Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Addressing the Green and Digital Transition in Third Mission Projects Cover

Addressing the Green and Digital Transition in Third Mission Projects

By:
Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. Andersen, A. D., K. Frenken, V. Galaz, F. Kern, L. Klerkx, M. Mouthaan, L. Piscicelli, J. B. Schor and T. Vaskelainen (2021), On digitalization and sustainability transitions, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 96-98.
  2. Bernert, P., A. Haaser, L. Kühl and T. Schaal (2016), Towards a Real-world Laboratory: A Transdisciplinary Case Study from Lüneburg, GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 253-259.
  3. Carayannis, E. G., E. Grigoroudis, D. F. J. Campbell, D. Meissner and D. Stamati (2018), The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models, R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162.
  4. Carayannis, E. G. and R. Rakhmatullin (2014), The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239.
  5. Compagnucci, L. and F. Spigarelli (2020), The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284.
  6. Edler, J. and W. P. Boon (2018), The next generation of innovation policy: Directionality and the role of demand-oriented instruments—Introduction to the special section, Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 433-434.
  7. European Commission (2019), The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final.
  8. European Commission (2021), Green and digital ‘twin’ transition also spurs inclusive ‘eco-recovery’ mindset in waste management, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/about-eco-innovation/policies-matters/green-and-digital-twin-transition-also-spurs-inclusive-eco_en (13 April 2022).
  9. Ferraris, A., Z. Belyaeva and S. Bresciani (2020), The role of universities in the Smart City innovation: Multistakeholder integration and engagement perspectives, Journal of Business Research, 119, 163-171.
  10. Gossen, M., F. Rohde and T. Santarius (2021), A Marriage Story of Digitalisation and Sustainability?, Ökologisches Wirtschaften – Fachzeitschrift, 36(O1), 4-8.
  11. Hilty, L. M. and B. Aebischer (2015), ICT innovations for sustainability. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 310, Springer.
  12. Hirschmann, D., D. Feser and S. J. Winkler-Portmann (2022), Intermediaries and the Challenges of Directionality in Regional Innovation Policy Programs for Sustainability Transitions, SSRN Electronic Journal.
  13. HNE Eberswalde (2016), Transferstrategie der Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberwalde: Ideen‐ und Wissenstransfer für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung.
  14. Hochschule Darmstadt (2019), Systeminnovation für Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Transfer als Lernprozess in der Region (SNE).
  15. Hochschule Darmstadt (2022), Bürgerpanel, Hochschule Darmstadt / University of Applied Sciences, https://buergerpanel.h-da.de/ (9 April 2022).
  16. Klewitz, J. and E. G. Hansen (2014), Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75.
  17. Lindner, R. et al. (2016), Addressing directionality: Orientation failure and the systems of innovation heuristic. Towards reflexive governance, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers – Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 52.
  18. Markard, J., R. Raven and B. Truffer (2012), Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects, Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967.
  19. Nambisan, S., M. Wright and M. Feldman (2019), The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes, Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
  20. Nölting, B., H. Molitor, J. Reimann, J.-H. Skrobli and N. Dembski (2020), Transfer for Sustainable Development at Higher Education Institutions—Untapped Potential for Education for Sustainable Development and for Societal Transformation, Sustainability, 12(7), 2925.
  21. Puente, C., M. E. Fabra, C. Mason, C. Puente-Rueda, M. A. Sáenz-Nuño and R. Viñuales (2021), Role of the Universities as Drivers of Social Innovation, Sustainability, 13(24), 13727.
  22. Roessler, I. (2015), Third Mission. Die ergänzende Mission neben Lehre und Forschung, wissenschaftsmanagement, 2, 46-47.
  23. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. and P. Benneworth (2019), Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university’s structural configuration on third mission performance, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 206-218.
  24. Schneidewind, U. (2016), Die “Third Mission” zur “First Mission” machen?, die hochschule, 1, 14-22.
  25. Scholz, R. W. (2020), Transdisciplinarity: science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions, Sustainability Science, 15, 1033-1049.
  26. Schot, J. and W. E. Steinmueller (2018), Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567.
  27. Trencher, G., M. Yarime, K. B. McCormick, C. N. H. Doll and S. B. Kraines (2014), Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability, Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 151-179.
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 91
Published on: Apr 2, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:

© 2023 Daniel Feser, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.