Negative and positive effects of the influx of tourists in the opinion of residents of large cities (Krakow and Tricity) and smaller towns and villages
| Negative effects of the influx of tourists | Location | Positive effects of the influx of tourists | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drunk and aggressive tourists | Large/small | Better living conditions | Small |
| Insecurity | Large | Increased opportunities in the labor market | Large/small |
| Traffic jams and disruptions | Large/small | Higher earnings | Large/small |
| Difficulty finding parking spaces | Large | Better cultural offers in the town, organizing more events | Large/small |
| Congestion on public transport | Large | Learning about cultures through contact with people from other countries and regions | Large/small |
| General crowding in the city making everyday life and recreation difficult | Large | Better communication in the city (which develops due to the need to meet increased transport needs) | Large |
| Environmental pollution, e.g., littering the beach, lack of waste segregation by tourists | Large/small | Improvement in infrastructure and the gastronomic offer | Large/small |
| Increase in product prices | Large/small | ||
| A tiring frequent question for directions | Large |
The appropriateness of the deconcentration strategy in the opinion of residents_
| Size of town | Most common answers | Sample reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Large cities |
| “I would prefer tourists to stay concentrated where they are because I will have peace in places known only to me”. |
| Small towns | Deconcentration is unimportant; what matters is the promotion of existing tourist attractions to attract visitors to small towns. | “It would be good if tourists also came to us, it would provide our town with new jobs”. |