3. Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(4):442–452. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.04113710.1136/ard.2005.041137
5. Carette, S., Graham, D., Little, H., Rubenstein, J. and Rosen, P. (1983), The natural disease course of ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 26: 186-190. doi:10.1002/art.1780260210660061510.1002/art.1780260210
7. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009;68:777-783.10.1136/ard.2009.108233
8. Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009;68:784-788.10.1136/ard.2008.101501
9. Lipton S, Deodhar A, 2012. The New ASAS Classification Criteria for Axial and Peripheral Spondyloarthritis. Int J Clin Rheumatol, pp. 7(6):675-682.10.2217/ijr.12.61
10. de Winter JJ, Paramarta JE, de Jong HM, et al. Peripheral disease contributes significantly to the level of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2019;5:e000802. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-00080210.1136/rmdopen-2018-000802