Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stability of Sensor Network based on Non-linear Data Analysis for in situ Leaching of Ionic Rare Earth Ore Bodies under Similar Simulation Experiments Cover

Stability of Sensor Network based on Non-linear Data Analysis for in situ Leaching of Ionic Rare Earth Ore Bodies under Similar Simulation Experiments

Open Access
|Nov 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Sketch map of mountain stope surveying layout.
Sketch map of mountain stope surveying layout.

Figure 2:

Flow chart of the ISL process.
Flow chart of the ISL process.

Figure 3:

Comparative analysis of the error between the actual water pressure value and the measured water pressure value.
Comparative analysis of the error between the actual water pressure value and the measured water pressure value.

Figure 4:

Mass of RE precipitated in the leaching solution of the sample at each moment during the leaching process.
Mass of RE precipitated in the leaching solution of the sample at each moment during the leaching process.

Test sample water content test_

Numbering11.393
Aluminum box weight (g)17.05217.56
Box + wet soil mass (g)30.5417.2239.10
Box + drying soil mass (g)30.3430.5438.82
Mass of water (g)0.2030.360.28
Dry soil mass (g)13.290.1821.26
Moisture content (%)1.513.141.32
Average moisture content (%)1.36

Comparison of the error between the actual water pressure value and the measured water pressure value_

Sensor numberMeasured water pressure (kPa)Measured value of pore water pressure (kPa)Measured accuracy (%)
1#1.391.35−0.20
2#1.391.42+0.15
3#1.391.43+0.20
4#2.232.2−0.15
5#2.232.25+0.10
6#2.232.28+0.25
9#1.141.12−0.10
10#1.141.1−0.20
11#1.141.18+0.20

Comparison of several short-range wireless technologies_

Technical standardBluetoothWi-FiMobile communicationsZigBee
Working frequency2.4 GHz2.4 GHz0.8/0.9 GHz 1.8/1.9 GHz868 MHz/915 MHz/2.4 GHz
Coverage10 m100–200 mDepends on network50–300 m
Transmission rate1 M/s11–54 M/s50k–2M10–250k
Power consumptionBigBigSmallMinimum
CostHighLowHighestLow
DelayShortLongShorterShorter
ConfidentialityGoodBetterGoodGood
ScalabilityDifferenceGoodGoodGood
Network capacitySmallBigBigBig
Technical complexityMore complicatedEasyEasyEasy

Content of RE ions in the leaching solution of magnesium sulfate leaching in each time period_

Leaching liquidLeaching time/hRE weight collected in leaching solution (mg)

A1B1C1
Magnesium sulfate1000
21.512.241.15
38.5410.767.56
438.2542.4738.69
510.5812.0115.28
65.473.766.89
70.780.660.45
80.120.10.1

Content of RE ions in the leaching solution of clear water leaching in each time period_

Leaching liquidLeaching time/hRE weight collected in leaching solution (mg)

A2B2C2
Shimizu1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 17, 2023
Published on: Nov 20, 2023
Published by: Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Yun Chuan Deng, ShiJie Kang, Jie Yang, HongDong Yu, YinHua Wan, published by Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.