Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
the Categorizations of the MSP and MPP Instances
| ID | Technique | MSP | MPP | TIP | TVP | Year of Birth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSP | N | Y | N | Y | 1978 |
| 2 | Ada | Y | N | Y | N | 1980 |
| 3 | Emerald | Y | N | Y | N | 1985 |
| 4 | Linda | Y | N | Y | N | 1986 |
| 5 | Erlang | N | Y | Y | N | 1986 |
| 6 | LabVIEW | N | Y | Y | N | 1986 |
| 7 | Hermes | N | Y | N | Y | 1986 |
| 8 | SR | Y | N | Y | N | 1988 |
| 9 | Concurrent Smalltalk-90 | N | Y | Y | N | 1989 |
| 10 | Haskell | Y | N | Y | N | 1990 |
| 11 | Janus | N | Y | Y | N | 1990 |
| 12 | CORBA | Y | N | Y | N | 1991 |
| 13 | MPI | N | Y | Y | N | 1991 |
| 14 | Oz | N | Y | N | Y | 1991 |
| 15 | SHMEM | Y | N | Y | N | 1993 |
| 16 | CML | N | Y | N | Y | 1993 |
| 17 | Glenda | Y | N | Y | N | 1994 |
| 18 | Limbo | N | Y | Y | N | 1995 |
| 19 | Millepede | Y | N | Y | N | 1996 |
| 20 | Joule | N | Y | Y | N | 1996 |
| 21 | E | Y | N | Y | N | 1997 |
| 22 | MPJ | N | Y | N | Y | 1999 |
| 23 | MPD | Y | N | Y | N | 2000 |
| 24 | SALSA | N | Y | Y | N | 2001 |
| 25 | CAL | N | Y | Y | N | 2001 |
| 26 | D | N | Y | N | Y | 2001 |
| 27 | X10 | Y | N | Y | N | 2004 |
| 28 | JoCaml | N | Y | N | Y | 2004 |
| 29 | JCSP | N | Y | N | Y | 2005 |
| 30 | PyCSP | N | Y | N | Y | 2006 |
| 31 | Akka | N | Y | Y | N | 2009 |
| 32 | Go | N | Y | Y | N | 2009 |
| 33 | Axum | N | Y | Y | N | 2009 |
| 34 | Bloom | Y | N | Y | N | 2010 |
| 35 | Rust | N | Y | N | Y | 2010 |
| 36 | Ateji PX | N | Y | Y | N | 2010 |
| 37 | Elixir | N | Y | Y | N | 2011 |
| 38 | Julia | N | Y | N | Y | 2012 |
| 39 | Akka.NET | N | Y | Y | N | 2013 |
the Summary of the MSP and the MPP
| Paradigm | Proportion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39(100%) | 1970s | 1980s | 1990s | 2000s | |
| MSP | 13(33%) | 0(0%) | 4(10%) | 6(15%) | 3(8%) |
| MPP | 26(67%) | 1(3%) | 4(10%) | 7(18%) | 14(36%) |
| TIP | 28(72%) | 0(0%) | 7(18%) | 26(23%) | 11(28%) |
| TVP | 11(28%) | 1(3%) | 1(3%) | 3(8%) | 6(15%) |
| MSP & TIP | 13(33%) | 0(0%) | 4(10%) | 6(15%) | 3(8%) |
| MSP & TVP | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) |
| MPP & TIP | 15(39%) | 0(0%) | 4(10%) | 3(8%) | 8(21%) |
| MPP & TVP | 11(28%) | 1(3%) | 1(3%) | 3(8%) | 6(15%) |
The Categorizations of the PPP Instances
| ID | Technique | MSP | MPP | TIP | TVP | Year of Birth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Id | Y | N | Y | N | 1975 |
| 2 | Sisal | Y | N | N | Y | 1983 |
| 3 | Occam | N | Y | N | Y | 1983 |
| 4 | Multilisp | Y | N | Y | N | 1985 |
| 5 | Newsqueak | N | Y | N | Y | 1985 |
| 6 | ParLog | Y | N | Y | N | 1987 |
| 7 | C* | Y | N | Y | N | 1987 |
| 8 | Joyce | N | Y | N | Y | 1987 |
| 9 | SequenceL | Y | N | Y | N | 1989 |
| 10 | Charm++ | N | Y | Y | N | 1989 |
| 11 | Lustre | Y | N | Y | N | 1991 |
| 12 | HPF | Y | N | Y | N | 1991 |
| 13 | Alef | N | Y | N | Y | 1992 |
| 14 | ZPL | Y | N | Y | N | 1993 |
| 15 | SuperPascal | N | Y | N | Y | 1993 |
| 16 | OpenMP | Y | N | Y | N | 1997 |
| 17 | Titanium | Y | N | Y | N | 1998 |
| 18 | UPC | Y | N | Y | N | 1999 |
| 19 | BMDFM | Y | N | Y | N | 2002 |
| 20 | CnC | Y | N | Y | N | 2004 |
| 21 | XC | N | Y | N | Y | 2005 |
| 22 | Fortress | Y | N | N | Y | 2006 |
| 23 | Sequoia++ | Y | N | Y | N | 2006 |
| 24 | Preesm | N | Y | Y | N | 2008 |
| 25 | Chapel | Y | N | Y | N | 2009 |
| 26 | C++AMP | Y | N | Y | N | 2011 |
The Summary of the PPP
| Paradigm | Proportion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26(100%) | 1970s | 1980s | 1990s | 2000s | |
| MSP | 18(69%) | 1(4%) | 5(19%) | 6(23%) | 6(23%) |
| MPP | 8(31%) | 0(0%) | 4(15%) | 2(8%) | 2(8%) |
| TIP | 18(69%) | 1(4%) | 5(19%) | 6(23%) | 6(23%) |
| TVP | 8(31%) | 0(0%) | 4(15%) | 2(8%) | 2(8%) |
| MSP & TIP | 16(62%) | 1(4%) | 4(15%) | 6(23%) | 5(19%) |
| MSP & TVP | 2(8%) | 0(0%) | 1(4%) | 0(0%) | 1(4%) |
| MPP & TIP | 2(8%) | 0(0%) | 1(4%) | 0(0%) | 1(4%) |
| MPP & TVP | 6(23%) | 0(0%) | 3(12%) | 2(8%) | 1(4%) |