Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Different patterns of ESG reporting: the sustainability disclosure index of selected European cities Cover

Different patterns of ESG reporting: the sustainability disclosure index of selected European cities

Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

ESG disclosure indices of the analyzed cities.
Source: Own calculations. ESG, Environmental, Social, and Governance.
ESG disclosure indices of the analyzed cities. Source: Own calculations. ESG, Environmental, Social, and Governance.

Additional questions analyzed

Additional questions
  • Do the cities have a stand-alone sustainability report?

  • What other ESG documents do the cities publish, and what do they cover?

  • How often are such reports published?

  • Have these reports been externally audited?

  • Who prepares these reports (which department)?

  • What form do the reports take?

  • Are the indicators in the reports subject to ongoing monitoring, and do they have specific targets/benchmarks?

Recent research on local government sustainability disclosures

ReferenceResearch objectsData collection methodsResults
Marcuccio and Steccolini [2009]12 Italian local authoritiesInterviewsIncreased reporting is “management fashion”; reporting can be a tool to appear innovative and progressive
Bellringer et al. [2011]5 Local government councils in New ZealandSemi-structured exploratory interviewsThe importance of leadership by setting an example for the community; sustainability reporting ensures transparency and accountability to the public; financial incentives can help to encourage commitment to sustainability reporting; using reports to inform and reassure employees and taxpayers about the council’s commitment to sustainability
Williams et al. [2011]Australian local governmentsMail surveyHalf of the respondents report on at least one sustainability area; 40% of non-reporters indicate willingness to report in future
Greco et al. [2012]10 Italian and Australian city councilsInterviewsLarge degree of discretion in sustainability reports of cities; societal norms, values, and culture can influence an organization to take action to reporting; institutional isomorphism has an influential role in the decision to undertake sustainability reporting; the need of developing a sustainability reporting framework to improve; reporting practices and meet the needs of the community and other stakeholders
Navarro-Galera et al. [2014]33 European local governmentsContent analysis of websitesLocal governments are reasonably transparent; no link between disclosure and (financial) development
55 Spanish townsContent analysis of websites; regression analysisThe motivation behind sharing information is often rooted in the personal objectives of leaders and policy creators
Alcaraz-Quiles et al. [2014]Western Australian local government authoritiesContent analysis of websitesModerate engagement in sustainability reporting, with greater emphasis on waste management, biodiversity, energy, and water management, metropolitan councils have better reporting performance than rural councils; local councils are under pressure to meet stakeholder expectations and sustainability reporting would meet these demands
Hossain [2018]Amsterdam, Basel, Dublin, Freiburg, Nuremberg, ZurichMixed methods: document analysis, interviewsSustainability reporting can benefit organizational change, management, and communication, but it can also lead to “fatigue” and abandonment; different practices have emerged based on unique choices about formats, periodicity, authorship, and dissemination efforts
Manes-Rossi et al. [2021]Sample of 18 European SOEs from 8 countriesManual content analysis of integrated reportsGovernment ownership, external audit, investor protection, and adoption of GRI guidelines positively influence IR (integrated reporting) disclosure; SOE size negatively influences IR disclosure; the overall level of IR disclosure among the sampled SOEs increased from an average score of 0.52 in 2013 to 0.68 in 2017

ESG disclosure metrics and number of cities reporting on individual ESG metrics

AreaCategoryScoreNumber of reporting cities
General information10
GIBusiness model (description)115
GIIntegration of sustainability issues (description of the company’s objectives that enable the achievement of SDGs)10
GIManagement of sustainability issues (description of the role of the management and administration regarding sustainability)113
GISignificant impact, risk and opportunities (description)114
GIStakeholder engagement (description)114
GIDescription of the company’s policies concerning SDGs (in the context of value chains)114
GIInformation about incentive systems offered to supervisory bodies and administration for achieving SDGs15
GIDescription of the due diligence process110
GIIdentification of the potential negative impact of the company’s activities on the environment across the entire value chain112
GIDescription of actions taken by the company to prevent or end actual or potential adverse effects113
Environmental indicators climate change4
EManagement of climate change issues (description)115
EGreenhouse gas emissions in tons of CO2 equivalent112
EGreenhouse gas emissions intensity (in Tons of CO2)11
EEnergy consumption and sources (in MWh)113
Other environmental issues5
EEnvironmental policy115
EWater consumption (in m3)13
EWater resource management113
EImpact on biodiversity114
EWaste management112
Social indicators employment7
SDiversity policy115
SEmployment policy115
SWork-life balance policy19
SReintegration policy17
SEqual pay index17
SEmployment turnover (in %)17
SFreedom of association and collective bargaining (in %)11
Occupational health and safety1
SOccupational health and safety13
Human rights2
SHuman rights policy16
SHuman rights due diligence procedures17
Governance indicators corporate governance3
GCompany governing bodies structure11
GIndependent members of governing bodies10
GDiversity in the composition of governing bodies13
Business ethics3
GCode of ethics14
GAnti-corruption policy111
GWhistleblowing mechanism114
Data security and protection1
36Data protection policy115
ESG disclosure index36
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 340 - 353
Submitted on: Sep 26, 2024
Accepted on: Dec 16, 2024
Published on: Dec 30, 2024
Published by: Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Katarzyna Wójtowicz, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.