Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ON MPIIFACEGAZE (°)
| model | Average angular error |
|---|---|
| L2CS-Net[7] | 3.92 |
| CA-Net[4] | 4.10 |
| GazeTR[6] | 4.00 |
| MPIIGaze[2] | 5.40 |
| AGE-Net[5] | 4.09 |
| Dilated-Net[3] | 4.10 |
| Res-Swin-Ge[8] | 3.75 |
| RT-Gene[9] | 4.36 |
| Ours model | 3.72 |
COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ON GAZE360 (°)
| model | Average angular error |
|---|---|
| Full-Face[10] | 14.99 |
| CA-Net[4] | 11.20 |
| GazeTR[6] | 10.67 |
| Gaze360[13] | 11.04 |
| Dilated-Net[3] | 13.73 |
| Bot2L-Net[12] | 11.53 |
| RT-Gene[9] | 12.26 |
| Ours model | 10.46 |