Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality Cover

“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. AHMED, Farhaan Uddin. Right to be forgotten: a critique of the post-Costeja Gonzalez paradigm. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2015, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 175–185. 2015. Available at: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/253527
  2. ANDRAŠKO, Jozef and MESARČÍK, Matúš. Those Who Shall Be Identified: The Data Protection Aspects of the Legal Framework for Electronic Identification in the European Union. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 3–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0012.
  3. CARTER, Edward L. The Right To Be Forgotten. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 22 November 2016. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-189.
  4. CULIK, Nikolai; DÖPKE, Christian. About Forgetting and Being Forgotten. In HOEREN, Thomas, KOLANY-RAISER, Barbara (eds). Big Data in Context – Legal, Social and Technological Insights. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62461-7_3
  5. EICHENSEHR, Kristen. Data Extraterritoriality. Texas Law Review, 2017, vol. 96, pp. 145–160. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009774.
  6. FABBRINI, Federico and Edoardo CELESTE. The Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Age: The Challenges of Data Protection Beyond Borders. German Law Journal, 2020, vol. 21, no. S1, pp. 55–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.14.
  7. HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej, VARDANYAN, Lusine, KOCHARYAN, Hovsep. The Global Reach of the Right to be Forgotten through the Lenses of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2021, vol. 2021, no. 12, pp. 196–211.
  8. JONES, Meg Leta. Ctrl + Z: The Right to Be Forgotten. New York: NYU Press, 2016, 256 p. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1803zhx.
  9. KAGANOFF, Jay. Send the Word Over There: An Offshore Solution to the Right to Be Forgotten. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2021, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 245–271. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol41/iss2/4
  10. KOCHARYAN, Hovsep; VARDANYAN, Lusine; HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej; KERIKMÄE, Tanel. Critical Views on the Right to Be Forgotten After the Entry Into Force of the GDPR: Is it Able to Effectively Ensure Our Privacy? International and Comparative Law Review, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 96–115. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0015
  11. LAMBERT, Paul. The Right to Be Forgotten. London: Bloomsbury Professional, 2019, 544 p. Available at: https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/right-to-be-forgotten-9781526521958/.
  12. LIEVENS, Eva & VANDER Maelen, Carl. A Child’s Right to be Forgotten: Letting Go of the Past and Embracing the Future? Latin American Law Review, 2019, no. 2, pp. 61–79. Available at: https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/pdf/10.29263/lar02.2019.03.10.29263/lar02.2019.03
  13. MACH, Martin. Streisand Effect in the Context of the Right to be Forgotten. European Studies – the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, 2022, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 110–121, DOI: 10.2478/eustu-2022-0005.10.2478/eustu-2022-0005
  14. MARKS, Demi. The Internet Doesn’t Forget: Redefining Privacy Through an American Right to Be Forgotten. UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2016, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 41–64. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n00j4j310.5070/LR8231034309
  15. REES, Mark. Droit à l’oubli : l’effet Streisand peut être évité dans les décisions de la CJUE”. Nextimpact.com, 14 March 2017. Available at: https://www.nextinpact.com/article/25880/103671-droit-a-oubli-effet-streisand-peut-etre-evite-dans-decisions-cjue?fbclid=IwAR3KQQEmXTXq8ifKNeNl8y26xOAta-IfQHUrMkvzYfd5oJPrGD4ncBFzLLg
  16. SAMONTE, Mary. Google v CNIL Case C-507/17: The Territorial Scope of the Right to be Forgotten Under EU Law. European Law Blog, 29 October 2019. Available at: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2019/10/29/google-v-cnil-case-c-507-17-the-territorial-scope-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten-under-eu-law/.
  17. VAN HOBOKEN, Joris V.J. The Proposed Right to be Forgotten Seen from the Perspective of Our Right to Remember Freedom of Expression Safeguards in a Converging Information Environment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013, 30 p. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC86747.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2022-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 105 - 120
Published on: Mar 1, 2023
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Hovsep Kocharyan, Ondrej Hamuľák, Lusine Vardanyan, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.