Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Analysis in Polish Enterprises - The Use of Data Analysis in Making Strategic Decisions Cover

Data Analysis in Polish Enterprises - The Use of Data Analysis in Making Strategic Decisions

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Own research questionnaire

Question numberQuestionAnswer variants
1How many people does your company currently employ?Number of employees
• Agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing
• Industry, mining and energy
• Construction
• Wholesale and retail trade; vehicle repair
• Transport and warehousing
• Accommodation and catering
2Branch• Information and communication (IT, media, telecommunications)
• Financial and insurance activities
• Activities related to real estate market services
• Professional, scientific and technical activities (law, consulting, engineering)
• Administrative and support services activities (HR, leasing, service)
• Public Administration and Education
• Healthcare and social assistance
Culture, entertainment, recreation and other services
3How long has the company been operating on the market?In years
4How often is business decision-making based on dataScale 1–5 (1 – never, 5 – regularly)
5What areas of the company's operations are analyzed based on measurable data?
5.1HR
5.2Pricing
5.3Financial and sales forecastsLikert scale 1–5 (1 – never, 5 – regularly)
5.4Cost analysis
5.5Staff efficiency
5.6Investment profitability analysis
6What areas of your business do you plan to analyze based on measurable data over the next 12 months?
6.1HR
6.2Pricing
6.3Financial and sales forecastsLikert scale 1–5 (1 – never, 5 – regularly)
6.4Cost analysis
6.5Staff efficiency
6.6Investment profitability analysis
7What data sources are used in your enterprise?
7.1Data from accounting systems
7.2Data from CRM/ERP systemsLikert scale 1–5 (1 – never, 5 – regularly)
7.3Social media
7.4Internal research
7.5External market data
8What do you think are the barriers to data analysis in the enterprise:
8.1Lack of analytical skills among employees
8.2Lack of time
8.3Low level of digitization within the companyLikert scale 1–5 (1 – very strong barrier, 5 – very weak barrier)
8.4Employee resistance
8.5Lack of appropriate IT tools and systems
8.6Difficulty integrating data from various sources
8.7Concerns about data security and confidentiality
9How do you assess data quality in your organization?Scale 1–5 (1 – very low quality, 5 – very good quality)
10Does the company use artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) algorithms?Scale 1–5 (1 – never, 5 – regularly)
11Does management have the skills to independently interpret advanced reports?Yes/No
12Does the company have a dedicated department for data collection/processing?Yes/No
13Does the company plan to increase time investment in data analytics over the next year?Scale 1–5 (1 – definitely no, 5 – definitely yes)
14Does the company plan to increase engagement in data analytics over the next year?Scale 1–5 (1 – definitely no, 5 – definitely yes)

[i] Source: Author's own study.

Table 2.

Tau-Kendall coefficients – company size/time on the market and frequency of using data in making managerial decisions

FactorTau-Kendall coefficient
Company size0.529
Time on the market0.365

[i] Source: Author's own study.

Table 3.

Tau-Kendall coefficients – company size/time on the market and using various data sources

FactorData from accounting systemsData from CRM/ERP systemsSocial mediaOwn researchExternal market data
Company size0.4100.6550.2610.7140.672
Time on the market0.4040.5230.2320.5700.515

[i] Source: Author's own study.

Table 4.

Model parameters

Regression Statistics
Multiple R0.59
R Square0.35
Fitted R Square0.32
Standard Error0.46
Observations99
Variance AnalysisdfSSMSFF significance
Regression510.52.110.10.00000010
Residual9319.340.21
Total9829.84
CoefficientsStandard errort Statp-valueLower 95%Upper 95%
Intersection2.940.2114.2-2.533.36
X10.0010.00061.680.09−0.00010.002
X20.020.012.570.010.010.04
X3−0.040.05−0.740.46−0.140.06
X40.030.070.490.63−0.10.17
X50.430.152.890.0040.140.73

[i] Source: Author's own study.

Table 5.

Model parameters

Regression Statistics
Multiple R0.36
R Square0.13
Fitted R Square0.05
Standard Error0.54
Observations99
Variance AnalysisdfSSMSFF significance
Regression80.481.670.120.12
Residual900.29
Total98
CoefficientsStandard errort Statp-valueLower 95%Upper 95%
Intersection3.670.884.160.000071.925.43
X10.00020.060.0041−0.120.12
X2−0.070.06−1.30.2−0.180.04
X3−0.10.12−0.890.38−0.330.13
X4−0.10.14−0.710.48−0.380.18
X50.120.130.970.34−0.130.38
X60.020.120.130.9−0.230.26
X7−0.10.32−0.330.74−0.740.53
X80.1460.053.180.002−0.060.24

[i] Source: Author's own study.

Chart 1.

Distribution of answers to questions no. 4 and no. 14

Source: Author's own study.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2026-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2449-8939 | Journal ISSN: 2449-8920
Language: English
Page range: 185 - 196
Published on: Sep 15, 2026
Published by: Jagiellonian University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Emil Zelma, published by Jagiellonian University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.