Life After COVID-19: What if We Never go Back to the Office?
By: Kevin R. Murphy
References
- Abrams, Z. (2019). The future of remote work. Monitor on Psychology, 50 (9), 54.
- Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance Management (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
- Anderson, A.J., Kaplan, S.A. & Vega, R.P. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 882–897.
- Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., & Bendoly, E. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 193–201.
- Bernstein, E. & Waber, B. (2019, November-December). The truth about open offices. Harvard Business Review,
https://hbr.org/2019/11/the-truth-about-open-offices . - Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt N. and Borman W.C. (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Byrne, S., Coates, D., Keenan, E. & McIndoe-Calder, T. (2020). The initial labour market impact of COVID-19. Economic Letters, Central Bank of Ireland, No. 4
- Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Campbell, J.P., & Wiernik, B. (2015). The modeling and assessment of performance at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74.
- Charalampous, M., Grant, C.A., Tramontano, C. & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 51–73.
- Courtright, S.H., Thurgood, G.R., Stewart, G.L. & Pierotti, A.J. (2015). Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1825–1846
- Crosbie, T. & Moore, J. (2004). Work-life balance and working from home, Social Policy and Society, 3, 223–233.
- Bailey, D.E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 283–400.
- Chong, S., Huang, Y, & Chang, C. (2020). Supporting interdependent telework employees: A Moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. Journal of Applied Psychology,
https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ul.ie/10.1037/apl0000843.supp - Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9, 309–331.
- Felstead, A. & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 195–212.
- Gajendran, R.S., & Harrision, D.A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.
- Gera, S. (2013). Virtual teams versus face to face teams: A review of literature. IOSR Journal if Business and Management, 1(2), 1–4.
- Golden, T.D. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60, 1641–1667.
- Golden, T.D., & Veiga, J.F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301–318.
- Golden, T.D., Veiga, J.F. & Dino, R.N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421.
- Ibarra, H., Gillard, J. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2020, July 16). Why WFH is not necessarily good for women. Harvard Business Review,
https://hbr.org/2020/07/why-wfh-isnt-necessarily-good-for-women . - Kramer, A. & Kramer, K.Z. (2020). The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119.
https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ul.ie/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442 - Landivar, L.C. (2015). The gender gap in employment hours: Do work-hour regulations atter? Work, Employment and Society, 20, 550–570
- Marsh, K, & Musson, G. (2008). Men at work and at home: Managing emotion in telework. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 31–48.
- Morganson, V.J., Major, D.A., Oborn, K.L., Verive, J.M., & Heelan, M.P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 578–595.
- Murphy, K.R., Cleveland, J.N., & Hanscom, M. (2018). Performance Appraisal and Management: Why does it Fail and how can it be Fixed? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Organ D.W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington, Books.
- Purvanova, R.K. (2014). Face-to-face versus virtual teams: What have we really learned? The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17, 2–29
- Pulakos, E. D. (2009). Performance management: A new approach for driving business results. Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Salas, E., Goodwin, G.F. & Burke, S. (2009). Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches. New York: Routledge.
- Smith C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.
- Sumita, R., Hill, S.N., Gibbs, J.L. & Likoebe, M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. The Academy of Management Annals, 13, 308–341
- Waber, B., Magnolfi, J. & Lindsay, G. (2014, October). Workplaces that move people. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 68–77.
- Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98–107.
- Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 125–139.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijm-2021-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2451-2834 (formerly 1649-248X) | Journal ISSN: 1649-248X
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 85
Published on: Oct 13, 2021
Published by: Irish Academy of Management
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Kevin R. Murphy, published by Irish Academy of Management
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.