Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
A comparison of the computed error norm L2 of the proposed scheme with those given in [11, 15] for M = 10, 20, 40 and k = 1/106 at T = 0.1.
| h | SHCM-L | [15] | [15] | [11] CHCM-L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| θ = 0.1 | θ = 0.2 | |||
| 1/10 | 6.2482 × 10−13 | 1.6534 × 10−4 | 2.4968 × 10−4 | 1.6957 × 10−6 |
| 1/20 | 3.3280 × 10−12 | 4.3906 × 10−7 | 7.8152 × 10−7 | 1.0426 × 10−7 |
| 1/40 | 5.8595 × 10−12 | 8.6154 × 10−10 | 8.0111 × 10−10 | 6.4916 × 10−9 |
| θ = 0.3 | θ = 0.4 | |||
| 1/10 | 6.2482 × 10−13 | 3.2357 × 10−4 | 3.6276 × 10−4 | 1.6957 × 10−6 |
| 1/20 | 3.3280 × 10−12 | 1.0791 × 10−6 | 1.2556 × 10−6 | 1.0426 × 10−7 |
| 1/40 | 5.8595 × 10−12 | 9.2171 × 10−10 | 1.1166 × 10−9 | 6.4916 × 10−9 |
| θ = 0.5 | θ = 0.6 | |||
| 1/10 | 6.2482 × 10−13 | 3.5225 × 10−4 | 2.8316 × 10−4 | 1.6957 × 10−6 |
| 1/20 | 3.3280 × 10−12 | 1.2494 × 10−6 | 1.0109 × 10−6 | 1.0426 × 10−7 |
| 1/40 | 5.8595 × 10−12 | 1.2167 × 10−9 | 1.1107 × 10−9 | 6.4916 × 10−9 |
| θ = 0.7 | θ = 0.8 | |||
| 1/10 | 6.2482 × 10−13 | 1.5954 × 10−4 | 1.9640 × 10−4 | 1.6957 × 10−6 |
| 1/20 | 3.3280 × 10−12 | 5.4419 × 10−7 | 9.1503 × 10−7 | 1.0426 × 10−7 |
| 1/40 | 5.8595 × 10−12 | 7.4804 × 10−10 | 8.6751 × 10−10 | 6.4916 × 10−9 |
| θ = 0.9 | θ = 0.95 | |||
| 1/10 | 6.2482 × 10−13 | 4.5197 × 10−4 | 6.1645 × 10−4 | 1.6957 × 10−6 |
| 1/20 | 3.3280 × 10−12 | 2.0820 × 10−6 | 2.8818 × 10−6 | 1.0426 × 10−7 |
| 1/40 | 5.8595 × 10−12 | 2.4668 × 10−9 | 3.6858 × 10−9 | 6.4916 × 10−9 |
Table 4
A comparison of the computed error norm L∞ of the proposed scheme with those given in [7, 11, 12] for various values of h = k at T = 1.
| h = k | SHCM-L | SHCM-C | [7] | [12] (CN) | [12] (CBVM) | [11] CHCM-L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 5.1578 × 10−5 | 5.1552 × 10−5 | 1.4145 × 10−1 | 1.1 × 10−1 | 2.8 × 10−2 | 5.8498 × 10−5 |
| 0.1 | 3.1586 × 10−5 | 3.1587 × 10−5 | 3.7195 × 10−2 | 3.0 × 10−2 | 3.8 × 10−3 | 3.1584 × 10−5 |
| 0.05 | 9.7106 × 10−6 | 9.7107 × 10−6 | 8.4588 × 10−3 | 6.9 × 10−3 | 2.7 × 10−4 | 9.7065 × 10−6 |
| 0.025 | 2.5489 × 10−6 | 2.5489 × 10−6 | 2.0698 × 10−3 | 1.7 × 10−3 | 1.3 × 10−5 | 2.5485 × 10−6 |
| 0.0125 | 6.4490 × 10−7 | 6.4490 × 10−7 | 5.1473 × 10−4 | 4.2 × 10−4 | 5.1 × 10−7 | 6.4488 × 10−7 |
| 0.00625 | 1.6171 × 10−7 | 1.6171 × 10−7 | 1.1 × 10−4 | 3.6 × 10−8 | 1.6171 × 10−7 | |
| 0.01 | 4.1333 × 10−7 | 4.1333 × 10−7 | 4.1332 × 10−7 | |||
| 0.005 | 1.0353 × 10−7 | 1.0353 × 10−7 | 1.0353 × 10−7 | |||
| 0.0025 | 2.5895 × 10−8 | 2.5895 × 10−8 | 2.5895 × 10−8 | |||
| 0.002 | 1.6574 × 10−8 | 1.6574 × 10−8 | 1.6574 × 10−8 | |||
| 0.001 | 4.1437 × 10−9 | 4.1437 × 10−9 | 4.1437 × 10−9 |
Table 5
A comparison of the computed error norms L2 and L∞ of the proposed scheme with those given in [9, 11] for h = 1/16, k = 0.01 at various T.
| tfinal | L2 | L∞ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHCM-L | [11] CHCM-L | [9] | SHCM-L | [11] CHCM-L | [9] | |
| 0.1 | 5.1774 × 10−4 | 2.9917 × 10−4 | 4.86 × 10−3 | 2.9891 × 10−4 | 2.9891 × 10−4 | 6.79 × 10−3 |
| 0.3 | 2.1558 × 10−4 | 1.2457 × 10−4 | 8.87 × 10−5 | 1.2447 × 10−4 | 1.2447 × 10−4 | 3.76 × 10−4 |
| 0.5 | 4.9872 × 10−5 | 2.8818 × 10−5 | 1.73 × 10−3 | 2.8793 × 10−5 | 2.8793 × 10−5 | 2.44 × 10−4 |
| 0.7 | 9.6911 × 10−6 | 5.5999 × 10−6 | 2.04 × 10−4 | 5.5950 × 10−6 | 5.5953 × 10−6 | 3.17 × 10−4 |
| 0.9 | 1.7294 × 10−6 | 9.9934 × 10−7 | 2.14 × 10−3 | 9.9847 × 10−7 | 9.9856 × 10−7 | 3.14 × 10−3 |
| 1.0 | 7.1591 × 10−7 | 4.1368 × 10−7 | 2.15 × 10−3 | 4.1332 × 10−7 | 4.1338 × 10−7 | 3.32 × 10−3 |