Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Screening by Social Workers in Medical Patients with Risk of Post-Acute Care Needs: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial / Evaluation eines Screenings durch Sozialarbeiter bei medizinischen Patienten mit einem Risiko für post-akuten Nachsorgebedarf: eine stepped wedge clusterrandomisierte Studie Cover

Screening by Social Workers in Medical Patients with Risk of Post-Acute Care Needs: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial / Evaluation eines Screenings durch Sozialarbeiter bei medizinischen Patienten mit einem Risiko für post-akuten Nachsorgebedarf: eine stepped wedge clusterrandomisierte Studie

Open Access
|Apr 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Ward-level randomization in stepped wedge clusters in weeks
Ward-level randomization in stepped wedge clusters in weeks

Figure 2

Flow diagram of the study
Flow diagram of the study

Figure 3

Average duration from admission to SW notification
Average duration from admission to SW notification

Affected organ system (main diagnosis) of the patients with SW notification

Intervention period (n = 62)Control period (n = 58)
Infections26%17%
Respiratory system19%17%
Cardiovascular system14%19%
Digestive system10%7%
Neoplasms8%9%
Nervous system8%5%
Genitourinary system2%7%
Others13%19%

ADL, IADL and unavailability of help at home

Intervention period (n = 62)Control period (n = 58)p-Value
PACD total score (M, SD)13 (± 4.7)13 (± 4.4).91
Needs help in general77.4%74.1%.68
Help with personal hygiene46.8%44.8%.83
Help with dressing/undressing37.1%31.0%.48
Help with toileting (urine/defecation)19.4%20.7%.86
Help with bathing / showering53.2%41.4%.19
Help with mobility37.1%24.1%.13
Help with eating / drinking14.5%15.5%.88
Help with transfer (bed / chair)24.2%20.7%.65
Help with transportation (car / public)66.1%46.6%.03

p <.05

Help with shopping71.0%50.0%.02

p <.05

Help with cooking59.7%50.0%.29
Help with house keeping69.4%63.8%.52
Help with medication management45.2%44.8%.97
Unavailability of help at home45.9%54.1%.20
Help with transfer on day 356.1%34.0%.02

p <.05

Help with bathing / showering on day 384.2%71.7%.11

Unadjusted time to SW notification, hospital length of stay and delayed discharge time in nights

Intervention period (n = 62)Control period (n = 58)p-Value
MedianIQRMedianIQR
Time to SW notification1.21.91.72.4.42
Hospital length of stay10.08.99.16.4.41
Delayed discharge time0.02.50.01.4.39

GEE Results for the dependent variable: length of stay

Model adjusted for calendar days, help with transportation, help with shopping (day 1), and help with transfer (day 3)
day 1 adjusted (n=120)day 1 & 3 adjusted (n=110)
ßCI (95%)p-ValueßCI (95%)p-Value
Intervention.001-.358 to .360.995-.119-.460 to .221.492
Control--Referent--Referent
Calendar days.004-.003 to .010.298.004-.022 to .011.180
No help with transportation-.140-.377 to .096.246-.088-.296 to .120.408
Help with transportation--Referent--Referent
No help with shopping.239-.028 to .506.079.159-.055 to .373.145
Help with shopping--Referent--Referent
No help with transfer day 3---.009-.211 to .228.939
Help with transfer day 3-----Referent

GEE Results for the dependent variable: discharge delay

Model adjusted for calendar days, help with transportation, help with shopping (day 1), and help with transfer (day 3)
day 1 adjusted (n=120)day 1 & 3 adjusted (n=110)
ßCI (95%)p-ValueßCI (95%)p-Value
Intervention.090-.560 to .740.786.110-.637 to .857.773
Control--Referent-Referent
Calendar days.005-.009 to .019.498.003-.013 to .019.713
No help with transportation-.722-1.231 to -.214.005-.764-1.312 to -.217.006
Help with transportation--Referent--Referent
No help with shopping.798.295 to 1.300.002.689.122 to 1.256.017
Help with shopping--Referent--Referent
No help with transfer day 3---.084-.314 to .482.680
Help with transfer day 3-----Referent

Admission from and discharge to places for patients notified to SW services

(n=120)Admitted from

Chi2, p = 0.57 exact test

Discharged to

Chi2, p = 0.97 exact test

InterventionControlInterventionControl
Home82.3%70.7%17.8%15.5%
Home with home care service11.3%20.7%24.2%24.1%
Geriatric home, other social medical institutions0%1.7%6.5%8.6%
Nursing home1.6%1.7%20.9%22.5%
RehabilitationNA25.8%22.4%
Psychiatric clinic0%1.7%NA
Acute hospitalNA1.6%1.7%
Others4.8%3.5%3.2%5.2%

GEE Results for the dependent variable: SW notification

Model adjusted for calendar days, help with transportation, help with shopping (day 1), and help with transfer (day 3)
day 1 adjusted (n = 120)day 1 & 3 adjusted (n = 110)
ßCI (95%)p-ValueßCI (95%)p-Value
Intervention-.548-1.155 to .060.077-.736-1.387 to -.085.027
Control--Referent--Referent
Calendar days.010-.003 to .022.142.009-.005 to 0.22.212
No help with transportation.127-.418 to .671.648.052-.475 to .580.846
Help with transportation-Referent--Referent
No help with shopping.003-.586 to .591.993-.148-.656 to .361.570
Help with shopping--Referent--Referent
No help with transfer day 3---.165-.281 to .611.469
Help with transfer day 3-----Referent
Language: English, German
Page range: 25 - 34
Submitted on: Jan 5, 2017
Accepted on: Dec 22, 2017
Published on: Apr 25, 2018
Published by: ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Antoinette Conca, Doaa Ebrahim, Sandra Noack, Angela Gabele, Helen Weber, Mehrnaz Prins, Anja Keller, Mariann Hari, Angela Engel, Katharina Regez, Ursula Schild, Philipp Schuetz, Beat Müller, Sebastian Haubitz, Alexander Kutz, Andreas Huber, Lukas Faessler, Petra Schäfer-Keller, published by ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.