Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results Cover

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results

Paid access
|Dec 2024

Abstract

Variant D antigens can cause variable serologic results when typing with Anti-D reagents. There is limited information regarding the ability of Anti-D reagents to differentiate between D variants defined by RHD genotyping. This study was performed to determine if a panel of 20 U.S. Food and Drug Administration–licensed Anti-D reagents can identify molecularly defined D variants. Red blood cells from 119 donors carrying variant RHD alleles were tested at immediate spin (IS) and/or by the indirect antiglobuin test (IAT) using conventional test tube and/or column agglutination technology. Reaction strength at IS and IAT was reviewed to determine whether a pattern of reactivity could be correlated with a specific D variant. Agglutination results from each sample with each Anti-D reagent were combined to assess overall reactivity. The sample set consisted of 21 D variants, based on prior RHD genotyping. Of these variants, nine categories had three or more samples used for analysis (N = 102); 25 RHD*01W.1, 15 RHD*01W.2, 14 RHD*01W.3, 17 RHD*09.01, 14 RHD*09.03, 4 RHD*01W.4, 23 RHD*07, 4 RHD*10.05, and 6 reference allele RHD*01. As expected, IS showed more negative or weak reactions, and IAT produced more positive reactions with 3+/4+ agglutination strength. RHD*01W.3 samples showed strongest reactivity at IS and IAT. Greatest variation in reactivity was observed with RHD*01W.2, showing weakest overall reactivity at IS. All weak D types had at least one sample that yielded a negative result and one sample with 4+ agglutination at IS. Although there were general patterns of reactivity for each variant tested, no one pattern defined all samples carrying the same RHD allele. This study demonstrated that even with 20 different Anti-D reagents, serologic testing alone is insufficient to define weak or partial D types, characterize the risk for alloanti-D, or determine candidacy for Rh immune globulin. The results illustrate how multiple Anti-D reagents can be used to identify samples that should be reflexed to molecular testing.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2024-022 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 165
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Crystal Theiler, Christine Lomas-Francis, Sunitha Vege, Marie-Claire Chevrier, Gabriel André Leiva-Torres, Margaret A. Keller, Katherine Kaherl, Trina Coppolino, Susan T. Johnson, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.