Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effect of uncertainty on negative discounting Cover
By: Marcin Palenik  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Ariely, D., Carmon, Z. (2000), Gestalt characteristics of experiences: the defining features of summarized events, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 13, pp. 191–201.
  2. Berns, G.S., Chappelow, J., Cekic, M., Zink, C.F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M.E. (2006), Neurobiological substrates of dread, Science, Vol. 312, pp. 754–758.
  3. Chew, S.H., Ho, J.L. (1994), Hope: An empirical study of attitude toward the timing of uncertainty resolution, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 8, pp. 267–288.
  4. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. (1999), Hedonic adaptation, in: D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz, (Eds), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 302–329.
  5. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. (2008), Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 37, pp. 221–235.
  6. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. (2002), Time discounting and time preference: A critical review, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XL, pp. 351–401.
  7. Green, L., Myerson, J. (1996), Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time, American Zoologist, Vol. 36, pp. 496–505.
  8. Halevy, Y. (2008), Strotz meets Allais: Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect, American Economic Review, Vol. 98, pp. 1145–1162.
  9. Hardisty, D.J., Appelt, K.C., Weber, E.U. (2013), Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 26, pp. 348–361.
  10. Harris, C.R. (2012), Feelings of dread and intertemporal choice, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 25, pp. 13–28.
  11. Johnson, M.W., Bickel, W.K. (2002), Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Vol. 77, pp. 129–146.
  12. Keren, G., Roelofsma, P. (1995), Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, pp. 287–297.
  13. Laibson, D. (1997), Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, pp. 443–477.
  14. Loewenstein, G. (1987), Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption, Economic Journal, Vol. 97, pp. 666–684.
  15. Loewenstein, G., Elster, J. (1992), Choice over time, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  16. Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1991), Negative time preference, The American Economic Review, Vol. 81, pp. 347–352.
  17. Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1993), Preferences for sequences of outcomes, Psychological Review, Vol. 100, pp. 91–108.
  18. Loewenstein, G., Sicherman, N. (1991), Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 67–84.
  19. Lovallo, D., Kahneman, D. (2000), Living with uncertainty: Attractiveness and resolution timing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 13, pp. 179–190.
  20. Madden, G.J., Begotka, A.M., Raiff, B.R., Kastern, L.L. (2003), Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Vol. 11, pp. 139–145.
  21. Mason, W., Suri, S. (2012), Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 44, pp. 1–23.
  22. Mischel, W., Grusec, J., Masters, J.C. (1969), Effects of expected delay time on subjective value of rewards and punishments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 11, pp. 363–373.
  23. Mitchell, S.H., Wilson, V.B. (2010), The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses, Behavioural Processes, Vol. 83, pp. 36–40.
  24. O’Donoghue, T., Rabin, M. (1999), Doing it now or later, American Economic Review, Vol. 89, pp. 103–124.
  25. Ostaszewski, P., Karzel, K. (2007), Discounting of delayed and probabilistic gains and losses by poor and wealthy people, Polish Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 38, pp. 79–87.
  26. Palenik, M. (2014). Atrakcyjność gier losowych a niechęć do ich odroczenia w czasie. Psychologia Ekonomiczna, Vol. 5, pp. 64–79.
  27. Palenik, M. (2017), Zjawisko ujemnej stopy dyskontowej w oparciu o behawioralną hipotezę cyklu życia Shefrina i Thalera, Decyzje, Vol. 28, pp. 59–92.
  28. Sagristano, M.D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N. (2002), Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 131, pp. 364–376.
  29. Samuelson, P. (1937), A note on measurement of utility, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 155–161.
  30. Shefrin, H., Thaler, R. (1988), The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 25, pp. 609–643.
  31. Slovic, P., Flschhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. (1982), Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, Vol. 2, pp. 83–92.
  32. Tokarz, M. (2006), Argumentacja, perswazja, manipulacja, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
  33. Vanderveldt, A., Green, L., Myerson, J. (2015), Discounting of monetary rewards that are both delayed and probabilistic: Delay and probability combine multiplicatively, not additively, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 41, pp. 148–162.
  34. Wang, M., Rieger, M.O., Hens, T. (2016). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 115–135.
  35. Weber, B.J., Chapman, G.B. (2005), The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 96, pp. 104–118.
  36. Wiggins, S., Whyte, P., Huggins, M., Adam, S., Theilmann, J., Bloch, M., Sheps, S.B., Schechter, M.T., Hayden, M.R. (1992), The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntington's disease, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 327, pp. 1401–1405.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2021-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 287 - 298
Submitted on: Feb 14, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 27, 2021
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Marcin Palenik, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.