Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Trends in income taxation: are taxes converging in Central and Eastern European countries? Cover

Trends in income taxation: are taxes converging in Central and Eastern European countries?

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Selected characteristic features of taxation systems and applied tax incentives

Bulgaria
  • Low flat tax rate

  • Tax incentives for regional development, creating jobs, transfer of technologies, or promoting exports

  • Tax preferences in industrial zones

Croatia
  • A hybrid system (components of income and consumption taxation)

  • R&D tax relief

  • Tax preferences for the SME sector

Czechia
  • Lump sum tax-deductible expenses

  • Tax losses can be carried forward

  • R&D tax relief

  • Tax reliefs for investment projects

  • Shortened depreciation period for selected fixed assets

  • Fixed-flat-rate income tax rates

Estonia
  • Profits are not taxed until they are distributed

  • Simple tax system with limited set of tax preferences

  • From 2018, lower tax rate for companies making regular profit distribution

Lithuania
  • Many tax preferences designed to promote entrepreneurship and innovation

  • Some incentives limited in time

  • Tax preferences offered in the SEZs

Latvia
  • Profits are not taxed until they are distributed

  • Favorable tax rates for small businesses

  • Tax preferences in the SEZs and free ports (Ventspils and Riga)

Poland
  • Tax preferences designed to share development risks between entrepreneurs and the state budget (tax losses can be carried forward)

  • R&D tax relief

  • Tax preferences in SEZs

Romania
  • Tax preferences for microbusinesses

  • R&D tax relief

  • Tax preferences in SEZs

Slovakia
  • Tax-deductible expenses – real or lump-sum costs

  • R&D tax relief

  • Tax reliefs for investment projects

Slovenia
  • Special solutions applicable to funds (venture capital, investment, and pension)

  • Tax incentives

Hungary
  • Alternative minimum tax

  • Many tax reliefs and exemptions

1 Source: Based on Felis et al. [2020].

1 R&D, research-and-development; SEZ, special economic zone; SME, small and medium enterprises.

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for the selected indicators of the CEECs and EU-15 countries

StatisticsIND.1IND.2IND.3IND.4
Current income taxes (% of GDP)Corporation income taxes (% of GDP)Corporation income taxes (% of total)Individual income taxes (% of GDP)
EU-15CEEEU-15CEEEU-15CEEEU-15CEE
Min13.66.22.41.86.45.79.94.1
Mean14.27.33.02.27.66.910.34.8
Q113.96.92.62.06.86.210.14.4
Median (Q2)14.27.33.02.27.86.710.34.7
Q314.48.03.22.48.37.510.55.0
Max14.88.63.63.09.19.011.05.7

1 CEEC, Central and Eastern European country; EU, European Union; GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator; max, maximum; min, minimum.

Figure 1.

Indicators showing the characteristic features of the tax systems in the countries covered by the study. IND.1: current taxes on income, wealth, etc., as a percentage of the GDP; IND.2: taxes on the income or profits of corporations, including holding gains, as a percentage of the GDP; IND.3: taxes on the income or profits of corporations, including holding gains, as a percentage of the total; IND.4: taxes on individual or household income, including holding gains, as a percentage of the GDP. GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator.

Figure 2.

Speed of convergence to the reference series in the years 1995-2018. The value “0” indicates perfect similarity between countries, and “1” indicates divergence from the reference country. GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator.

Table 3.

Division into groups of the most similar countries using k-means clustering method

CountryGroup 1Group 2Group 3
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czechia
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Arithmetic mean
   IND.1 – Current income taxes (% of GDP)6.427.507.71
   IND.2 – Corporation income taxes (% of GDP)2.593.351.76
   IND.3 – Corporation income taxes (% of total)8.7610.075.28
   IND.4 – Individual income taxes (% of GDP)3.453.645.71

1 Source: own compilation.

Arithmetic means for each group are given to show the relative position of the groups in relation to each other.

GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator.

Figure 3.

Speed of convergence to reference series in Group 1 (Bulgaria, Croatia, and Romania) in terms of the particular indicators. The value “0” indicates perfect similarity between countries, and “1” indicates divergence from the reference country. GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator.

Figure 4.

Speed of convergence to reference series in Group 2 (Czechia and Slovakia) in terms of the particular indicators. The value “0” indicates perfect similarity between countries, and “1” indicates divergence from the reference country. GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator.

Figure 5.

Speed of convergence to reference series in Group 3 (Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Slovenia) in terms of the particular indicators. The value “0” indicates perfect similarity between countries, and “1” indicates divergence from the reference country. GDP, gross domestic product; IND., indicator.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2023-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 (formerly 2299-9701) | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 349 - 370
Submitted on: May 3, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 5, 2023
Published on: Dec 31, 2023
Published by: SGH Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
JEL:

© 2023 Michał Bernardelli, Paweł Felis, Marcin Jamroży, Jacek Lipiec, Elżbieta Malinowska-Misiąg, Joanna Szlęzak-Matusewicz, Grzegorz Otczyk, published by SGH Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.