Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
COMPARISON OF THE METHOD IN THIS PAPER AND TRADITIONAL K-MEANS RESULTS
| Method | Eigenvalue mean relative error/% | Cluster average accuracy/% | Average time/s | SAFDdiff/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional K-means clustering | 8.1 | 93 | 215 | 2.12 |
| Clustering of this article | 4.6 | 98 | 127 | 1.17 |
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT LOAD MATRIX
| Characteristic parameters | M1 | M2 | M3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deceleration time ratio Td/% | 0.323 | 0.351 | -0.223 |
| Driving Clustering S/km | 0.893 | 0.234 | 0.065 |
| Run time T/S | 0.782 | 0.251 | -0.342 |
| Acceleration time ratio Ta/% | 0.396 | -0.186 | 0.061 |
| Cruise time ratio Tc/% | 0.641 | 0.335 | -0.075 |
| Average speed Va/(km·h−1) | 0.499 | 0.763 | 0.125 |
| Deceleration time ratio Vd/(km·−1) | 0.778 | 0.415 | 0.132 |
| Speed standard deviation Vstd/(km·h−1) | 0.498 | 0.333 | 0.054 |
| Acceleration standard deviation astd/(km·−1) | 0.125 | 0.267 | -0.077 |
| Average acceleration aa/(m·s−2) | 0.024 | 0.523 | 0.053 |
| Average deceleration aa/(m·s−2) | 0.266 | -0.433 | -0.059 |
| Idle time ratio Ti/(m·s−2) | 0.165 | -0.351 | 0.853 |