References
- Avery Jones, J.F., Vann, R., Wheeler, J. (2006), The origins of concepts and expressions used in the OECD model and their adoption by states, Bulletin – Tax Treaty Monitor, IBFD, Vol. 60, No. 6, sec. 2.3.1.
- Barbier, C. (2016), The permanent establishment in a post BEPS world, Tilburg University, Tilburg.
- Boniecka, M., Sołtysiak, P. (2018), Wybrane aspekty prawne i podatkowe dotyczące klauzuli PPT, Przegląd Podatkowy, Vol. 10, pp. 41–51.
- Budesz, K., Komer, W. (2012), Umowy o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania. Opodatkowanie płatności do odbiorców zagranicznych, Difin, Warszawa.
- Dhuldhoya, V. (2018), The future of the permanent establishment concept, Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 72, No. 4a (Special Issue).
- Dos Santos, A., Mota Lopes, C. (2016), Tax sovereignty, tax competition and the base erosion and peofit shifting concept of permanent establishment, EC Tax Review, Vol. 5–6, pp. 296–311.
- Egger, P., Larch, M., Pfaffermayer, M., Winner, H. (2004), The impact of endogenous tax treaties on foreign direct investment: theory and empirical evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 901–931.
- Eisenbeiss, J. (2016), BEPS action 7: evaluation of the agency permanent establishment, Intertax, Vol. 44, No. 6/7, pp. 481–502.
- Elgin, C. (2013), Cyclicality of shadow economy, Economic Papers, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 478–490.
- Engsig, S.K. (2014), Branches of companies in the EU: balancing the eleventh company law directive, national company law and the right of establishment, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1–44.
- Garbarino, C. (2020), Permanent establishments and BEPS action 7: perspectives in evolution, Bocconi Legal Studies, No. 3713098, pp. 1–38.
- Genschel, P., Schwarz, P. (2011), Tax competition: a literature review, Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 9, pp. 339–370.
- Gomułowicz, A. (2007), Wprowadzenie: Unikanie podwójnego opodatkowania, in: M. Jamroży, A. Cloer (Eds), Umowa o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania z Niemcami, C.H. Beck, Warszawa, pp. XXXIII
- Gross, T., Klein, P., Makris, M. (2020), Residence- and source-based capital taxation in open economies with infinitely-lived consumers, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 127, pp. 1–69.
- Hongler, P., Pistone, P. (2015), Blueprints for a new PE Nexus to tax business income in the era of the digital economy, WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, No. 2015–15.
- Jamroży, M. (2014), Planowanie podatkowe działalności prowadzonej poprzez zagraniczny zakład, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Vol. 198, pp. 255–266.
- Jamroży, M. (2016), Zakład zagraniczny w kontekście planu działań BEPS, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Vol. 294, pp. 59–72.
- Jamroży, M. (2018), Ograniczony obowiązek podatkowy osób fizycznych, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Vol. 358, pp. 103–113.
- Jamroży, M., Krysiak, C. (2018), Sztuczne unikanie statusu zakładu poprzez podział umów, in: B. Brzeziński, K. Lasiński-Sulecki, W. Morawski (Eds.), Nowe narzędzia prawne w podatkach dochodowych i majątkowych, Wolter Kluwer, Warszawa, pp. 435–510.
- Janiszewska, M. (2020), Zmiany w procedurach podatkowych i uprawnieniach organów podatkowych – ich znaczenie w kontekście uszczelniania systemu podatkowego w Polsce w latach 2015–2019, Studia BAS, Vol. 4, No. 64, pp. 9–27.
- Janiszewska, M., Węgrzyn, M., Kowalski, P. (2019), Critical assessment of the tie-breaker rule using the example of the DTT Germany-Poland, Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Vol. 63 No. 9, pp. 47–57.
- Jiménez, A.J.M. (2016), The Spanish position on the concept of a permanent establishment: anticipating BEPS, beyond BEPS or simply a wrong interpretation of article 5 of the OECD model? Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 70, No. 8, pp. 458–473.
- Koreń, D. (2013), Charakter Konwencji Modelowej OECD o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania, Monitor Podatkowy, Vol. 8, pp. 20–24.
- Litwińczuk H. (2020), Międzynarodowe prawo podatkowe, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
- NBP (2018), Zagraniczne inwestycje bezpośrednie w Polsce i polskie inwestycje bezpośrednie za granicą w 2017 roku.
- OECD (2015), BEPS Action 7 Final Report, Proposed commentary on article 5(6), para 38.8.
- OECD (2017), Tax Challenges of Digitalisation.
- Oguttu W.A. (2018), Should developing countries sign the OECD multilateral instrument to address treaty-related base erosion and profit shifting measures? Center for Global Development, Washington DC.
- Peretiatkowicz, L. (2016), Wykorzystanie zagranicznego zakładu w międzynarodowym planowaniu podatkowym, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, Vol. 5, No. 83, pp. 119–127.
- Pinto, D. (2006) The Need to Reconceptualize the Permanent Establishment Threshold. Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 266–279.
- Pleijsier, A. (2015), The Agency permanent establishment in BEPS action 7: treaty abuse or business abuse? Intertax, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 147–154.
- PwC (2013), Permanent establishment 2.0. At the heart of the matter, retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/412394251/Pwc-Permanent-Establishments-at-the-Heart-of-the-Matter-Final [access: 20.01.2021].
- Quak, E., Timmis, H. (2018), Double taxation agreements and developing countries. K4D Helpdesk Report, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.
- Reimer, E. (2015), Article 5-permanent establishment, in: B. Johannes, et al. (Eds), Klaus Vogel on double taxation conventions, 4th edn, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp. 293–408.
- Ringe, W.G. (2013), Corporate mobility in the European Union – A flash in the pan? An empirical study of the success of lawmaking and regulatory competition, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 230–267.
- Rixen, T., Schwarz, P. (2009), Bargaining over the avoidance of double taxation: evidence from German tax treaties, FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 442–471.
- Rosenblatt, P. (2015), General anti-avoidance rules for major developing countries, Series on International Taxation, Vol. 49, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.
- Schindel, A., Atchabahian, A. (2005), General Report, in: Source and residence: a new configuration of their principles, IFA Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International, Vol. 90a, pp. 21–31.
- Schmidt, P.K. (2019), Permanent establishment for investors in private equity funds – A legal analysis in light of the changes to the OECD model (2017), Nordic Tax Journal, Vol. 2019, No. 1, pp. 16–40.
- Skaar, A.A. (1991), Permanent establishment: erosion of a tax treaty principle, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Boston.
- Skaar, A.A. (2020), Permanent establishment: erosion of a tax treaty principle, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.
- Uslu, Y. (2018), An analysis of ‘Google Taxes’ in the context of action 7 of the OECD/G20 base erosion and profit shifting initiative, Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 72, No. 4a/Special Issue.
- Vogel, K. (1997), Klaus vogel on double taxation conventions, 3th edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.
- Vogel, K. (1988), Worldwide vs. source taxation of income – A review and re-evaluation of arguments (Part 3), Intertax, Vol. 11, pp. 393–402.
- Warnieło, J. (2016), Międzynarodowe aspekty opodatkowania gospodarki cyfrowej, in: M. Jamroży (Ed.), Opodatkowanie dochodów transgranicznych, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
- Wettersten, M. (2016), How can the proposed changes to the OECD tax model convention in action 1 and action 7 counter the issue of an artificial avoidance of a PE status? Lunds Universitet, Lunds.
- Zimmer, F. (2002), Form and substance in tax law – General report, IFA Cahiers, Vol. 87a, International Fiscal Association.