Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Figure 14:
Figure 15:
Figure 16:
Figure 17:
Comparative performance analysis of the proposed model along with the existing methods
| Model | R@1 (%) | R@5 (%) | R@10 (%) | MdR | MnR | RMSE | MAE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X-Pool | 45.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 8 | 50 | 2.5 | 1.75 |
| CAMoE + DSL | 50.0 | 58.0 | 62.0 | – | 50 | 3.0 | 1.75 |
| TEFAL [31] | 55.0 | 65.0 | 68.0 | 7 | 40 | 2.0 | 1.25 |
| TS2-Net [31] | – | – | – | 8 | – | – | – |
| Proposed model | 80.0 | 82.0 | 80.0 | 5 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.25 |