Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An optimization model for the fair distribution of prize money in ATP tournaments Cover

An optimization model for the fair distribution of prize money in ATP tournaments

Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. Arlegi, R., & Dimitrov, D. (2020). Fair elimination-type competitions. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 528-535.10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.025
  2. ATP (2021). https://www.atptour.com/.
  3. Balliauw, M., Verlinden, T., van Den Spiegel, T., & van Hecke, J. (2017). Towards a sustainable financial model for professional tennis players (No. 2017006).
  4. Bane, M. & Gescheit, D. (2015). Rich rewards for those at the top in tennis, but what of the rest. The Conversation.
  5. Beaton, A., Thompson, N., and S, K. (2015). No 1 vs no 32: how much does the 32nd player make in tennis and other sports. Retrieved from http://graphics.wsj.com/usopen32 on 10 October 2015.
  6. Byl, J. (2013). Organizing Successful Tournaments, 4E. Human Kinetics.
  7. Dagaev, D. & Suzdaltsev, A. (2018). Competitive intensity and quality maximizing seedings in knock-out tournaments. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 35(1),170–188.10.1007/s10878-017-0164-7
  8. Dantzig, G. B., & Thapa, M. N. (2006). Linear programming 1: introduction. Springer Science & Business Media.
  9. Della Croce, F., Dragotto, G., & Scatamacchia, R. (2020). On fairness and diversification in WTA and ATP tennis tournaments generation. Annals of Operations Research, 1–13.
  10. Gilsdorf, K. F. & Sukhatme, V. A. (2008). Testing Rosen’s sequential elimination tournament model: Incentives and player performance in professional tennis. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(3), 287–303.10.1177/1527002507306790
  11. Huang, L. (2016). Prize and incentives in double-elimination tournaments. Economics Letters, 147,116–120.10.1016/j.econlet.2016.08.035
  12. Karpov, A. (2018). Generalized knockout tournament seedings. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 17(2), 113–127.10.2478/ijcss-2018-0006
  13. Kendall, G., Knust, S., Ribeiro, C. C., & Urrutia, S. (2010). Scheduling in sports: An annotated bibliography. Computers & Operations Research, 37(1),1–19.10.1016/j.cor.2009.05.013
  14. Knyazev, D. (2017). Optimal prize structures in elimination contests. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 139, 32–48.10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.017
  15. Kutz, S. (2014). How tennis’s pay gap compares to other sports. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-tenniss-pay-gap-compares-to-other-sports-1408997701 on 22 July 2014.
  16. Press, S. (2018). Decision-making under pressure: a study of tennis professionals (Doctoral dissertation).
  17. Quinlan, G. (2012). The lay of the land: Prizemoney in professional tennis.
  18. Rabadi, G., Khallouli, W., Al-Salem, M., and Ghoniem, A. (2015). Planning and management of major sporting events: a survey. International Journal of Planning and Scheduling, 2(2),154–178.10.1504/IJPS.2015.072122
  19. Reid, M., Morgan, S., Churchill, T., & Bane, M. K. (2014). Rankings in professional men’s tennis: a rich but underutilized source of information. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(10), 986-992.10.1080/02640414.2013.87608624506799
  20. Rosen, S. et al. (1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. American Economic Review, 76(4), 701–715.
  21. Sandy, R. (2017). The economics of sport: An international perspective. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  22. Sunde, U. (2003). Potential, prizes and performance: Testing tournament theory with professional tennis data. Available at SSRN 477442.10.2139/ssrn.477442
  23. Taha, H. A. (2017). Operations Research An Introduction.© Pearson Education Limited 2017. Vu, T. D. (2010). Knockout tournament design: a computational approach. Stanford University.
  24. Westmattelmann, D., Sprenger, M., Hokamp, S., & Schewe, G. (2020). Money matters: The impact of prize money on doping behaviour. Sport Management Review, 23(4), 688-703.10.1016/j.smr.2019.09.005
  25. Wright, M. (2014). OR analysis of sporting rules–a survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(1), 1–8.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.043
  26. Zandonai, T., & Holgado, D. (2020). Doping in tennis, where we are and where we should be going?. Performance Enhanceme310.1016/j.peh.2020.100157
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 29
Published on: Mar 24, 2022
Published by: International Association of Computer Science in Sport
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Zureneth Govea, Francisco Pérez-Galarce, Alfredo Candia-Véjar, published by International Association of Computer Science in Sport
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.