Figure 1.

图 1

Literature correspondence alignment algorithm analysis
| Approach | Problem | Literature number |
|---|---|---|
| P-FA | The problem of matching the frame data and the frame count when the frame is lost is not solved | [13] |
| Large amount of calculation, not easy to promote | [19] | |
| P-TCMA | The number of data positions is wrong when the frame is dropped | [18] |
| Data transmission delay is not considered | [12] | |
| P-ECA | Depends on device index value | [16] |
| Frame count error has not been resolved | [10] | |
| No consideration of transmission delay | [4] | |
| Large amount of calculation, not easy to promote | [3] |
Literature correspondence algorithm analysis table
| Approach | Problem | Literature number |
|---|---|---|
| PSF-QEA | Data error does not affect the frame length, causing quality misjudgment. | [18] |
| To solve the judgment error caused by dropped frames | [6] | |
| PFF-QEA | Unsolved the problem of different comparison results caused by dropped frames and errors | [20] |
| The assessment basis is relatively simple | [10] | |
| Not given due to frame loss | [3] | |
| Data preprocessing requirements are high, and the incomplete F-frame data is discarded, which is not conducive to the full use of data. | [5] | |
| PSF-QEA | The calculation is cumbersome and not easy to promote | [11] |
| Cluster center radius is not easy to choose | [6] |
累积错误对齐过程表
| 帧序号 | 测站 A | 测站 B | 融合结果 | 正确 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28586 | 65530 | 28586 | 65530 |
| 2 | 65531 | 65467 | 65467 | 65531 |
| 3 | 65532 | 65356 | 65356 | 65532 |
| 4 | 65523 | 65533 | 65523 | 65533 |
Literature Corresponding QEA Analysis
| Approach | Problem | Literature number |
|---|---|---|
| FF-QEA | The system overhead is large, and when the amount of data increases, the information is too late to process. | [14] |
| Accurate quality evaluation when errors occur in unresolved frame counts | [8] | |
| SF-QEA | Increased algorithm time complexity | [2] |
实时选优算法统计表
| 处理方法 | 问题 | 文献编号 |
|---|---|---|
| 基于全帧的实时质量评估算法 | 系统开销大,数据量增大时,信息来不及处理 | [14] |
| 未解决帧计数出现误码时的精确质量评估 | [8] | |
| 基于子帧的实时质量评估算法 | 算法时间复杂度增加 | [2] |
事后选优算法统计表
| 处理方法 | 问题 | 文献编号 |
|---|---|---|
| 基于选段的事后质量评估算法 | 数据误码并不 影响帧长度,造成质量误判。 | [18] |
| 为解决丢帧引起的评判失误 | [6] | |
| 基于全帧的事后质量评估算法 | 未解决丢帧误码引起的对比结果均不相同的问题 | [20] |
| 评估依据较为单一 | [10] | |
| 未给出丢帧引起的 | [3] | |
| 数据预处理要求较高,丢弃残缺的全帧数据,不利于数据的充分利用。 | [5] | |
| 基于子帧的事后质量评估算法 | 计算繁琐,不易推广 | [11] |
| 聚类中心半径不易选取 | [6] |
Accumulative error alignment process
| Frame number | GS1 | GS2 | Fusion result | Correct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28586 | 65530 | 28586 | 65530 |
| 2 | 65531 | 65467 | 65467 | 65531 |
| 3 | 65532 | 65356 | 65356 | 65532 |
| 4 | 65523 | 65533 | 65523 | 65533 |
事后对齐算法统计表
| 处理方法 | 问题 | 文献编号 |
|---|---|---|
| 事后标志位对齐 | 未解决丢帧时的帧数据与帧计数的匹配问题 | [13] |
| 计算量大,不易于推广 | [19] | |
| 事后时码匹 配对齐 | 丢帧时数据位置数出错 | [18] |
| 未考虑数据传输时延 | [12] | |
| 事后误差控 制对齐 | 依赖设备指标值 | [16] |
| 帧计数误码尚未解决 | [10] | |
| 未考虑传输时延 | [4] | |
| 计算量较大,不易于推广 | [3] |
实时对齐算法统计表
| 处理方法 | 问题 | 文献编号 |
|---|---|---|
| 实时标志位 对齐 | 帧计数误码影响较大 | [21] |
| 累积错误 | [8] | |
| 实时时码匹配对齐 | ||
| 未考虑主站传输时延 | [21] | |
| 实时误差控 制对齐 | 子帧时码延时计算未解决 | [14] |
| 依赖设备指标值 | [2] |