Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is the cryptocurrency market efficient? Evidence from an analysis of fundamental factors for Bitcoin and Ethereum Cover

Is the cryptocurrency market efficient? Evidence from an analysis of fundamental factors for Bitcoin and Ethereum

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

NUPL in the period from August 8, 2015 to October 20, 2022.Source: own compilation based on the Glassnode data.Notes: The left panel depicts NUPL for BTC. The right panel depicts NUPL for ETH. BTC, Bitcoin; ETH, Ethereum; NUPL, net unrealized profit/loss.
NUPL in the period from August 8, 2015 to October 20, 2022.Source: own compilation based on the Glassnode data.Notes: The left panel depicts NUPL for BTC. The right panel depicts NUPL for ETH. BTC, Bitcoin; ETH, Ethereum; NUPL, net unrealized profit/loss.

Figure 2

SOPR in the period from August 8, 2015 to October 20, 2022.Source: own compilation based on the Glassnode data.Notes: The left panel depicts SOPR for BTC. The right panel depicts SOPR for ETH. BTC, Bitcoin; ETH, Ethereum; SOPR, spent output profit ratio.
SOPR in the period from August 8, 2015 to October 20, 2022.Source: own compilation based on the Glassnode data.Notes: The left panel depicts SOPR for BTC. The right panel depicts SOPR for ETH. BTC, Bitcoin; ETH, Ethereum; SOPR, spent output profit ratio.

Figure 3

PAP in the period from August 8, 2015 to October 20, 2022.Source: own compilation based on the Glassnode data.Notes: The left panel depicts PAP for BTC. The right panel depicts PAP for ETH. BTC, Bitcoin; ETH, Ethereum; PAP, percent of addresses in profit.
PAP in the period from August 8, 2015 to October 20, 2022.Source: own compilation based on the Glassnode data.Notes: The left panel depicts PAP for BTC. The right panel depicts PAP for ETH. BTC, Bitcoin; ETH, Ethereum; PAP, percent of addresses in profit.

NUPL strategies: performance in the COVID-19 period (2020–2022)

BTCETH


B&HNUPL 1NUPL 2NUPL 3B&HNUPL 1NUPL 2NUPL 3
Min1.241.381.833.90−1.181.491.361.14
Max2.471.592.184.873.113.215.1014.84
Median1.141.502.054.621.922.632.702.77
Mean0.641.502.024.501.182.432.523.00
St. dev.1.010.070.130.321.260.560.672.01
Sharpe ratio0.6320.9115.1813.950.944.343.751.49
N 789 103121158
Success rate 100%100%100% 100%100%98.10%

PAP strategies: performance in the COVID-19 period (2020–2022)

BTCETH


B&HPAP 1PAP 2PAP 3B&HPAP 1PAP 2PAP 3
Min1.241.741.591.44−1.181.621.311.09
Max2.472.272.192.183.112.932.582.43
Median1.142.001.851.691.922.352.021.92
Mean0.642.001.851.771.182.241.931.81
St. dev.1.010.190.210.231.260.350.330.35
Sharpe ratio0.6310.569.017.740.946.425.875.18
N 131722 136151174
Success rate 100%100%100% 100%100%94.83%

NUPL strategies: performance and testing results for the period 2015–2019

BTCETH


B&HNUPL 1NUPL 2NUPL 3B&HNUPL 1NUPL 2NUPL 3
Min−1.791.130.960.91−2.471.771.581.40
Max3.224.024.885.484.9320.7227.4427.44
Median0.852.001.961.851.215.575.275.34
Mean0.842.182.192.181.187.026.656.67
St. dev.1.010.791.041.161.894.544.664.93
Sharpe ratio0.832.762.101.880.621.541.431.35
N 210214217 205213227
Success rate 100%100%100% 100%100%100%
p-value (one-sided test for two means) 0.03**0.06*0.14 0.01**<0.01***<0.01***
p-value (one-sided test for two Sharpe ratios) 0.07*0.150.24 0.07*0.01**0.03**

PAP strategies: performance and testing results for the period 2015–2019

BTCETH


B&HPAP 1PAP 2PAP 3B&HPAP 1PAP 2PAP 3
Min−1.790.521.000.69−2.470.410.400.38
Max3.221.503.693.914.9314.1826.5626.56
Median0.850.812.061.911.213.463.583.45
Mean0.840.992.031.901.183.984.284.41
St. dev.1.010.330.740.801.892.913.373.32
Sharpe ratio0.832.972.742.380.621.371.271.33
N 125150181 326337363
Success rate 38.40%100%97.25% 82.82%84.57%90.64%
p-value (one-sided test for two means) 0.390.120.15 <0.01***<0.01***<0.01***
p-value (one-sided test for two Sharpe ratios) 0.04**0.08*0.14 0.05*0.140.02**

SOPR strategies: performance and testing results for the period 2015–2019

BTCETH


B&HSOPR 1SOPR 2SOPR 3B&HSOPR 1SOPR 2SOPR 3
Min−1.79−22.33−43.39−43.39−2.47−11.18−11.18−33.09
Max3.2255.2055.2055.204.9318.0318.0363.59
Median0.851.130.800.901.212.182.151.29
Mean0.842.962.132.061.181.931.771.55
St. dev.1.017.738.748.511.894.184.367.28
Sharpe ratio0.830.380.240.240.620.460.410.21
N 172207288 233271412
Success rate 54.65%49.28%50.69% 66.67%64.58%51.70%
p-value (one-sided test for two means) 0.03**0.100.06* 0.250.270.39
p-value (one-sided test for two Sharpe ratios) 0.350.140.03** 0.270.280.35

SOPR strategies: performance in the COVID-19 period (2020–2022)

BTCETH


B&HSOPR 1SOPR 2SOPR 3B&HSOPR 1SOPR 2SOPR 3
Min1.24−4.77−6.00−6.00−1.18−4.14−4.14−21.67
Max2.4739.6539.6539.653.1113.0037.2137.21
Median1.144.402.99−0.221.921.952.091.47
Mean0.645.185.252.581.181.762.542.30
St. dev.1.019.179.917.311.264.026.447.58
Sharpe ratio0.630.570.530.350.940.440.390.30
N 2839114 484998
Success rate 57.14%62.16%33.33% 52.08%55.10%50%
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2022-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 351 - 370
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 14, 2022
Published on: Dec 31, 2022
Published by: Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Blanka Łęt, Konrad Sobański, Wojciech Świder, Katarzyna Włosik, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.