Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The increasing role of the Charter when establishing the ‘genuine enjoyment’ test for static EU citizens – A result of the ECHR’s shortcomings? Cover

The increasing role of the Charter when establishing the ‘genuine enjoyment’ test for static EU citizens – A result of the ECHR’s shortcomings?

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. BOSNIAK, L., The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership, 2006, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press10.1515/9781400827510
  2. COSTELLO, Cathryn, The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law, Oxford Studies in European Law, Oxford, UK, 201610.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644742.001.0001
  3. DRAGHICI, Carmen, The Legitimacy of Family Rights in Strasbourg Case Law ‘Living Instrument’ or Extinguishing Sovereignty? Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2017
  4. EDLUND, Jennie and STEHLÍK, Václav, ‘The uncertain place of the child’s best interests in ECtHR’s immigration case law’ International and Comparative Law Review, ICLR, 2020, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 93–112. DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2020-001910.2478/iclr-2020-0019
  5. EDLUND, Jennie and STEHLÍK, Václav, The Influence of EU Law in ECtHR’s Case Law on Family Migration, Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law, 2021, vol. 12
  6. EDLUND, Jennie and STEHLÍK, Václav, Is the assessment under Article 8 ECHR for migrants justifiable? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2021, vol. 29 Issue 110.1177/1023263X211061435
  7. FERRI, Delia and MARTINICO, Giuseppe, Revisiting the Ruiz Zambrano Doctrine and Exploring the Potential for its Extensive Application, European Public Law, 2021, Vol. 2710.2139/ssrn.3799922
  8. GUILD, Elspeth, EU Citizens, Foreign Family Members and European Union Law, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol 21, 201910.1163/15718166-12340055
  9. HAILBRONNER, K. and THYM, D., Case C-34/09, Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v. Office National de l’emploi (ONEm), Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2011’’, 48 CML Rev., 1253–127010.54648/COLA2011048
  10. HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej, MAZÁK Ján. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union vis-à-vis the Member States – Scope of its Application in the View of the CJEU. Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 161–172, ISSN 1805-0565.
  11. INGLESIAS SÁNCHEZ, Sara, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship of the Union at a Crossroads: A Promising Alliance or a Dangerous Liaison? European Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, 201410.1111/eulj.12094
  12. KILKELY, Ursula, The Child and the European Convention of Human Rights, Aldershot, Ashgate/Dartmouth,1999
  13. KOCHENOV, D., EU citizenship: From an incipient form to an incipient substance?, 37 European Law Review, 2012, 369–396
  14. KOCHENOV, D., The Right to Have What Rights? EU Citizenship in Need of Clarification’ (2013) 9 European Law Journal, 2013, 50210.1111/eulj.12043
  15. KROEZE, Hester, Distinguishing between use and abuse of EU free movement law: Evaluating use of the “Europe-route” for family reunification to overcome reverse discrimination, European Papers, vol. 3, 2018
  16. KROEZE, H., The Substance of Rights: New Pieces of the Ruiz Zambrano Puzzle, 44(2) European Law Review, 2019, 238–256
  17. KROEZE, Hester and VAN ELSUWEGE, Peter, Revisiting Ruiz Zambrano: A never Ending Story? European Journal of Migration and Law 23, 202110.1163/15718166-12340091
  18. LENAERTS, Koen, Linking EU Citizenship to Democracy, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Polic,y 2015,Editorial to Volume 1110.3935/cyelp.11.2015.235
  19. MILIOS, G., 25 International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 201810.1163/15718115-02503001
  20. O’LEARY, S., ‘The Relationship between Community Citizenship and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Community Law’, 32 Common Market Law Review 519, 199510.54648/COLA1995023
  21. SCHOTEL, B. Schotel, On the Right of Exclusion: Law, Ethics and Immigration Policy, Routledge, 201210.4324/9780203802922
  22. SHUIBNE, N Nic, Free Movement of Persons and the Wholly Internal Rule: Time to Move On? 39 (4) Common Market Law Review, 200210.54648/5095075
  23. SHUIBHNE, Nic, ‘What I Tell You Three Times is True: Lawful residence and equal treatment after Dano, 2016, 23 Maastricht Journal 90810.1177/1023263X1602300602
  24. SIMON, Miranda et. al., A data-driven computational model on the effects of immigration policies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (34), 2018.10.1073/pnas.1800373115
  25. SNELL, Jukka, Do fundamental rights determine the scope of EU law? European Law Review, 2018, 475–476
  26. SPAVENTA, E, Seeing the Wood despite the Trees? On the Scope of Union Citizenship and its Constitutional Effects 45 (1) Common Market Law Review, 200810.54648/COLA2008002
  27. THYM, Daniel, Respect for private and family life under Article 8 ECHR in Immigration cases: Human Right to regularize illegal stay? 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2008, pp. 87–11210.1017/S0020589308000043
  28. VAN BUREN, Geraldine, Child Rights in Europe: Convergence and Divergence in Judicial Protection, Strasbourg Council of Europe Publishing, 2007
  29. VAN EIJKEN, H. and DE VRIES, S., A New Route into the Promised Land? Being a European Citizen after Ruiz Zambrano, 36 European Law Review, 2011, 704–721
  30. VAN EIJKEN, Hanneke and PHOA, Pauline, The scope of Article 20 TFEU clarified in Chavez-Vilchez: are the fundamental rights of minor EU citizens coming of age? European Law Review, 2018, 43(6), 949–970
  31. VAN EIJKEN, Hanneke, Connecting the Dots Backwards, What Did Ruiz Zambrano Mean for EU Citizenship and Fundamental Rights in EU Law? European Journal of Migration and Law 23, 202110.1163/15718166-12340094
  32. VAN ELSUWEGE, P., European Union Citizenship and the Purely Internal Rule Revisited’, European Constitutional Law Review, 7, 2011, 308–32410.1017/S1574019611200099
  33. Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, OJ [2007] C303/17
  34. Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member state[…] (Citizenship Directive) [2004] OJ L158/77.
  35. ECtHR Useinov v. Netherlands, Judgement of 11 April 2006, Application No. 61292/00 Case C-400/10 McB [2010] ECR I-8965
  36. Case C-135/08 Rottmann [2010] ECR-I-1449
  37. Case C-434/09 Mc Carty v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] ECR I-03375.
  38. Case C-34/09) Ruiz Zambrano v. Office national de l’emploi EU:C:2011:124; [2011] 2 C.M.L.R. 46
  39. Case C-256/11 Murat Dereci and Others v. Bundesministerium für Inneres [2011] ECR I-11315
  40. Cases C-356/11, C-357/11 O, S v Maahanmuuttovirasto, Maahanmuuttovirasto v L [2012] EU:C:2012:776
  41. Case C-617/10 Åklagaren v. Fransson EU:C:2013:105
  42. Case C-165/14 Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado [2016] EU:C:2016:675
  43. Case C-304/14 CS, Judgement of 13 September 2016
  44. Case C-133/15 H.C. Chavez-Vilchez and Others v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank and others [2017] EU: C:2017:354
  45. Case C-82/16 KA and others v Belgium Judgment of 8 May 2018
  46. Opinion of AG Sharpston EU:C:2010:560
  47. Opinion of AG Wathelet delivered the 14 April 2016 in the NA case (C-115/15) EU:C:2016:259
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2022-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 138
Published on: Mar 1, 2023
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Jennie Edlund, Václav Stehlik, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.