References
- Achcaoucaou, F., Miravitlles, P., Leon-Darder, F. (2014), Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: a matter of dual embeddedness, International Business Review, Vol. 23, pp. 76–90.
- Ambos, T.C., Andersson, U., Birkinshaw, J.M. (2010), What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 41, pp. 1099–1118.
- Amit, R., Schoemaker, P. (1993), Strategic assets and organizational rents, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 33–46.
- Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. (2000), In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations, Management International Review, Vol. 40, pp. 329–350.
- Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., Holm, U. (2007), Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 802–818.
- Barney, J. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99–120.
- Barney, J.B. (2002), Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Barney, J.B., Clark, D.N. (2009), Resource-based theory. creating and sustaining competitive advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Benito, G.R.G., Grøgaard, B., Narula, R. (2003), Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic countries, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 443–456.
- Benito, G.R.G., Narula, R. (2007), Multinationals on the periphery, Palgrave, London.
- Birkinshaw, J. (1997), Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 207–229.
- Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. (1998), Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 773–795.
- Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., Jonsson, S. (1998), Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 221–241.
- Birkinshaw, J., Toulan, O., Arnold, D. (2001), Global account management in multinational corporations: theory and evidence, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, pp. 231–248.
- Birkinshaw, J.M., Hood, S. (1997), An empirical study of development processes in foreign owned subsidiaries in Canada and Scotland, Management International Review, Vol. 37, pp. 339–364.
- Boehe, D.M. (2008), Product development in emerging market subsidiaries – the influence of autonomy and internal markets on subsidiary roles, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 5, pp. 29–53.
- Burger, A., Jindra, B., Marek, P., Rojec, M. (2018), Functional upgrading and value capture of multinational subsidiaries, Journal of International Management, Vol. 24, pp. 108–122.
- Cantwell, J., Mudambi, R. (2005), MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 1109–1128.
- Crookell, H.H. (1986), Specialization and international competitiveness, in: H. Etemad, L. Seguin-Dulude, (Eds), Managing the multinational subsidiary, Croom Helm, London, pp. 102–111.
- Cyrson, E. (2002), Nowy paradygmat strategii konkurencji, in: E. Skawińska, (Ed), Konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw: nowe podejście, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
- D’Cruz, J.R. (1986), Strategic management of subsidiaries, in: H. Etemad, L. Dulude, (Eds), Managing the multinational subsidiary, St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp. 75–89.
- Delany, E. (1998), Strategic development of multinational subsidiaries in Ireland, in: J. Birkinshaw, N. Hood, (Eds), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development, Macmillan, London, pp. 239–267.
- Delany, E. (2000), Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking, Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, pp. 220–244.
- Dörrenbächer, Ch., Gammelgaard, J. (2006), Subsidiary role development: the effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries, Journal of International Management, Vol. 12, pp. 266–283.
- Drogendijk, R., Andersson, U. (2013), Relationship development in Greenfield expansions, International Business Review, Vol. 22, pp. 381–391.
- Dunning, J.H., Robson, P. (1988), Multinationals and the European community, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
- Dzikowska, M., Gorynia, M., Trapczynski, P. (2017), Towards a strategic shift? On the evolution of Poland’s position in the global economy in 2003–2012, Managing Global Transitions, Vol. 15, pp. 145–168.
- Eckert, S., Rossmeissl, F. (2007), Local heroes, regional champions or global mandates? Empirical evidence on the dynamics of German MNC subsidiary roles in Central Europe, Journal of East-West Business, Vol. 13, pp. 191–218.
- Eisenhardt, K.E., Graebner, M.E. (2007), Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, pp. 25–32.
- Fidrmuc, J., Tichit, A. (2009), Mind the break! Accounting for changing patterns of growth during transition, Economic Systems, Vol. 33, pp. 138–154.
- Filippaios, F., Papanastassiou, M. (2008), US outward foreign direct investment in the European Union and the implementation of the single market: empirical evidence from a cohesive framework, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 969–1000.
- Filippov, S., Duysters, G. (2012), Evolving subsidiary roles and regional economic integration in Europe, Transformations in Business & Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 35–53.
- Ford, S., Strange, R. (1999), Where do Japanese manufacturing firms invest within Europe, and why? Transnational Corporations, Vol. 8, pp. 117–142.
- Gabrisch, H., Hölscher, J. (2006), The successes and failures of economic transition – the European experience, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.
- Ghoshal, S., Nohria, N., (1997), The differentiated network—organizing multinational corporations for value creation, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
- Gorynia, M. (2014), Ewolucja pozycji gospodarki polskiej w gospodarce globalnej i w gospodarce Unii Europejskiej, in: M. Gorynia, S. Rudolf, (Eds), Polska w Unii Europejskiej i globalnej gospodarce, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, Warsaw.
- GUS. (2012, 2015), Rocznik statystyczny, GUS, Warszawa.
- Hedlund, G., Rolander, D. (1990), Action in heterarchies – new approaches to managing the MNC, in: C. Bartlett, Y. Doz, G. Hedlund, (Eds), Managing the global firm, Routledge, London, pp. 15–46.
- Hood, N., Young, S., Lai, D. (1994), Strategic evolution within Japanese manufacturing plants in Europe: UK evidence, International Business Review, Vol. 3, pp. 97–122.
- Jarillo, J.C., Martinez, J.I. (1990), Different roles for subsidiaries: the case of multinational corporations in Spain, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 501–512.
- Jensen, P., Pedersen, T. (2011), The economic geography of offshoring: the fit between activities and local context, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48, pp. 352–372.
- Jindra, B., Giroud, A., Scott-Kennel, J. (2009), Subsidiary roles, vertical linkages and economic development: lessons from transition economies, Journal of World Business, Vol. 44, pp. 167–179.
- Kindleberger, C. (1966), European integration and the international corporation, Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. 1, pp. 65–73.
- Manolopoulos, D., Papanastassiou, M., Pearce, R. (2005), Technology sourcing in multinational enterprises and the roles of subsidiaries: an empirical investigation, International Business Review, Vol. 14, pp. 249–267.
- Mudambi, R., Navarra, P. (2004), Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, pp. 385–406.
- OECD. (2005), Measuring globalisation. OECD economic globalisation indicators 2005, OECD, Paris.
- OECD. (2010), Measuring globalisation. OECD economic globalisation indicators 2010, OECD, Paris.
- PAIiIZ. (2012), Klimat inwestycyjny w Polsce, PAIiIZ, Warszawa.
- Pearce, R. (1999), The evolution of technology in multinational enterprises: the role of creative subsidiaries, International Business Review, Vol. 8, pp. 125–148.
- Penrose, E.T. (1959), The theory of the growth of the firm, Blackwell, Oxford.
- Piekkari, R., Welch, C., Paavilainen, E. (2009), The case study as disciplinary convention: evidence from international business journals, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 12, pp. 567–589.
- Prahalad, C.K., Doz, Y.L. (1981), An approach to strategic control in MNCs’, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 22, pp. 5–13.
- Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G. (1990), The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, pp. 79–91.
- Ragin, Ch.C., Becker, H.S. (Eds) (1992), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Rugman, A., Verbeke, A. (2001), Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 237–250.
- Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., Yuan, W. (2011), Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal’s classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48, pp. 253–277.
- Salgado, O. (2011), Barriers to the accomplishment of a subsidiary’s strategic role: how location and corporate networks influence subsidiary performance, RAC, Vol. 15, pp. 261–282.
- Sass, M., Szalavetz, A., (2013), Crisis and upgrading: the case of the Hungarian automotive and electronics sectors, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 65, pp. 489–507.
- Spanos, Y.E., Lioukas, S. (2001), An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 907–934.
- Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Szalavetz, A. (2018), Impact of greening on the upgrading of manufacturing subsidiaries’ technological capabilities – a Hungarian perspective, Journal for East European Management Studies, Vol. 23, pp. 426–446.
- Taggart, J.H. (1997), Autonomy and procedural justice: a framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy, Journal of International Business Strategies, Vol. 28, pp. 51–76.
- Taggart, J.H. (1999), US MNC subsidiaries in the UK: characteristics and strategic role, in: F. Burton, M. Chapman, A. Cross, (Eds), International Business Organization, MacMillan Press Ltd., Houndmills, pp. 29–46.
- Tippmann, E., Scott, P.S., Reilly, M., O’Brien, D. (2018), Subsidiary coopetition competence: navigating subsidiary evolution in the multinational corporation, Journal of World Business, Vol. 53, pp, 540–554.
- Tsai, M.-T., Yu, M.-Ch., Lee, K.-W. (2006), Relationships between subsidiary strategic roles and organizational configuration: the case of Taiwanese multinational companies, International Journal of Commerce & Management, Vol. 16, pp. 3–14.
- Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannak, E., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011), Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 42, pp. 740–762.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984), A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171–180.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1995), The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 171–174.
- White, R.E., Poynter, T.A. (1984), Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada, Business Quarterly, Vol. 49, 59–69.
- Williams, D. (1998), The development of foreign-owned manufacturing subsidiaries: some empirical evidence, European Business Review, Vol. 98, pp. 282–286.
- Yin, R.K. (2009), Case study research: design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.