When Confidence Meets Control: How CEO Overconfidence Orchestrates Strategic Exploration And Breakthrough Innovation

Nagwan AlQershi; Ramayah Thurasamy

doi:10.2478/ijcm-2026-0012

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

When Confidence Meets Control: How CEO Overconfidence Orchestrates Strategic Exploration And Breakthrough Innovation

International Journal of Contemporary Management

Volume 62 (2026): Issue 1 (March 2026)

By: Nagwan AlQershi and Ramayah Thurasamy

Open Access

|Aug 2026

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines how CEO overconfidence influences business model innovation (BMI) through organizational exploration and investigates the governance and managerial conditions under which exploratory initiatives generate sustained innovation outcomes. Specifically, it explores the complementary roles of board expertise, board power, managerial advice-seeking capabilities, and coordination flexibility in transforming strategic risk-taking into adaptive innovation.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on upper echelons theory, corporate governance research, organizational exploration, and the dynamic managerial capabilities perspective, this study develops and tests a multi-level conceptual framework. Multi-source survey and archival data were collected from 319 publicly listed and large private firms operating in Malaysia. The proposed relationships were analysed using structural equation modelling.

Findings

The findings indicate that CEO overconfidence positively influences organizational exploration, but its impact on BMI depends on effective governance and managerial capabilities. Board expertise and board power strengthen the positive effects of exploratory initiatives by directing executive risk-taking towards productive opportunities. Furthermore, managerial advice-seeking capabilities enhance exploration breadth, while coordination flexibility facilitates the conversion of exploratory activities into business model innovation. The results demonstrate that alignment among executive cognition, governance structures, and managerial capabilities is essential for sustaining innovation in technologically dynamic environments.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature by conceptualizing organizational exploration as a coordinated multilevel governance process linking executive cognition, board oversight, and managerial capabilities. It extends understanding of how governance mechanisms and dynamic managerial capabilities jointly transform strategic exploration into business model innovation, offering a more integrated explanation of adaptive innovation under conditions of environmental uncertainty and technological disruption.

References

Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, G., Crossland, C., & Luo, S. (2015). Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1513–1535. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2291
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12186
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C1105::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162073.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469–1484. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1374
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gratton, L., & Scott, A. J. (2021). The 100-year life: Living and working in an age of longevity. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01753.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069433
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC). (2022). Malaysia digital economy blueprint (MyDIGITAL). Government of Malaysia.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2003). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556617
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. (2023). Main science and technology indicators, Volume 2022 Issue 2. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1cdcb031-en
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Posen, H. E., & Levinthal, D. A. (2012). Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Science, 58(3), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1420
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2099
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WIPO. (2023). World intellectual property indicators 2023. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.48541
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
World Bank. (2023). Malaysia economic monitor. World Bank.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
World Bank. (2023). Malaysia economic monitor: Expanding Malaysia's digital frontier. World Bank.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2026-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2449-8939 | Journal ISSN: 2449-8920

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 140 - 159

Published on: Aug 19, 2026

Published by: Jagiellonian University

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

CEO overconfidence,

board expertise,

managerial advice-seeking,

coordination flexibility capability,

breakthrough innovation,

business model innovation,

environmental dynamism,

dynamic managerial capabilities,

strategic leadership

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Business management,

Management, organization, corporate governance,

Business management, other,

Industries,

Non profit organizations (NPO), foundations, charities, associations,

Public sector, public private partnerships, public administration

© 2026 Nagwan AlQershi, Ramayah Thurasamy, published by Jagiellonian University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 62 (2026): Issue 1 (March 2026)