Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science Cover

The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. Adams, R.J., Smart, P., & Huff, A.S. (2017). Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19, 432–454.
  2. Atkinson, L., & Cipriani, A. (2018). How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide. BJPsych Advances, 24(2), 74–82.
  3. Bassi, H., Lee, C.J., Misener, L., & Johnson, A.M. (2020). Exploring the characteristics of crowdsourcing: an online observational study. Journal of Information Science, 46(3), 291–312.
  4. Boell, S.K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 257–286.
  5. Bramer, W.M., de Jonge,, G.B.., Rethlefsen L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531–541.
  6. Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O.H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(245), 1–12.
  7. Breretona, P., Kitchenhama, B.A., Budgenb, D., Turnera, M., & Khalilc, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583.
  8. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43.
  9. Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57–61.
  10. Czakon, W., Klimas, P., & Kawa, A. (2019). Krótkowzroczność strategiczna – metodyczne aspekty systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 7(2), 27–37.
  11. Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, 1–9.
  12. Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D.A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  13. Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003). How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technology Assessment, 7(1), 1–76.
  14. Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22, 338–342.
  15. Ferguson, C.J., & Brannick, M.T. (2012). Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 120–128.
  16. Fusar-Poli, P., Radua, J. (2018). Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 21, 95–100.
  17. Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(8), 1–9.
  18. Greenhalgh, T. & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal, 331, 1064–1065.
  19. Hiebl, M.R.W. (2021). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1094428120986851.
  20. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired, 14.
  21. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2016). The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic, reviews and meta-analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 485–514.
  22. Kastner, M., Straus, S.E., McKibbon, K.A., & Goldsmith, C.H. (2009). The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(2), 149–157.
  23. Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., Moher, D. (2012). Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1(1), 1–10.
  24. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.
  25. Klimas, P., Czakon, W., & Fredrich, V. (2021). Strategy frames in coopetition: An examination of coopetition entry factors in high-tech firms. European Management Journal, https://www-1sciencedirect-1com-13wmmwumo09f7.hps.bj.uj.edu.pl/science/article/pii/S0263237321000554#bib28
  26. Klimas, P., Stańczyk, S., & Sachpazidu-Wójcicka, K. (2020). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury – wyzwania selekcji a posteriori podczas tworzenia bazy literatury. In Sopińska, A., & Modliński, A. (Eds). Współczesne zarządzanie – koncepcje i wyzwania, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa.
  27. Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal”, 16(3), 1023–1042.
  28. Lakhani, K., Jeppesen, L., Lohse, P., & Panetta, J. (2007). The value of openness in scientific problem solving, Working Paper, 07-050. Harvard Business School.
  29. Lenart-Gansiniec, R., (2021). Systematyczny przegląd literatury w naukach społecznych. Przewodnik dla studentów, doktorantów i nie tylko. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
  30. Linnenluecke, M.K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A.K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.
  31. Moher, D., Liberati, A., & Tetzlaff, J.A.D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Medicine”, 3(2), 123–130.
  32. Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(43), 879–910.
  33. Palmatier, R.W., Houston, M.B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, 46(1), 1–5.
  34. Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27, 114–122.
  35. Paré, G., & Templier, M. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(6), 112–137.
  36. Petrosino, A., Boruch, R.F., Soydan, H., Duggan, L., Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001), Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 14–34.
  37. Petticrew, M., Roberts, H. (2012). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide (12th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
  38. Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(13), 1–13.
  39. Rojon, C., McDowall, A., & Saunders, M.N.K. (2011). On the experience of conducting a systematic review in industrial, work, and organizational psychology: yes, it is worthwhile. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10(3), 133–138.
  40. Shaffril, H.A.M., Samah, A.A., & Samsuddin S.F. (2021). Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 22265–2227.
  41. Shelby, L.B., & Vaske, J.J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 96–110.
  42. Short, J.C., Sharma, P., Lumpkin, G.T., & Pearson, A.W. (2016). Oh, the places we’ll go! reviewing past, present, and future possibilities in family business research. Family Business Review, 29(1), 11–16.
  43. Short, J. (2009). The art of writing a review article. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1312–1317.
  44. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
  45. Torraco, R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
  46. Uhlmann, E.L., Ebersole, C.R., Chartier, C.R., Errington, T.M., Kidwell, M.C., Lai, C.K., McCarthy, R.J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B.A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733.
  47. Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
  48. Williams, R.I., Clark, L.A., Clark, W.R., & Raffo, D.M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal, 39(4), 521–533.
  49. Xiao, Y, Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2449-8939 | Journal ISSN: 2449-8920
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 21
Published on: Jul 13, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, published by Jagiellonian University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.