). Toxicity of fi re retardant chemicals to aquatic organisms: Progress report. Information Report - Petawawa National Forestry Institute PI X. 123; pp. 132-144.
- Hirzel J, Matus I. (2013). Eff ect of soil depth and increasing fertilization rate on yield and its components of two durum wheat varieties. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 73: 55-59.
- Hřibova Š, Zlamalova Gargošova H, Vavrova M. (2014). Ecotoxicological evaluation of fi refi ghting foams. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin (in press).
- ISO, 2005. Water quality - Determination of toxic effect of water constituents and waste to duckweed (Lemna minor) - Duckweed growth inhibition test. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO 20079.
- ISO, 2007. Soil Quality. Leaching Procedures for Subsequent Chemical and Ecotoxicological Testing of Soil and Soil Materials. Part 2. Bath Test Using a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 l/kg Dry Matter. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO 21268-2.
- Johnson AI. (1963). A Field Method for Measurement of Infi ltration. U. S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1544-F. p. F1-F27.
- Koehler M, Adams R, Simmons D. (2005). Does application of fi refi ghting foam aff ect soil invertebrates? Victorian naturalist 122: 128-133.
- Lors C, Ponge JF, Martinez Aldaya M, Damidot D. (2011) Comparison of solid and liquid-phase bioassays using ecoscores to asses contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 159: 2974-2981.
- Vavřiček D, Kučera A. (2014). Lesnicka pedologie pro posluchače LDF Mendelu v Brně. Ustav geologie a pedologie. p. 176.
- LUFA Speyer [webpage on the Internet]. Analyses Data Sheet. Speyer, Germany: LUFA Speyer [updated 2013 May; cited 2014, Aug]. Available form: http://www.lufa-speyer.de/images/stories/bodanalyse.pdf
- Methodological guideline of Department of Waste to determine the ecotoxicity of waste, Bulletin of the Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, part 4, April 2007.
- Mijangos I, Garbisu C. (2010). Consequences of soil sampling depth during the assessment of the eff ects of tillage and fertilization on soil quality: a common oversight. Soil and TillageResearch 109: 169-173.
- Olorunfemi DI, Ogunsanwo MW. (2011). Evaluation of the diff erential growth conditions, heavy metal composition and cytogenetics of allium cepa by the use of chromosome aberration bioassay. Science World Journal 6: 21-25.
- Ruggiero P, Pizzigallo MDR, Crecchio C. (2002). Eff ects of soil abiotic processes on the bioavailability of anthropogenic organic residues, in Ecological signifi cance of the interactions among clay minerals, organic matter and soil biota pp. 95-133, Elsevier Science B.V.
- Seow J. (2013) Environmental Considerations When Using Fire Fighting Foam in Fire Fighting Foams with Perfl uorochemicals - Environmental Review pp. 22-27.