References
- Abreu, R., Antunes, J., Escada, M., Pádua, M., & Teresa, M. (2023, September). R&D Cooperation and Innovation Networks: Lessons From SME Participation in H2020. In ECKM 2023 24th European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol 1). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
- Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one?: Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research policy, 37(5), 806–822.
- Almus, M., & Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226–236.
- Åström, T., Jansson, T., Melin, G., Håkansson, A., Boekholt, P., & Arnold, E. (2012). On motives for participation in the Framework Programme. Technopolis Group.
- Åström, T., Brown, N., Mahieu, B., Håkansson, A., Varnai, P., & Arnold, E. (2017). Norwegian participation in Horizon 2020 in health, ICT and industry: A study on the potential for increased participation. Technopolis Group.
- Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of management journal, 43(5), 909–924.
- Basosi, R., Ceracchi, M., D’Amore, F., Finardi, G., Masulli, M., Pocaterra, C. (2021). L’impatto della partecipazione al programma horizon 2020 sulle imprese italiane: un’analisi per il settore energia. Zenodo.
- Bērziņa, D. (2020, April). Baltic-Nordic Universities in the EU Research and Innovation Programme Horizon 2020. In 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20) (No. 30-05-2020, pp. 255–263). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
- Børing, P., Fevolden, A. M., Mark, M. S., & Piro, F. N. (2020). Bringing home the bacon: the relationship between firm characteristics and participation in EU Horizon 2020 projects. Applied Economics Letters, 27(19), 1556–1561.
- Bralić, A. (2017). Social network analysis of country participation in Horizon 2020 Programme. In Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems (pp. 285–291). Faculty of Organization and Informatics Varazdin.
- Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442–457.
- Busom, I., & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2008). The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research policy, 37(2), 240–257.
- Callejon, M., & García-Quevedo, J. (2005). Public subsidies to business R&D: do they stimulate private expenditures?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(2), 279–293.
- Catozzella, A., & Vivarelli, M. (2011). Beyond additionality: Are innovation subsidies counterproductive? IZA Discussion Paper No. 5746. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Cerulli, G., & Poti, B. (2008). Evaluating the effect of public subsidies of Firm R & D activity: An application to Italy using the community innovation survey. Rome, Italy: Ceris-CNR.
- Cerulli, G., & Poti, B. (2012). Evaluating the robustness of the effect of public subsidies on firms’ R&D: an application to Italy. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2), 287–320.
- Coad, A., Holm, J. R., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2018). Firm age and performance. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 1–11.
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
- Čučković, N., & Vučković, V. (2021). The effects of EU R&I funding on SME innovation and business performance in new EU member states: Firm-level evidence. Economic Annals, 66(228), 7–42.
- Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2014). Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 380–409.
- Di Minin, A., De Marco, C. E., & Karaulova, M. (2016). SME Instrument–so far so good. Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, (4).
- Enger, S. G. (2018). Closed clubs: Network centrality and participation in Horizon 2020. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 884–896.
- Enger, S. G., & Castellacci, F. (2016). Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis. Scientometrics, 109, 1611–1638.
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2024). European Innovation Scoreboard 2024. Publications Office of the European Union.
- Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M. P., & Fuentelsaz, L. (2021). The European research landscape under the Horizon 2020 Lenses: The interaction between science centers, public institutions, and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(3), 828–853.
- Folea, V. (2017). EU Funding for Research and Innovation Actions in Horizon 2020. Global Economic Observer, 5(2), 23–30.
- Foreman-Peck, J. (2013). Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy. Small Business Economics, 41, 55–70.
- Gallo, F., Seniori Costantini, A., Puglisi, M. T., & Barton, N. (2021). Biomedical and health research: an analysis of country participation and research fields in the EU’s Horizon 2020. European journal of epidemiology, 36(12), 1209–1217.
- Garcia, A., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Impact of government support on R&D and innovation. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. UNU-MERIT Working Papers, No. 034.
- González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?. Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389.
- Gussoni, M., & Mangani, A. (2010). R&D cooperation, appropriability and public funding: an empirical investigation. Research Policy, 39(10), 1451–1462.
- Hanel, P. (2008). Productivity and innovation: an overview of the issues. Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie.
- Hashi, I., & Stojčić, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366.
- Heimonen, T. (2012). What are the factors that affect innovation in growing SMEs? European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 122–144.
- Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. Journal of applied econometrics, 23(6), 729–747.
- Kalisz, D. E., & Aluchna, M. (2012). Research and innovation redefined. Perspectives on the European union initiatives on horizon 2020. European integration studies, (6).
- Kim, J., & Yoo, J. (2019). Science and technology policy research in the EU: from Framework Programme to HORIZON 2020. Social Sciences, 8(5), 153.
- Mabenge, B. K., Ngorora-Madzimure, G. P. K., & Makanyeza, C. (2022). Dimensions of innovation and their effects on the performance of small and medium enterprises: The moderating role of firm’s age and size. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(6), 684–708.
- Mulier, K., & Samarin, I. (2021). Sector heterogeneity and dynamic effects of innovation subsidies: Evidence from Horizon 2020. Research Policy, 50(10), 104346.
- Mulligan, K., Lenihan, H., & Doran, J. (2019). More subsidies, more innovation? Evaluating whether a mix of subsidies from regional, national and EU sources crowds out firm-level innovation. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 130–138.
- Murea, M. M. (2013). Towards what Horizon is EU headed by 2020?. An overview of the new EU financial program. Romanian Economic Journal, 16, 50.
- Piątkowski, M. (2020). Implementation of innovations in enterprises using the EU funds: A comparative analysis. Journal of International Studies, 13(2), 109–126.
- Puukka, J. (2018). Spreading excellence & widening participation in Horizon 2020. Analysis of FP Participation Patterns and Research and Innovation Performance of Eligible Countries.
- Sekerci, D., & Alp, S. (2023). Investigation of European Union Horizon 2020 information and communication technology projects with the social network analysis method. Engineering, technology & applied science research, 13(4), 11182–11190.
- Simonelli, F. (2016). Is Horizon 2020 Really More SME-friendly?: A Look at the Figures. Centre for European Policy Studies.
- Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.
- Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10–21.
- Tenhunen-Lunkka, A., & Honkanen, R. (2024). Project coordination success factors in European Union-funded research, development and innovation projects under the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe programmes. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 7.
- Veugelers, R. (2008). The role of SMEs in innovation in the EU: A case for policy intervention. Review of business and economics, 53(3), 239–262.
- Veugelers, R., Cincera, M., Frietsch, R., Leijten, J., Montalvo, C., Pelle, A., Rammer, C., Renda, A., & Schubert, T. (2015). The impact of horizon 2020 on innovation in Europe. Intereconomics, 50(1), 4–30.
- Vidmar, U., & Vukasović, T. (2019). A model for a successful approach to applying for Horizon 2020. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 10(1), 26–52.
- Wanzenböck, I., Lata, R., & Ince, D. (2020). Proposal success in Horizon 2020: A study of the influence of consortium characteristics. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1136–1158.