Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Innovative work-life balance after COVID-19 Cover

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Framework for the WLB survey of working parentsSource: own study.
Framework for the WLB survey of working parentsSource: own study.

Figure 2

Work involvement during the pandemic as assessed by working parents during the pandemic (data in %)Source: own study based on research results.
Work involvement during the pandemic as assessed by working parents during the pandemic (data in %)Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 3

Satisfaction with working life (by gender)Note: Satisfaction with working life scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.Source: own study based on research results.
Satisfaction with working life (by gender)Note: Satisfaction with working life scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 4

Work satisfaction according to form of employment (average grade on the scale)Note: Work life satisfaction scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.Source: own study based on research results.
Work satisfaction according to form of employment (average grade on the scale)Note: Work life satisfaction scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 5

Work satisfaction according to employment sector (average score on the scale)Note: Work life satisfaction scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.Source: own study based on research results.
Work satisfaction according to employment sector (average score on the scale)Note: Work life satisfaction scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 6

Comparing the time spent working with job satisfactionNote: Work life satisfaction scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.The scale of time spent on work is from 1 to 5, where “1” means that the time spent on work is much shorter, and “5” means that the time spent on work is much longer compared to the time before the pandemic.Source: own study based on research results.
Comparing the time spent working with job satisfactionNote: Work life satisfaction scale from 1 to 5, where “1” means that you are very dissatisfied, and “5” means that you are very pleased.The scale of time spent on work is from 1 to 5, where “1” means that the time spent on work is much shorter, and “5” means that the time spent on work is much longer compared to the time before the pandemic.Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 7

Assessment of changes in work involvement in comparison with the system of performed workSource: own study based on research results.
Assessment of changes in work involvement in comparison with the system of performed workSource: own study based on research results.

Figure 8

Change in childcare involvement during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (average score).Note: on the scale from 1 to 5, “1” means that the time spent on work is much shorter, and “5” means that the time spent on work is much longer compared to the time before the pandemic.Source: own study based on research results.
Change in childcare involvement during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (average score).Note: on the scale from 1 to 5, “1” means that the time spent on work is much shorter, and “5” means that the time spent on work is much longer compared to the time before the pandemic.Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 9

Commitment to household chores before and since the onset of the pandemic (by gender)Note: 3 levels of commitment level, i.e., smaller (I dealt with a smaller part of these duties), medium (I dealt with the greater part of these duties), high (only I performed these duties); comparison of pre-pandemic time to pandemic time.Source: own study based on research results.
Commitment to household chores before and since the onset of the pandemic (by gender)Note: 3 levels of commitment level, i.e., smaller (I dealt with a smaller part of these duties), medium (I dealt with the greater part of these duties), high (only I performed these duties); comparison of pre-pandemic time to pandemic time.Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 10

Assessment of family time spent on caring for children (by gender; cumulative values; N=6688)Source: own study based on research results.
Assessment of family time spent on caring for children (by gender; cumulative values; N=6688)Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 11

Assessment of the contribution of time devoted to caring for children in the family in the opinion of women (by gender; cumulative values; N=6045)Source: own study based on research results.
Assessment of the contribution of time devoted to caring for children in the family in the opinion of women (by gender; cumulative values; N=6045)Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 12

Assessment of the contribution of time devoted to caring for children in the family in the opinion of men (by gender; cumulative values; N=643)Source: own study based on research results.
Assessment of the contribution of time devoted to caring for children in the family in the opinion of men (by gender; cumulative values; N=643)Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 13

Assessment of the possibility of separating work and private time (by gender)Source: own study based on research results.
Assessment of the possibility of separating work and private time (by gender)Source: own study based on research results.

Figure 14

Those reporting “very satisfied” with professional life's level of need to adapt their work to taking care of childrenSource: own study based on research results.
Those reporting “very satisfied” with professional life's level of need to adapt their work to taking care of childrenSource: own study based on research results.

Figure 15

Assessment of the degree of satisfaction with professional life in relation to responses to the need to adapt work to childcare (average on the scale)Note: the scale of satisfaction with professional life goes from 1 to 5, where 1 means very dissatisfied and 5 very satisfied.Source: own study based on research results.
Assessment of the degree of satisfaction with professional life in relation to responses to the need to adapt work to childcare (average on the scale)Note: the scale of satisfaction with professional life goes from 1 to 5, where 1 means very dissatisfied and 5 very satisfied.Source: own study based on research results.

Assessment of the importance of the possibility of reconciling work and private life when choosing a workplace (gender and age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
Decisive or very important65.6%66.6%55.4%64.2%69.0%63.1%52.0%
Important25.6%25.2%30.1%15.3%23.9%27.4%31.3%
Insignificant / hard to judge8.8%8.2%14.5%20.5%7.1%9.5%16.7%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square49.26794.798
df (degrees of freedom)26
Relevance.000*.000*

Advantages and disadvantages of work-life balance in corner planes

Disadvantages of out of balanceThe benefits of a balanced approach
OrganizationAbsence from workIncrease in the productivity and competitiveness of entities
Increase in fluctuation in employmentIncrease in employee motivation
Less commitment to workIncrease in employee loyalty and their identification with the workplace
Increased stress among employeesAcquiring and retaining better qualified employees
Less concentration and productivity of employeesReducing stress among employees
Worse relationships at work and with clientsReduction of costs resulting from employee rotation
Less creativity and innovation of employeesBuilding a positive image of the entity: socially responsible and family-friendly
Loss of investment in human capitalIncrease in the quality of work Increase in the value of the entity over the long term
Employee (his family)Stress for employees and their familiesIncreased self-esteem of employees and motivation to work
Deterioration of health, including mental healthReduced stress and disease
Conflicts in the familyReducing the feeling of guilt due to the lack of time to be with children (family) and/ or to perform professional duties
Worse childcare
Divorces/one-parent familiesGreater satisfaction with the ability to reconcile various components of life (work, family, personal life) Increasing job satisfaction Identification of employees with the workplace
Alcoholism and the increase of addiction
Increase in civilization diseases
Lack of sense of security in family and professional life

Assessment of combining work with parental obligations (according to education and place of residence)

EducationPlace of living
Less than secondarySecondaryHigher vocational educationHigher educationVillageCity up to 50.000City 50.000-500.000City over 500.000
19.7%4.2%3.1%3.0%3.4%3.5%4.0%3.1%
28.3%4.7%6.1%5.8%5.4%5.9%5.7%5.9%
320.5%20.2%19.7%17.6%19.4%21.4%18.7%15.7%
424.1%26.4%27.7%33.1%29.8%28.2%32.1%33.3%
537.4%44.5%43.4%40.5%42.0%41.0%39.5%42.1%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676
Pearson’s chi-square tests
EducationPlace of living
Chi-square75.60333.205
df (degrees of freedom)1212
Relevance.000*.001*

Comparison of the degree of satisfaction with working life versus commitment to household chores before the pandemic (assessment of job life satisfaction on a scale*, commitment score on a scale**)

Satisfaction with working lifeCommitment to household chores before the pandemic
TotalSmallerMediumBig
110.2%9.3%9.1%12.3%
219.2%17.9%19.2%20.5%
333.6%31.7%35.3%33.4%
426.0%27.6%26.1%24.2%
511.1%13.5%10.3%9.5%
Overall7800238829872425
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Commitment to household chores before the pandemic
Chi-square49.610
df (degrees of freedom)8
Relevance.000*

Assessment of the adaptation of work to childcare in relation to commitment to work

Commitment to work:Adapting work to childcare
OverallDefinitely yesProbably yesProbably notDefinitely notHard to say
It has definitely increased12.1%12.0%12.2%11.0%15.4%11.5%
It has increased13.4%11.7%15.3%14.0%10.8%10.9%
It is the same42.4%33.7%43.5%52.3%50.4%42.1%
It has decreased15.3%17.9%16.5%11.6%8.0%12.0%
It has definitely decreased11.0%19.2%7.3%5.2%9.6%10.4%
Hard to say5.8%5.5%5.2%5.9%5.9%13.1%
Total7800244730701353564366
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Adapting work to childcare
Chi-square424.569
df (degrees of freedom)20
Relevance.000*

Assessment of combining work with parental responsibilities (according to the number of children in upbringing)

Children upbringing
OverallOneTwoThreeFour or more
13.4%4.5%3.0%2.2%6.8%
25.7%6.5%5.3%5.7%5.9%
318.3%19.3%18.0%18.1%14.8%
431.2%30.7%32.3%28.6%27.8%
541.3%38.9%41.4%45.5%44.7%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square43.704
df (degrees of freedom)12
Relevance.000*

Comparison of the degree of satisfaction with work life versus commitment to household chores since the beginning of the pandemic (work life satisfaction rating on a scale*, commitment rating on a scale**)

Satisfaction with working lifeCommitment to household chores since the start of the pandemic
TotalSmallerMediumBig
110.2%8.2%8.4%13.5%
219.2%16.6%18.7%21.8%
333.6%31.4%35.3%33.5%
426.0%29.7%26.5%22.5%
511.1%14.1%11.1%8.6%
Overall7800219828512751
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Commitment to household chores since the start of the pandemic
Chi-square127.932
df (degrees of freedom)8
Relevance.000*

Assessment of combining work with childcare (age, gender)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
Yes, ALL the time I work while caring for a child / children24.1%24.8%17.4%18.8%25.8%22.7%24.8%
Yes, I combine MOST of my working time with childcare28.3%28.3%28.1%21.6%29.0%28.3%21.5%
Yes, but I combine a SMALL amount of working time with childcare22.4%21.9%27.8%22.7%21.1%23.8%21.1%
I DO NOT COMBINE working with looking after a child / children21.4%21.1%23.7%30.7%19.7%21.9%30.5%
Hard to say3.8%3.9%3.0%6.2%4.4%3.2%2.0%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square29.36956.297
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.000*.000*

Assessment of combining work with parental responsibilities (by gender and age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
13.4%3.1%6.8%9.1%2.0%4.4%6.9%
25.7%5.2%10.4%5.7%4.5%6.8%8.5%
318.3%17.8%23.2%16.5%16.2%20.2%22.4%
431.2%31.4%29.3%19.9%31.4%31.8%28.0%
541.3%42.5%30.3%48.9%45.9%36.9%34.1%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square93.684144.594
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.000*.000*

Assessment of the change in work involvement in the work system statement

Commitment assessmentWork system
TotalOnly in the remote work systemRemote work dominatesRemote work and stationary work at the company’s premisesStationary work at the company’s headquarters is dominantOnly stationary work at the company’s premisesAnother form
It has definitely increased12.1%16.3%16.6%11.3%10.8%9.2%11.0%
It has increased13.4%19.4%18.2%15.4%14.6%8.2%10.5%
It is the same42.4%33.9%37.1%43.9%39.3%49.6%29.5%
Rather, it has decreased15.3%16.0%15.3%17.4%20.0%13.3%12.0%
It has definitely decreased11.0%11.0%9.5%8.4%9.6%11.6%25.0%
Hard to say5.8%3.4%3.3%3.5%5.6%8.1%12.0%
Overall7800155111687359153231200
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Work system
Chi-square433.546
df (degrees of freedom)25
Relevance.000*

Assessment of the importance of the possibility of reconciling work and private life when choosing a workplace (number of children during upbringing)

Children upbringing
OverallOneTwoThreeFour or more
Decisive or very important65.6%64.0%65.8%70.1%56.5%
Important25.6%26.5%25.9%23.3%22.4%
Insignificant / hard to judge8.8%9.5%8.3%6.6%21.1%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square59967
df (degrees of freedom)6
Relevance.000*

Time spent at work during the pandemic compared to the time before the pandemic (number of children upbringing)

Children upbringing
OverallOneTwoThreeFour or more
14.8%4.3%4.7%5.6%8.0%
29.0%8.6%8.8%10.7%10.5%
338.8%38.6%39.0%39.1%35.4%
421.3%20.8%21.4%22.5%18.1%
526.2%27.8%26.1%22.2%27.8%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square23.983
df (degrees of freedom)12
Relevance.020*

Satisfaction with working life (gender, age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
110.2%10.1%10.3%16.5%11.0%9.2%8.5%
219.2%19.1%19.9%21.0%19.0%19.1%22.4%
333.6%34.3%26.9%21.0%33.6%34.3%31.3%
426.0%25.8%27.7%19.3%26.0%26.4%23.6%
511.1%10.6%15.2%22.2%10.4%10.9%14.2%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square24.75351.639
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.000*.000*

Assessment of work adaptation to childcare (education and place of living)

EducationPlace of living
Less than secondarySecondaryHigher vocational educationHigher educationVillageCity up to 50.000City 50.000-500.000City over 500.000
Definitely yes27.3%32.2%31.9%31.3%30.3%28.1%29.1%35.4%
Rather yes33.5%31.7%38.5%41.4%37.3%38.2%37.5%42.7%
Rather no17.6%18.0%17.6%17.2%19.2%21.0%19.0%13.0%
Definitely not11.2%10.8%9.3%6.0%7.9%7.8%9.1%5.3%
Hard to say10.4%7.3%2.7%4.1%5.4%4.9%5.3%3.7%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676
Pearson’s chi-square tests
EducationPlace of living
Chi-square119.250113.991
df (degrees of freedom)1212
Relevance.000*.000*

Assessment of childcare conditions in relation to the work performed (assessment according to indications on the list of prepared sentences; education and place of residence)

EducationPlace of living
Less than secondarySecondaryHigher vocational educationHigher educationVillageCity up to 50.000City 50.000-500.000City over 500.000
I adapt childcare to working conditions20.9%22.1%27.0%28.4%26.5%26.8%26.5%27.8%
I adapt my work to taking care of children33.1%34.4%36.2%38.2%34.3%32.8%34.0%43.9%
Working time - adjusting to the current conditions of functioning of schools and other care and educational institutions28.8%31.7%39.6%43.0%36.5%37.3%37.5%46.9%
I adjust the working time to the working time of other people who look after children21.2%18.8%17.6%16.5%18.4%18.7%15.9%16.2%
Neither sentence fits my situation34.2%30.2%22.4%19.0%24.4%23.4%24.3%16.9%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676

Assessment of the degree of satisfaction with professional life in relation to the need to adapt work to childcare

Satisfaction with working lifeThe need to adapt work to childcare
TotalDefinitely yesRather yesRather noDefinitely notHard to say
110.2%15.5%5.9%6.2%15.2%16.7%
219.2%21.9%19.5%17.4%14.0%13.7%
333.6%30.1%35.5%35.2%32.4%36.3%
426.0%21.0%29.0%29.3%24.6%24.3%
511.1%11.5%10.0%12.0%13.7%9.0%
Overall7800244730701353564366
Pearson’s chi-square tests
The need to adapt work to childcare
Chi-square262.083
df (degrees of freedom)16
Relevance.000*

Assessment of the adaptation of work to childcare (number of children in upbringing)

Children upbringing
OverallOneTwoThreeFour or more
Definitely yes31.4%30.3%30.8%36.3%30.4%
Rather yes39.4%39.0%40.2%38.5%31.6%
Rather no17.3%17.0%18.3%14.2%16.9%
Definitely not7.2%8.2%6.7%6.1%12.2%
Hard to say4.7%5.5%4.0%5.0%8.9%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square54.019
df (degrees of freedom)12
Relevance.000*

Assessment of combining work with childcare (education, place of living)

EducationPlace of living
Less than secondarySecondaryHigher vocational educationHigher educationVillageCity up to 50.000City 50.000-500.000City over 500.000
Yes, ALL the time I work with caring for a child / children21.9%22.7%22.7%24.7%22.4%21.5%23.6%27.1%
Yes, I combine MOST of my working time with childcare18.0%17.4%26.2%31.4%25.5%24.5%25.9%34.0%
Yes, but I combine a SMALL amount of working time with childcare14.0%19.8%22.6%23.4%22.3%22.5%22.5%22.5%
I DO NOT COMBINE working with looking after a child / children33.5%33.0%26.2%17.6%25.3%26.7%23.8%14.1%
Hard to say12.6%7.2%2.3%2.8%4.6%4.8%4.3%2.4%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676
Pearson’s chi-square tests
EducationPlace of living
Chi-square348.449188.593
df (degrees of freedom)1212
Relevance.000*.000*

Change in childcare involvement during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (gender and age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
13.4%3.4%3.4%8.0%3.7%2.9%3.3%
28.0%8.0%7.9%9.1%8.4%7.6%6.9%
326.7%26.4%30.3%30.1%26.4%26.7%29.3%
429.5%29.1%33.9%22.7%29.0%30.2%31.7%
532.4%33.2%24.6%30.1%32.6%32.6%28.9%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square24.52623.808
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.000*.022*

Assessment of the possibility of separating work and private time (according to the number of children in upbringing)

Children upbringing
OverallOneTwoThreeFour or more
Definitely yes16.5%18.6%15.8%15.0%16.9%
Rather yes38.2%37.7%38.8%38.2%32.5%
Rather no24.4%22.9%25.1%24.7%24.5%
Definitely not16.4%16.2%16.2%17.0%21.1%
Hard to say4.4%4.7%4.1%5.1%5.1%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square20.700
df (degrees of freedom)12
Relevance.055

Assessment of the importance of the possibility of reconciling work and private life when choosing a place of work (education and place of living)

EducationPlace of living
Less than secondarySecondaryHigher vocational educationHigher educationVillageCity up to 50.000City 50.000-500.000City over 500.000
Decisive or very important38.1%55.9%63.4%69.3%63.6%64.1%59.7%71.5%
Important36.7%31.1%26.2%23.8%26.5%26.0%30.1%21.9%
Insignificant / hard to judge25.2%13.0%10.4%6.9%9.9%9.8%10.2%6.6%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676
Pearson’s chi-square tests
EducationPlace of living
Chi-square229.24276.138
df (degrees of freedom)66
Relevance.000*.000*

Assessment of the importance in choosing a workplace, the possibility of reconciling work and private life in comparison with adapting work to childcare

Possibility to combine work with childcareAdapting work to childcare
TotalDefinitely yesRather yesRather noDefinitely notHard to say
The decider / dominant32.9%49.3%28.2%20.2%22.2%26.0%
Very important, but not conclusive32.7%27.6%37.3%34.7%27.3%28.4%
Important25.6%18.3%27.5%32.2%29.3%29.2%
Not so important2.1%1.5%1.7%3.4%5.0%1.4%
Irrelevant1.0%0.4%0.7%1.5%3.7%0.8%
It’s hard to judge4.1%2.2%3.7%5.5%6.9%10.7%
I do not care about this1.6%0.8%0.8%2.5%5.7%3.6%
Overall7800244730701353564366
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Adapting work to child-care
Chi-square717.559
df (degrees of freedom)24
Relevance.000*

Time spent in work during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic time (age of children - non-cumulative categories)

Children’s age
Overall0-3 years4-5 years6-8 years9-14 years15-18 yearsOver 18 yearsNo data
14.8%4.9%6.3%5.6%4.6%5.5%4.5%10.0%
29.0%10.8%11.2%10.7%8.6%7.1%7.4%0.0%
338.8%38.7%35.4%36.8%39.6%41.4%39.2%50.0%
421.3%21.9%20.7%21.2%21.8%20.7%19.1%20.0%
526.2%23.6%26.4%25.8%25.4%25.3%29.8%20.0%
Overall7800775116733565644137865010

Change in childcare involvement during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic (number of children upbringing)

Children upbringing
TotalOneTwoThreeFour or more
13.4%3.3%3.4%2.4%8.4%
28.0%7.4%8.2%7.9%9.7%
326.7%28.1%26.5%24.1%27.8%
429.5%28.6%29.7%32.4%24.1%
532.4%32.7%32.2%33.1%30.0%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square34.074
df (degrees of freedom)12
Relevance.001*

Assessment of combining work with childcare (number of children in upbringing)

Children upbringing
OverallOneTwoThreeFour or more
Yes, ALL the time I work with caring for a child / children24.1%24.5%23.4%25.6%27.0%
Yes, I combine MOST of my working time with childcare28.3%26.9%29.5%27.5%24.1%
Yes, but I combine a SMALL amount of working time with childcare22.4%21.3%23.4%22.7%15.6%
I DO NOT COMBINE working with looking after a child / children21.4%23.9%20.0%20.3%24.9%
Hard to say3.8%3.4%3.7%3.9%8.4%
Overall7800233942011023237
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Children upbringing
Chi-square43.749
df (degrees of freedom)12
Relevance.000*

Assessment of the possibility of separating work and private time (by gender and age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
Definitely yes16.5%15.9%22.1%19.9%16.1%16.5%19.9%
Rather yes38.2%38.4%37.0%33.0%38.6%38.4%34.6%
Rather no24.4%24.5%22.9%21.6%23.9%24.9%24.4%
Definitely not16.4%16.7%13.7%15.9%16.7%16.3%15.9%
Hard to say4.4%4.5%4.2%9.7%4.7%3.9%5.3%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square20.18121.619
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.000*.042*

_Time spent at work during a pandemic compared to pre-pandemic time (age, gender)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
14.8%4.7%5.6%8.5%5.3%4.2%3.3%
29.0%8.6%12.5%11.4%9.5%8.6%6.1%
338.8%38.4%42.3%36.9%39.9%38.1%33.7%
421.3%21.4%20.1%21.0%20.7%21.8%22.0%
526.2%26.8%19.5%22.2%24.6%27.3%35.0%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square28.77833.403
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.000*.001*

Assessment of the adaptation of work to childcare (gender and age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 30 years31-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
Definitely yes31.4%31.5%30.3%30.7%35.3%28.0%25.6%
Rather yes39.4%39.4%38.9%34.7%39.3%39.6%39.0%
Rather no17.3%17.2%19.1%13.6%14.7%19.9%20.7%
Definitely not7.2%7.2%7.6%10.8%6.1%8.0%11.0%
Hard to say4.7%4.8%4.1%10.2%4.7%4.5%3.7%
Overall7800706373717636453733246
Pearson’s chi-square tests
GenderAge
Chi-square2.67697.722
df (degrees of freedom)412
Relevance.613.000*

Assessment of the adaptation of work to childcare in comparison with the simultaneous performance of caring and professional duties

Adaptation of work to careCombining work with simultaneous (at the same time) performance of duties related to caring for the child / children
OverallYes, ALL the time I work with caring for a child / childrenYes, I combine MOST of my working time with child / child careYes, but I combine SMALL working time with child / child careI DO NOT COMBINE working with looking after a child / childrenHard to say
Definitely yes31.4%53.4%33.8%18.4%18.4%23.2%
Rather yes39.4%31.7%50.3%48.4%25.2%33.0%
Rather no17.3%7.8%10.7%24.3%29.8%16.2%
Definitely not7.2%4.0%1.8%4.5%21.2%5.4%
Hard to say4.7%3.1%3.3%4.4%5.5%22.2%
Total78001879220717501667297
Pearson’s chi-square tests
Combining work with simultaneous (at the same time) performance of duties related to caring for the child / children
Chi-square1860.465
df (degrees of freedom)16
Relevance.000*

Assessment of the possibility of separating work and private time (according to education, place of living)

EducationPlace of living
Less than secondarySecondaryHigher vocational educationHigher educationVillageCity up to 50.000City 50.000-500.000City over 500.000
Definitely yes25.9%24.5%18.4%14.1%18.4%17.8%17.1%14.1%
Rather yes40.6%37.8%38.0%38.2%40.2%39.8%39.2%35.3%
Rather no14.4%19.3%23.8%26.0%23.2%22.9%22.9%26.9%
Definitely not10.4%12.8%14.3%17.8%14.2%14.2%15.4%19.9%
Hard to say8.6%5.6%5.5%3.9%4.0%5.2%5.3%3.8%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676
Pearson’s chi-square tests
EducationPlace of living
Chi-square157.71973.545
df (degrees of freedom)1212
Relevance.000*.000*

Assessment of childcare conditions in relation to the work performed (assessment according to indications on the list of prepared sentences; gender and age)

GenderAge
TotalFemaleMaleUp to 3031-40 years41-50 yearsOver 50 years
I adapt childcare to working conditions27.0%27.0%26.7%29.5%26.5%27.5%26.0%
I adapt my work to taking care of children37.3%36.8%41.7%38.1%40.6%34.6%26.8%
Working time - adjusting to the current conditions of functioning of schools and other care and educational institutions40.4%40.3%41.9%40.3%44.8%36.9%27.6%
I adjust the working time to the working time of other people who look after children17.1%16.4%24.0%27.8%19.3%14.7%15.4%
Neither sentence fits my situation21.6%21.6%22.0%17.6%18.3%24.5%30.1%
Overall7800706373717636453733246

Change in childcare involvement during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic time (education and place of living)

EducationPlace of living
less than secondarysecondary educationhigher vocational educationhigher educationvillagecity up to 50.000city 50.000 -500.000city over 500.000
16.8%3.6%3.0%3.2%3.8%3.4%3.6%2.9%
26.1%6.7%8.6%8.2%7.4%8.0%8.1%8.3%
330.2%27.8%26.2%26.4%26.3%29.0%27.1%25.6%
422.3%27.7%28.6%30.4%27.7%27.8%29.1%32.1%
534.5%34.3%33.5%31.7%34.7%31.8%32.2%31.1%
Overall278120074055821986142517132676
Pearson’s chi-square tests
EducationPlace of living
Chi-square 28.42523.424
df (degrees of freedom) 1212
Relevance.005*.024*
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2022-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2449-8939 | Journal ISSN: 2449-8920
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 64
Published on: Aug 8, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Małgorzata Marzec, Agnieszka Szczudlińska-Kanoś, Bożena Freund, Astrida Miceikienė, published by Jagiellonian University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.