Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Who gains more from networking? A comparative study of Polish exporting and non-exporting SMEs Cover

Who gains more from networking? A comparative study of Polish exporting and non-exporting SMEs

Open Access
|Mar 2022

Figures & Tables

Sample characteristics (N=240)

Sample characteristicsExportersNon-exportersTotal



No. of companies% of the sampleNo. of companies% of the sampleNo. of companies% of the sample
No. of employees10–496326%974016067
50–2495724%23108033

Annual sales volume0–2 million Eur5322%883714159
2–10 million Eur4720%23107029
10–50 million Eur208%942912

Type of marketB2B3715%24106125
Both B2B and B2C5021%562310644
B2C3314%40177330

The perceived importance of domestic network partners in achieving market success

Non-exporters (n = 120)Exporters (n = 120)Overall (N =240)



AverageStandard deviationAverageStandard deviationAverageStandard deviation
Direct competitors4.711.6374.861.6674.781.650
Indirect competitors4.241.5014.281.6414.261.569
Customers5.411.3815.361.5385.381.459
Suppliers5.081.5245.331.4905.201.509
Intermediaries4.151.9434.561,8824.351.920
Research institutions3.251.8933.301.9643.281.925
State and local governmental institutions2.951.7723.221,8793.081.828
Trade associations3.061.8123.031,8633.041.834
Family3.791.9953.602.0723.702.032
Friends3.611.9463.502.0213.551.980
Colleagues3.641.9393.521.9963.581.965

Correlations between the importance of domestic and foreign partners and the paired-samples t-test results for non exporters

Type of partner: domestic vs. foreignCorrelations for dependent samplesPaired differencestdfSig. (two-sided)


CorrelationSig.MeanStd. deviationStd. Error Mean95% confidence interval of the difference

LowerUpper
Direct competitors0.3820.00010.6171.9280.1761.2681.9659.1851190.000
Indirect competitors0.5550.0001.2001.5700.1430.9161.4848.3751190.000
Customers0.0750.4182.4172.1440.1962.0292.80412.3461190.000
Suppliers0.3020.0012.0331.9270.1761.6852.38211.5591190.000
Intermediaries0.5060.0001.2081.8100.1650.8811.5357.3141190.000
Research institutions0.4290.0000.4671.8780.1710.1270.8062.7221190.007
State and local0.5040.0000.1171.7060.156−0.1920.4250.7491190.455
governmental
institutions
Trade associations0.4610.0000.1921.8070.165−0.1350.5181.1621190.248
Family0.2610.0040.9332.2520.2060.5261.3404.5401190.000
Friends0.4010.0000.7422.0020.1830.3801.1044.0581190.000
Colleagues0.4030.0000.7671.9950.1820.4061.1274.2101190.000

The perceived significance of the cooperation benefits for the market success

Non-exporters (n = 120)Exporters (n = 120)Overall (N = 240)



AverageStandard deviationAverageStandard deviationAverageStandard deviation
Improving image5.63*1.4096.25*0.9645.941.244
Organizing supplies (parts, raw materials)5.38*1.4215.74*1.3815.561.410
Gathering information on clients’ needs4.99*1.5315.69*1.3335.341.475
Organizing sales and distribution4.83*1.6485.80*1.2345.311.533
Gathering information on potential markets (e.g., market trends, number of clients)4.81*1.5735.63*1.4025.221.543
Organizing promotional activities4.67*1.6625.45*1.6085.061.678
Innovation development4.37*1.8475.47*1.5774.921.800
Acquiring resources (financial and other)4.03*1.8014.74*1.6784.391.773

The perceived importance of foreign network partners in achieving market success

Type of partnerNon-exporters (n = 20)Exporters (n = 120)Overall (N = 240)



AverageStandard deviationAverageStandard deviationAverageStandard deviation
Direct competitors3.09*1,8204.97*1.6854.031.986
Indirect competitors3.04*1.7844.44*1.5603.741.813
Customers2.99*1.7475.38*1.4274.191.992
Suppliers3.04*1.7274.78*1,8853.912.002
Intermediaries2.94*1.6674.21*2.0163.581.952
Research institutions2.781.5892.881.8182.831.704
State and local governmental institutions2.831.6472.781,8262.801.735
Trade associations2.871.6602.771.8232.821.740
Family2.861.6872.921.9732.891.832
Friends2.871.6902.851.9302.861.810
Colleagues2.881.6932.861.9202.871.806

Correlations between the importance of domestic and foreign partners and the paired-samples t-test results for exporters

Type of partner: domestic vs. foreignCorrelations for dependent samplesPaired differencestdfSig. (two-sided)


CorrelationSig.MeanStd. deviationStd. error of the mean95% confidence interval of the difference

LowerUpper
Direct competitors0.3570.000−0.1081.9000.173−0.4520.235−0.6251190.533
Indirect competitors0.4960.000−0.1581.6090.147−0.4490.132−1.0781190.283
Customers0.4770.000−0.0251.5200.139−0.3000.250−0.1801190.857
Suppliers0.4180.0000.5501.8510.1690.2150.8853.2551190.001
Intermediaries0.5820.0000.3501.7850.1630.0270.6732.1481190.034
Research institutions0.5120.0000.4251.8730.1710.0860.7642.4861190.014
State and local governmental institutions0.5600.0000.4421.7380.1590.1270.7562.7831190.006
Trade associations0.6580.0000.2581.5260.139−0.0170.5341.8551190.066
Family0.6290.0000.6831.7440.1590.3680.9994.2921190.000
Friends0.6740.0000.6501.5960.1460.3610.9394.4601190.000
Colleagues0.6620.0000.6581.6110.1470.3670.9504.4751190.000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2022-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 64 - 79
Submitted on: Apr 8, 2021
|
Accepted on: Mar 31, 2022
|
Published on: Mar 31, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Lidia Danik, Dominika Mirońska, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.