Isolating anti-D, anti-C, and anti-G in immunohematology: a method comparison
By: Oscar Luo and Hannah Johnson
Paid access
|Oct 2026❗ Available for purchase in USD only.
❗ Available for purchase in USD only.
References
- Allen FH, Tippett PA. A new Rh blood type which reveals the Rh antigen G. Vox Sang 1958;3:321–30.
- Wagner FF, Flegel WA. Review: the molecular basis of the Rh blood group phenotypes. Immunohematology 2004;20:23–36.
- Maley M, Babb R, Chapman CE, Fitzgerald J, Cavanagh G. Identification and quantification of anti-D, -C, and -G in alloimmunized pregnant women. Transfus Med 2001;11:443–6.
- Shirey RS, Mirabella DC, Lumadue JA, Ness PM. Differentiation of anti-D, -C, and -G: clinical relevance in alloimmunized pregnancies. Immunohematology 1997;37:493–6.
- Yesus YW, Akhter JE. Hemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-C and anti-G masquerading as anti-D. Am J Clin Pathol 1985;84:769–72.
- Hadley AG, Poole GD, Poole J, Anderson NA, Robson M. Haemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-G. Vox Sang 1996;71:108–12.
- Jernman R, Korhonen A, Haimila K, et al. Severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to anti-C+G. Immunohematology 2015;3:123–7.
- Lenkiewicz B, Zupanska B. Clinical significance of anti-G. Transfus Med 2002;12:221.
- Vos G. The evaluation of specific anti-G (CD) eluate obtained by a double absorption and elution procedure. Vox Sang 1960;5:472–8.
- Issitt PD, Anstee DJ. Applied blood group serology. 4th ed. Durham, NC: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1998: 350–1.
- Song DY, Shin DW, Yoon MS, Hong YJ, Kim H, Han KS. Clinical significance of anti-G alloantibody and serologic interpretation strategies for patients with an anti-C+D pattern: first report of anti-G alloantibody identification in Korea. Ann Lab Med 2018;38:280–92.
- Skov F. Observations of the number of available G (rhG, Rh 12) antigen sites on red cells. Vox Sang 1976;31:124–30.
- Mouro I, Colin Y, Gane P, et al. Molecular analysis of blood group Rh transcripts from a rGr variant. Br J Haematol 1996;93:472–4.
- Faas BHW, Beckers EAM, Simsek S, et al. Involvement of Ser103 of the rh polypeptides in G epitope formation. Transfusion 1996;36:506–11.
- Case J. Quantitative variation in the G antigen of the Rh blood group system. Vox Sang 1973;25:529–39.
- Avent ND, Reid ME. The Rh blood group system: a review. Blood 2000;95:375–87.
- Champagne K, Moulds MK. Autoadsorptions for the detection of alloantibodies—should polyethylene glycol be used? [Letter] Transfusion 1996;36:384.
- Leger RM, Garratty G. Evaluation of methods for detecting alloantibodies underlying warm autoantibodies. Transfusion 1999;39:11–6.
- Barron CL, Brown MB. The use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to enhance the adsorption of autoantibodies. Immunohematology 1997;13:119–22.
- Method 4-10. Polyethylene glycol adsorption procedure. In: Cohn CS, Delaney M, Johnston ST, Latz LM, Schwartz J, Eds. Technical manual: methods. 21st ed. Arlington, VA: AABB Press, 2023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2026-016 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 96 - 101
Published online: Oct 11, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Oscar Luo, Hannah Johnson, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.