Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Theory of Entrepreneurship Becoming as an Analytical Framework: Towards an Integrative Conceptual Model Cover

The Theory of Entrepreneurship Becoming as an Analytical Framework: Towards an Integrative Conceptual Model

By: Grzegorz Baran and  Bąk Janusz  
Open Access
|Sep 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

A meta-theoretical model of entrepreneurship as a process of becomingSource: Own elaboration.
A meta-theoretical model of entrepreneurship as a process of becomingSource: Own elaboration.

Key dimensions of entrepreneurial endorsement: mechanisms of legitimacy, risk mitigation, and entrepreneurial action field constitution in the entrepreneurial ecosystem

Dimension of EndorsementFocusStructural ComponentMechanism of Field Constitution
Social EndorsementSupport and recognition for entrepreneurial activities by influential and credible individuals, organizations, or institutions, which builds trust and social legitimacy within the ecosystem. It helps mitigate social risk associated with societal reactions, acceptance, norms, and user behaviors through community engagement, user experience research, and effective communication.Social relations, authorities, reputation, and influence networks.Public recommendations, support, and positive evaluations that reinforce social acceptance and visibility of the entrepreneur and their activities.
Feasibility EndorsementSupport and recognition of the technical and operational feasibility of entrepreneurial endeavors, based on assessments of competencies, resources, and capacity to execute the venture. It addresses feasibility risk, including potential technical or operational challenges (e.g., technological gaps, resource shortages, budget overruns).Competencies, resources, infrastructure, and institutional support.Verification and confirmation of project feasibility by experts and institutions, reducing uncertainty and enhancing confidence in the capability to deliver.
Value EndorsementThe expression of approval and recognition of the value offered by a product, service, or initiative, emphasizing its uniqueness and significance for stakeholders. It reduces value risk: that the product or service will not meet user expectations.Market values, customer needs, and unique value proposition.Public validation of the value and attractiveness of the offering, influencing perceptions among customers and business partners.
Viability EndorsementSupport signaling the sustainability, stability, and long-term prospects of an endeavor. It addresses viability risk, which concerns the profitability and enduring success of the business model.Business model, profitability, financial, and institutional support.Recognition of the capacity to generate profits and sustain operations in the market, thereby enhancing credibility with investors and stakeholders.

Key dimensions of entrepreneurial–structural integration as processes of entrepreneurial action field constitution

Dimension of IntegrationFocusStructural ComponentMechanism of Field Constitution
Normative IntegrationAdaptation and synchronization of entrepreneurial action with the normative social structure, enabling both the actor’s embedding in and co-creation of social order through reflexive alignment with social norms and valuesNorms, cultural codes, moral expectationsInternalization and reproduction of shared norms through action; legitimizing entrepreneurial activity within the social environment
Cognitive IntegrationAdoption and co-creation of belief systems and interpretive frameworks that guide entrepreneurial perception and action, enabling alignment with shared meanings (ideal structure) and reproduction or transformation of interpretative rulesKnowledge structures, schemas, language, and sense-making patternsReflexive alignment with local meaning systems, contributing to how entrepreneurship is understood and framed in a specific context
Interactional IntegrationEmbedding within social networks and patterns of interactionSocial relations, communication routines, roles, and social capitalEngaging in repeated social exchanges, building trust and mutual recognition, and establishing intersubjective presence within a community or field.
Embedding within social networks and patterns of interaction that structure access to influence, legitimacy, and coordination, shaped by interactive routines and authority resources
Opportunity IntegrationAccessing and activating context-specific possibilities and material resources embedded in the opportunity structure and mobilized through allocative resourcesMaterial and institutional resources, infrastructures, and accessMobilizing enabling conditions such as funding, technologies, institutions, and shaping trajectories of action by navigating opportunity structures.

Integration and endorsement in action: A Case Study of Spotify

DIMENSIONSUBDIMENSIONACTIONS & TOOLSEXPLANATION
Normative IntegrationRegulatory complianceLobbying and influencing legislation, such as involvement in the Music Modernization Act (MMA) in the United StatesObtaining formal approval from regulatory institutions and the music industry for the operation and development of a new music streaming modelAdapting to local regulations, especially in terms of copyright and privacy protectionFacilitating licensing and development of the streaming market
Standard co-creationEnsuring that copyrights are respected by taking over the Loudr platform for music licensing – simplifying licensingEngagement in developing new legal and market standards for streaming servicesReducing legal risk and simplifying payments for artists
TransparencyPromoting a more transparent and creator-friendly compensation model Negotiating licensing agreements with music labels for the legal and compensated distribution of digital musicEnhancing financial transparency and negotiation position
Cognitive IntegrationAlignment with values and visionSubscription-based streaming as an ethical and legal alternative to music piracyIncreasing the legitimization of streaming as a legal form of music consumption
Market educationPromoting the value of fair compensation for artists (e.g., Spotify publicly sharing data on artist payouts)Raising awareness of convenient and legal music use while supporting creatorsIncreasing trust of artists and users in the payment model
Interactional IntegrationCollaborationEngagement in designing and promoting initiatives supporting artists (e.g., Spotify for Artists, programs for independent creators that enabled them to reach a wider audience)Increasing artist engagement and loyalty
Technological partnershipsSeeking technological partnerships (e.g., Google, Apple, Amazon) and integration with smartphones and audio devices like Sonos, Google HomeStrengthening presence in the technological ecosystem
Opportunity IntegrationMarket creationFreemium/Premium model offering users free access to music with ads (freemium version) and the option to upgrade to a paid premium subscription, free of ads but with better sound quality, as a market structure redefinitionIdentifying and leveraging opportunities in the streaming market (technological convergence: streaming, Internet, mobile devices)Establishing a new standard in the digital music market
New channels creationCollaboration with advertisers and creating new opportunities for brands (e.g., new advertising options in Spotify Ads Studio, which allowed smaller businesses to create and broadcast ads on the platform).Identifying opportunities in the music market due to the lack of a legal, convenient, and universally accessible platform to play music at reasonable pricesGaining new revenue streams and advertising partners
Technological innovationUtilizing technology to create new opportunities (e.g., using artificial intelligence in recommendation mechanisms, which enhanced user experience, increased time spent on the platform, and attracted new subscribers)Increasing personalization and time spent on the platform
Social EndorsementBrand imageBuilding the image of a company with a „friendly culture” and innovative approach (e.g., organizing events, collaborating with artists, creating podcasts, and engaging in local music-related initiatives)Alignment with the vision and values by a broad group of stakeholders – users, artists, the music industry, and the publicIncreasing social acceptance and positive brand image
LoyaltyTransparency and openness in communication, such as operational guidelines, privacy policy, and the impact of platform usage on artist compensationEngaging subscribers through community values (e.g., Spotify Wrapped – an annual summary of listened tracks, account sharing) – personalizing relationshipsBuilding a loyal community and culture around the brand
Feasibility EndorsementProfitabilityProving the profitability of the streaming model for artists and record labels, which led to a shift in attitudes and formal acceptanceGaining music industry acceptance of the model
ExpansionRapidly achieving a massive user base, giving the company an edge over competitors, while educating the market about the value of paid musicStrengthening market position and scalability of the model
Value EndorsementValue co-creationProving that the business model is fair and not aimed at monopolizing the market, transparency and adherence to fair play principlesConvincing various stakeholder groups of the value of cooperation and that the company operates in their best interests, creating value for both itself and those it collaborates withIncreasing stakeholder engagement in platform development
EthicsImplementing fair compensation for creators for the use of their work.Enhancing reputation as an ethical music platform
Viability EndorsementScalabilityPioneering in the streaming segment and convincing stakeholders of an innovative business model that offers not only convenient access to music but also fair compensation for artistsStrengthening leadership position in the digital music market
AdaptabilitySatisfying investor interests and company growth through global market expansion and adaptation to local needs (e.g., offering diverse payment options, supporting local artists, integrating with local partners)Increasing adaptability to local needs

Structural Dimensions in Sztompka’s Theory of Social Becoming and Giddens’s Structuration Theory

Theory of becoming - dimensions of structureStructuration Theory - rules and resourcesDescriptionEntrepreneurship perspective
Normative structureNormative rulesConfiguration of rules for different people in different positions - limits or discourages certain actions, and at the same time prescribes certain actions and encourages them.Rules and regulations
Ideal structureInterpretive rulesThe configuration of beliefs and views held by people in different positions within the organization suggests rejection of some beliefs but requires recognition of others.Preferences and expectations of customers and stakeholders
Interactional structureAuthority resourcesTypical forms of communication between people in different positions - typical interaction paths that close one and open other communication channels.Network of contacts, channels and patterns of interaction
Opportunity structureAllocative resourcesTypical distribution of opportunities to access socially valued goods - limits the resources necessary for certain activities, but also favors certain activities by providing the necessary resources.Access to customers. resources, institutional support and monetizable business models
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2025-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2449-8939 | Journal ISSN: 2449-8920
Language: English
Page range: 136 - 152
Published on: Sep 30, 2025
Published by: Jagiellonian University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Grzegorz Baran, Bąk Janusz, published by Jagiellonian University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.