Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Aggregated attribute no_ 13: VG project limits
| Aggregated attribute no 13 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The individualism of public and private actors instead of collective orientation | ||||||||
| The number of administrative structures can limit the effectiveness of collaboration | ||||||||
| Difficulty in making new destination from existing destinations (e.g., the Rhone Valley, Burgundy & Provence) | ||||||||
| It can be only a marketing product-label which will be not commercialized | ||||||||
| The lack of responsiveness of public structures in relation to private actors |
Aggregated attribute no_ 1: Dominant participants
| Aggregated attribute no 1 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wine & gastronomy activities | ||||||||
| Wineries and wine cellars | ||||||||
| Places to visit | ||||||||
| Restaurants and inns | ||||||||
| Outstanding experiences |
Aggregated attribute no_ 8: VG perception
| Aggregated attribute no 8 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| It has rigorous selection of the offers | ||||||||
| It was created to promote local experiences & products | ||||||||
| It is a brand specific to a territory and not a national label | ||||||||
| It has new categories of classification (outstanding experiences & gourmet offers) | ||||||||
| It does not take into account the administrative borders of the administrative territories | ||||||||
| It is based on gastronomy excellence | ||||||||
| It is based on geographical logic | ||||||||
| It is based on regional collaboration | ||||||||
| It is based on know-how | ||||||||
| It is a label that has a potential | ||||||||
| It is a destination that makes sense | ||||||||
| It is a collective project |
Aggregated attribute no_ 4: Regular collaboration
| Aggregated attribute no 4 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion: social media, welcoming journalists | ||||||||
| Workshops and study tours (Educ-tours) | ||||||||
| Promotion & development of labels | ||||||||
| Participation in tourism fair trades |
Aggregated attribute no_ 9: VG’s future perception
| Aggregated attribute no 9 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This label will participate in the promotion of our business | ||||||||
| This label will increase collaboration between tourism destinations | ||||||||
| This label will become the major destination for tourists | ||||||||
| Generally, we believe it will become the new destination |
Aggregated attribute no_ 2: Previous dominant labels
| Aggregated attribute no 2 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin | ||||||||
| Vignobles et Découvertes | ||||||||
| Vignerons Indépendants | ||||||||
| Maître restaurateur |
Aggregated attribute no_ 3: Dominant partner of collaboration
| Aggregated attribute no 3 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tourism Offices | ||||||||
| Department | ||||||||
| Region | ||||||||
| Other |
Aggregated attribute no_ 5: VG collaboration
| Aggregated attribute no 5 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application for the label | ||||||||
| Promotion & Marketing | ||||||||
| Information meetings organized by the public structures | ||||||||
| No links yet | ||||||||
| No new dynamic at the moment | ||||||||
| New dynamic in general collaboration | ||||||||
| New dynamic depends on the label success | ||||||||
| Uprising dynamic due to the VG |
Aggregated attribute no_ 11: Profits of VG participation
| Aggregated attribute no 11 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional source of our structure’s visibility | ||||||||
| Increasing our business profits | ||||||||
| Offering packaged products to regional, national and international customers | ||||||||
| Participation in a collective project | ||||||||
| It will strengthen the collaboration between the territorial destinations |
Aggregated attribute no_ 12: VG development
| Aggregated attribute no 12 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A great marketing tool but a difficult product to commercialize | ||||||||
| The label will be used mainly by tour operators | ||||||||
| This will increase interest of international and national tourists | ||||||||
| This is an opportunity to create a globally recognized destination |
Aggregated attribute no_ 10: VG beneficial actors
| Aggregated attribute no 10 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public structures | ||||||||
| Tour operators & Incoming agencies | ||||||||
| Labelled actors | ||||||||
| Customers (tourists) |
Aggregated attribute no_ 7: General perception of the labels in France
| Aggregated attribute no 7 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| They reflect the quality of products & services | ||||||||
| They are a source of information for visitors | ||||||||
| They are the marketing tools | ||||||||
| They do not reflect the promised quality |
The number of objects in particular clusters related to values of particular aggregated attributes
| Cluster | Number of objects in cluster | Dominant participants | Dominant previous labels | Dominant partner of collaboration | Regular collaboration | VG collaboration | VG application process | General perception of labels | VG perception | VG future perception | VG beneficial actor | Profits of VG participation | VG development | VG project limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 12 | 12 | 29 | 55 | 14 | 19 | 30 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 21 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 27 | 0 | 7 | 16 |
| 2 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 31 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 22 | 16 | 32 | 37 | 12 | 31 | 35 | 15 | 19 | 16 | 11 | 16 | 8 | 15 |
| 5 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 53 | 28 | 12 | 43 | 52 | 53 | 53 | 37 | 33 | 28 | 20 |
| 6 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 50 | 67 | 9 | 39 | 37 | 51 | 78 | 44 | 92 | 26 | 15 |
| 7 | 27 | 17 | 24 | 49 | 23 | 26 | 44 | 44 | 33 | 42 | 28 | 28 | 37 | 23 |
Aggregated attribute no_ 6: VG application process
| Aggregated Attribute no 6 | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | Cluster 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| It was easy to apply | ||||||||
| It was fair because rewards having other labels | ||||||||
| It was fair because it selects the best offers | ||||||||
| Participation in the information meetings |