Research supporting service transformation: Family Drug and Alcohol Courts and understanding the factors that contribute to their success

Martin, Doug

doi:10.2478/ijtr-2023-0001

Abstract

Family Drug and Alcohol Courts (FDAC) were introduced to England in 2008 following their development in the USA. Pilots launched across the country adopted a family-based strategy with the aim to improve outcomes for children that live with parents who misuse substances or alcohol. The numbers of children entering the care system has increased with ‘subsequent new borns’ being a particular concern frequently becoming ‘looked after’ by the state at birth. This article will focus upon an initial phase of a study that tracked the establishment of an FDAC pilot. It reveals how the FDAC team collaborated with Judges and a diversity of professionals and parents to create conditions through which ground-breaking practice was forged. The environment created is unique as it is one fully set within the context of each family’s lived experience. Through this approach parents have become full participants in court proceedings as opposed to purely subject to them. As a result, significant numbers of children have remained with or been returned to their families.

References

Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (2012) Hidden Harm: Responding to the needs of children of problem drug users. London: HMSO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J., Robinson, M. (2007) Developing Multi-professional Teamwork for Integrated Children’s Services. Maidstone: McGraw-Hill.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broadhurst, K., Mason, K., Bidston, S., Alrouh, B., Morriss, L., McQuarrie, T., Palmer, M.,Shaw, M., Harwin, J. and Kershaw, S. (2017) Vulnerable Birth Mothers and Recurrent Care Proceedings. Lancaster: Nuffield Institute and Lancaster University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cameron, C., and Moss, P. Eds. (2011) Social Pedagogy and Working with Children and Young People: where care and education meet. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Champine, R.B., Matlin, S., Stambler, M.J. and Kraemer Tebes, J. (2018) Trauma Informed Family Practices: towards integrated and evidence based approaches. Journal of Child and Family Studies 27:2732-2743.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Children’s Commissioner for England (2018) A Crying Shame: a report by the Office of the Children’s Commissioner into vulnerable babies in England. London: HMSO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cooper C. (2017) ‘Drug treatment courts and their progeny: overcoming their winding trajectory to make the concept work for the long term’, International Journal for Court Administration 8(3), 1–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008) Think Family. London: HMSO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Department for Education (2018) Children looked after in England (including adoption), year ending 31 March 2018. London: HMSO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dolan, P., Canavan, J., and Brady, B. Connecting with Practice in the Changing Landscape of Family Support Training Child Care in Practice Vol. 12, No. 1, January 2006, 43-51.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frost, N. and Dolan, P. Eds. (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Global Family Welfare. Abingdon: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frost, N. and Robinson, M. (2004) Social work practice and identity in joined up teams: some findings from research. Social work and social sciences review. (11) 3,16-28.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glass, N. (1999). Sure Start: The Development of an Early Development of an Early Intervention Programmes for Young Children in the United Kingdom. Children and Society, 13, 257-264.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
H.M. Government (2018) Working Together to Safeguard Children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: HMSO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leadbetter, J., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Martin, D., Middleton, D., Popova, A., Warmington, P., Apostolov, A. and Brown, S. (2007) Professional learning within multi-agency children’s services: Researching into practice. Educational Research, 49 (1), 83-98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, D. (2016) Whatever happened to Extended Schools? The story of an ambitious education project. London: UCL Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, D. (2019) The Challenge of Developing the ‘New Public School’: learning from extended schools. FORUM. Volume 61 Number 2 2019, 251-25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mersky, J.P., Topitzes, J. and Britz, L. (2019) Promoting Evidence-Based, Trauma Informed Social Work Practice. Journal of Social Work Education Vol 55, No 4, 645-657.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webb, S., Broadhurst, K.[uni00A0]and[uni00A0]Mason, C.[uni00A0](2018)[uni00A0]Birth mothers returning to court: Can a developmental trauma lens inform practice with women at risk of repeat removal of infants and children?[uni00A0]In: Justice for children and families: A developmental perspective. Royal College of Psychiatrists, Cambridge, 59-67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Research supporting service transformation: Family Drug and Alcohol Courts and understanding the factors that contribute to their success

Abstract

Paradigm

My account