Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Neuroimaging Valuation of Post-Stroke Angiogenesis Andneuroplasticity: A Narrative Review Cover

Neuroimaging Valuation of Post-Stroke Angiogenesis Andneuroplasticity: A Narrative Review

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Choi EK, Jung YH, Lee JH, et al. Elevated risk of stroke in young adults after traumatic brain injury: A nationwide cohort study of 1 million people. J Stroke. 2024;26 (1):131–140.
  2. Hsia AW, Mlynash M, Christensen S, et al. Rapid ADC evolution after early reperfusion: A subset of “rapidly reversible” diffusion lesion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(1):51–57.
  3. Soares BP, Tong E, Hom J, et al. Reperfusion and salvage of the ischemic penumbra: A prospective comparison of CT and MRI. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(4):684–690.
  4. Burgin WS, Malkoff MD, Felberg RA, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound criteria for recanalization after thrombolysis for middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(5):1128–1132.
  5. Yang Q, Tress BM, Barber PA, et al. Serial study of apparent diffusion coefficient and anisotropy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2382–2390.
  6. Chen YH, Kang JH, Lin HC. Patients with traumatic brain injury: Population- based study suggests increased risk of stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(10):2733–2739.
  7. Kowalski RG, Haarbauer-Krupa J, Bell JM, et al. Acute ischemic stroke after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):236–243.
  8. Soares BP, Tong E, Mohamed FB, et al. MR and CT monitoring of recanalization, reperfusion, and penumbra salvage. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008;18(3):331–349.
  9. Katz-Dwyer J, Taylor C, Lew HL. Stroke: Another delayed hazard of traumatic brain injury—even in young adults. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(2):89–92.
  10. Posner JB, Plum F. Newer techniques of cerebral blood flow measurement. Arch Neurol. 1972;26(6):393–402.
  11. Dahl A, Russell D, Nyberg-Hansen R, et al. A comparison of regional cerebral blood flow and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities. Stroke. 1992;23(1):15–19.
  12. Adib-Samii P, Briley D, Martin RJ, et al. Imaging in ischemic stroke. Pract Neurol. 2016;16(6):447–454.
  13. Li F, Wang Y, Luo Y, et al. A systematic review of angiogenesis and neuroplasticity in stroke. Front Neurol. 2021;12:582605.
  14. Schneider AL, Gottesman RF, Mosley T, et al. Traumatic brain injury and long- term risk of stroke among U.S. military veterans. Neurology. 2023;101(18):e1793–e1803.
  15. Heye AK, Culling RD, Valdés Hernández MC, et al. Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using DCEMRI in a post-stroke model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;146:105071.
  16. Burgin WS, Malkoff MD, Felberg RA, et al. Criteria for MCA recanalization on TCD. Stroke. 2000;31(5): 1128–1132.
  17. Hoyer C, Ebert A, Hanke R, et al. fMRI and TMS for predicting stroke recovery. Brain Res Bull. 2023;198: 104–113.
  18. Sozda CN, Brus-Ramer M, Shereen AD, et al. Multimodal imaging in stroke: Clinical and research applications. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41(6):1241–1260.
  19. Yang S, Zhang L, Jia M, et al. Diffusion MRI in stroke: Microstructural integrity and outcome prediction. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1134588.
  20. Hiraga A, Fujihara K. Imaging biomarkers of stroke recovery. Neurol Int. 2024;16(1):6–13.
  21. Burgin WS, Malkoff MD, Felberg RA, et al. TCD ultrasound for thrombolysis monitoring. Stroke. 2000;31(5):1128–1132.
  22. Chavko M, Adeeb N, Ni WW, et al. Imaging middle cerebral artery blood flow: Importance of measuring vessel diameter. Physiol Rep. 2020;8(4):e14395.
  23. Yang S, Wang D, Zhang L, et al. Reperfusion dynamics via ASL imaging. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5634.
  24. Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Li L, et al. Non-invasive imaging of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. Brain Behav. 2022;12: e2512.
  25. Araki T, Yamada K, Yamashita F, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in stroke patients: A review. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(9):e3936.
  26. Kang DW, Latour LL, Chalela JA, et al. Early diffusionweighted imaging lesions and reversible ischemia. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2310–2313.
  27. Ciangă C, Stănilă C. Stroke-related imaging assessment protocols. Wiener Neurol Mag. 2021;21(Suppl 1):48–56.
  28. Sanz-Cortés M, Yeom KW, Wapner RJ, et al. Arterial spin labeling in pediatric neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(10):2020–2027.
  29. Thiel A, Vahdat S. Functional MRI markers of neuroplasticity after stroke. NeuroImage. 2015;131:14–24.
  30. Rehme AK, Grefkes C. Cerebral network reorganization after stroke. Neuroscientist. 2013;19 5):509–518.
  31. Soares BP, Tong E, Rordorf G, et al. Imaging penumbra salvage using perfusion MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(8):1452–1461.
  32. Blasi V, Lebedev AV, Vella G, et al. ASL perfusion as a surrogate for angiogenic response. J Neuroimaging. 2023;33(3):432–440.
  33. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, et al. Functional reorganization after stroke: fMRI evidence. Ann Neurol. 1993;33(2):181–189.
  34. Grefkes C, Ward NS. Cortical reorganization after stroke—mechanisms and implications. Brain. 2014;137(5):1224–1236.
  35. Rosso C, Valabregue R, Attal Y, et al. fMRI and EEG in post-stroke motor recovery. Brain Topogr. 2014;27(4):493–507.
  36. Zappasodi F, Tecchio F, Marzetti L, et al. Cortical reorganization in early stroke recovery. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 4):1284–1296.
  37. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, et al. Dynamic functional reorganization in motor recovery. NeuroImage. 2010;49(3):2526–2532.
  38. Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, et al. Stages of motor recovery post- stroke. Brain. 2008;131(3): 602–616.
  39. Park CH, Chang WH, Ohn SH, et al. Longitudinal changes in resting-state connectivity. Stroke. 2011;42(3):802–808.
  40. Ward NS. Functional reorganization after stroke: fMRI insights. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(4):382–388.
  41. Nudo RJ. Recovery after damage to motor cortex: Neuroplasticity mechanisms. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(4):33–40.
  42. Li X, Morgan PS, Ashburner J, et al. DTI and outcome prediction in stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(7):714–719.
  43. Puig J, Blasco G, Schlaug G, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as a biomarker for motor recovery. Neurology. 2017;88(21):2051–2058.
  44. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, et al. Interhemispheric connectivity predicts outcome. Stroke. 2008;39(1):243–250.
  45. Yin D, Song F, Xu D, et al. Patterns of functional connectivity in stroke recovery. PLoS One. 2012;7(8): e43114.
  46. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(9): 503–512.
  47. Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, et al. fMRI-guided rehabilitation: Case study. Front Neurol. 2019;10:21.
  48. Nicolo P, Guggisberg AG. EEG-based neuroplasticity measures post-stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131 (1):70–83.
  49. Guggisberg AG, Koch PJ, Hummel FC, et al. Brain networks and neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019; 37(1):1–12.
  50. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Disruption of interhemispheric balance post-stroke. Brain Struct Funct. 2011;216(2): 149–160.
  51. Kim BJ, Han MK, Park TH, et al. Functional MRI in patients with dual pathology: stroke and TBI. J Neurol Sci. 2021;426:117486.
  52. Caplan LR, Biller J, Leary MC. Challenges in interpreting neuroimaging in patients with multiple brain injuries. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(6):609–618.
  53. Monti MM, Schnakers C, Korb AS, et al. Neuroplasticity in disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(6):564–576.
  54. Mutch CA, Talbott JF, Gean A. Imaging evaluation of traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016;27(4):409–439.
  55. Niogi SN, Mukherjee P. Diffusion tensor imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(4):241–255.
  56. Faul M, Xu L,Wald MM, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. 2010.
  57. Bazarian JJ, Zhu T, Blyth B, et al. Subject-specific changes in brain white matter on diffusion tensor imaging after sports-related concussion. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(2):171–180.
  58. Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2013;246:35–43.
  59. Sharp DJ, Scott G, Leech R. Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(3):156–166.
  60. Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, et al. Position statement: definition of TBI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1637–1640.
  61. Warner MA, Youn TS, Davis T, et al. Regionally selective atrophy after TBI: a longitudinal study. Neurology. 2010;74(10):792–798.
  62. Bigler ED. Anterior and middle cranial fossa in traumatic brain injury: imaging. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;26(1):37–52.
  63. Zhou Y, Milham MP, Lui YW, et al. Default-mode network disruption in mild TBI. Radiology. 2012;265 (3):882–892.
  64. Shenton ME, Hamoda HM, Schneiderman JS, et al. A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in mild TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(3):E1–E18.
  65. Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(6):469–480.
  66. Kuceyeski A, Maruta J, Relkin N, et al. The Network Modification (NeMo) Tool: predicting brain connectivity disruptions after stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;3:73–82.
  67. Honey CJ, Thivierge JP, Sporns O. Can structure predict function in the human brain? Neuroimage. 2010;52(3):766–776.
  68. Carrera E, Tononi G. Diaschisis: past, present, future. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 9):2408–2422.
  69. Baldassarre A, Ramsey L, Siegel JS, et al. Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 2):325–341.
  70. Jang SH, Kwon HG. Neuroplasticity of the corticospinal tract after stroke: a review. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8(20):1946–1950.
  71. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Wang K, et al. Recovery of sensorimotor function after stroke depends on interhemispheric connectivity. J Neurosci. 2010;30(11):3964–3972.
  72. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, et al. Dynamic reorganization of motor networks after stroke. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 4):1224–1238.
  73. Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(37): 13848–13853.
  74. Brodtmann A, Werden E, Pardoe H, et al. Charting cognitive and neuroanatomical recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(5):651–661.
  75. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, et al. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 8):2527–2535.
  76. Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation after stroke: From neuroscience to clinical practice. Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;33(6):675–683.
  77. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, et al. Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology. 2010;74 (4):280–287.
  78. Schulz R, Park CH, Boudrias MH, et al. Assessing the integrity of corticospinal pathways from primary and secondary cortical motor areas after stroke. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2248–2251.
  79. Guggisberg AG, Nicolo P, Cohen LG, et al. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: The role of structural and functional connectivity. Brain. 2017;140(11): 3070–3081.
  80. Ward NS. Using MRI biomarkers to predict motor recovery after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28 (6):582–589.
  81. Jang SH. The role of the corticospinal tract in motor recovery in patients with stroke: A review. Neuro- Rehabilitation. 2009;24(3):285–290.
  82. Heiss WD, Kidwell CS. Imaging for prediction of functional outcome and assessment of recovery. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1195–1201.
  83. Lin DJ, Cloutier AM, Erler KS, et al. Corticospinal tract integrity and motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(6):877–888.
  84. Hillis AE, Barker PB, Beauchamp NJ, et al. Restoring cerebral perfusion improves language processing in patients with chronic stroke. Brain. 2001;124(Pt5): 1040–050.
  85. Grefkes C, Eickhoff SB, Nowak DA, et al. Connectivity analysis in stroke: Reorganization of the motor system. Neurology. 2008;71(6):418–426.
  86. Puig J, Pedraza S, Blasco G, et al. Acute damage to the posterior limb of the internal capsule on diffusion tensor tractography predicts motor outcome after a stroke.AmJ Neuroradiol. 2011;32(5):857–863.
  87. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Wang K, et al. Recovery of sensorimotor function after experimental stroke correlates with restoration of resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2010;30(11):3964–3972.
  88. Binkofski F, Seitz RJ, Arnold S, et al. Thalamic metabolism and corticocortical disconnection in the epileptic baboon model: A PET study. Brain. 1996;119(Pt 6):1877–1890.
  89. Kalinosky BT, Schindler-Ivens SM, Westlake KP. Reducing interhemispheric inhibition in chronic stroke through combined interventions. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:6874954.
  90. Cramer SC. Functional MRI in stroke recovery. Stroke. 2004;35(11 Suppl 1):2695–2698.
  91. Wittenberg GF, Schaechter JD. The neural basis of recovery after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22 (6):654–658.
  92. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 6):1371–1384.
  93. van Oers CA, Vink M, van Zandvoort MJ, et al. Contribution of the contralesional motor cortex to recovery after stroke. Neuroimage. 2008;40(3): 1561–1569.
  94. Favre I, Ballester BR, Deutsch JE. Technologysupported interventions for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):120.
  95. Mahajan A, Tsao JW. Neuroplasticity in post-stroke rehabilitation: From bench to bedside. Transl Stroke Res. 2020;11(6):937–951.
  96. Grefkes C, Ward NS. Cortical reorganization in acute and chronic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):876–885.
  97. Edwards D, Cortes M, Thickbroom GW, et al. Using neuroimaging to individualize TMS therapy for stroke rehabilitation: A position paper. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;15:535–547.
  98. Jadavji NM, Emmerson JT, Willmore WG, et al. Multimodal imaging and predictive modeling in stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101602.
  99. Lin DJ, Nedelec T, Musen M, et al. Brain connectomics and stroke recovery: Predicting outcomes with advanced analytics. Ann Neurol. 2020;88(4):651–664.
  100. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–448.
  101. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: Pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. 2004;363(9411):768–774.
  102. Hill MD, Hachinski V. Stroke treatment: Time is brain. Stroke. 1999;30(1):17–20.
  103. Grefkes C, Ward NS. Mechanisms of recovery after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8(8):393–403.
  104. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(12):1844–1848.
  105. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Predicting activities after stroke: What is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2011;6(4):325–332.
  106. Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 6):1591–1609.
  107. De Vries LS, Groenendaal F. Patterns of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Neuroradiology. 2010;52 (6):555–566.
  108. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Wang K, et al. Longitudinal tracking of brain reorganization after stroke: Resting-state fMRI correlates of motor recovery. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(7):776–786.
  109. Sleigh J, Harvey M, Voss L, et al. Cortical vasodilation and its link to neuronal activation in neuroimaging. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;236:110–118.
  110. Marchal G, Beaudouin V, Rioux P, et al. Prolonged misery perfusion in a case of stroke with penumbral tissue rescue. Stroke. 1996;27(10):1825–1831.
  111. Baron JC. Mapping the ischemic penumbra with PET. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1996;166:11–18.
  112. Puig J, Blasco G, Schlaug G, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker in stroke. Neurology. 2017;88(21):2051–2058.
  113. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, et al. Dynamic functional reorganization and recovery in post-stroke motor networks. Neuroimage. 2010;49(3):2526–2532.
  114. Crofts JJ, Higham DJ, Bosnell R, et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):161–169.
  115. Baldassarre A, Ramsey L, Hacker CL, et al. Functional connectivity in stroke: Predicting deficits and recovery. HumBrain Mapp. 2016;37(2):554–568.
  116. Rosenthal G, Beaumont A, van der Kouwe A, et al. Longitudinal white matter alterations in TBI. Brain Inj. 2022;36(1):76–85.
  117. Bigler ED. Traumatic brain injury, neuroimaging, and neurodegeneration. FrontHumNeurosci. 2013;7:395.
  118. Seifert TD, Evans RW. Traumatic brain injury and its evolving diagnostic challenges. Neurol Clin. 2016;34(3): 617–639.
  119. Le TH, Gean AD. Neuroimaging of TBI. Neurotherapeutics. 2009;6(1):5–17.
  120. Palacios EM, Sala-Llonch R, Junque C, et al. Longterm declarative memory deficits in diffuse TBI: Correlation with DTI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(7):700–708.
  121. Smith DH, Johnson VE, Stewart W. Chronic neuropathologies of single and repetitive TBI. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(5):556–565.
  122. Dancause N, Nudo RJ. Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury. Prog Brain Res. 2011; 192: 273–295.
  123. Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–360.
  124. Wittenberg GF, Rogers W, Macko RF. TMS as a biomarker for recovery potential. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(3):266–276.
  125. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Gauthier L, et al. The role of functional imaging in stroke rehabilitation. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:1–10.
  126. Corbetta M, Ramsey L, Callejas A, et al. Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron. 2015;85(5):927–941.
  127. McArthur DL, Alger JR, Etchepare M, et al. Brain tissue perfusion in TBI: Comparison of imaging techniques. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(11):1351–1363.
  128. Cramer SC. Repairing the human brain after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(5):549–560.
  129. Ward NS. Functional imaging insights into stroke recovery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111(7):665–673.
  130. Hara Y. Neurorehabilitation after stroke. Brain Nerve. 2015;67(12):1427–1436.
  131. Li S, Carmichael ST. Growth-associated gene expression after stroke: Indications for neurogenesis and angiogenesis. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(5):708–719.
  132. Saxena S, Kruyt ND, Donkor ES, et al. Stroke research and capacity building in low-income countries. Stroke. 2020;51(7):1951–1953.
  133. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after stroke. Brain Res Rev. 2001;36(2-3):202–208.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/inmed-2025-0325 | Journal eISSN: 1220-5818 | Journal ISSN: 1220-5818
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 28
Published on: Oct 17, 2025
Published by: Romanian Society of Internal Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2025 Andreea E. Lungu, Diandra Miftode, Daniel Stirbu, Costin G. Malureanu, Letitia E. Vlad, Raluca Roman, Cristina Furnica, published by Romanian Society of Internal Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.