Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Migrants’ Right to Respect for Family Life – The Problematic Developments of the European Court of Human Right’s Case Law Cover

A Migrants’ Right to Respect for Family Life – The Problematic Developments of the European Court of Human Right’s Case Law

Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. CARENS, Joseph. H. The Ethics of Immigration (Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2013
  2. CONNELLY, A., M. Problems of Interpretation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 35:3 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1986.10.1093/iclqaj/35.3.567
  3. COSTELLO, Cathryn. The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law, Oxford: Oxford Studies in European Law, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644742.001.0001
  4. DRAGHICI, Carmen. The Legitimacy of Family Rights in Strasbourg Case Law ‘Living Instrument’ or Extinguishing Sovereignty? Modern Studies in European Law, Hart Publishing, UK, 2017.
  5. EDLUND, Jennie, STEHLÍK, Václav. Is the assessment under Article 8 ECHR for migrants justifiable? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2021.10.1177/1023263X211061435
  6. EDLUND, Jennie, STEHLÍK, Václav. The influence of EU law in ECtHR’s case law on family migration, Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law, Vol. 12, 2021.
  7. FRESE, Amalie, OLSEN, PALMER, Henrik, ‘Spelling It Out−Convergence and Divergence in the Judicial Dialogue between CJEU and ECtHR’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 88, 2019.10.1163/15718107-08803001
  8. GERARDS, Janneke. How to improve the necessity test of the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law, 2013.10.1093/icon/mot004
  9. GERARDS, Janneke. Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine, 17 European Law Journal, 2011.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00540.x
  10. HENRARD, Kristin. A Critical Analysis of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine of the ECtHR, with Special Attention to Rights of a Traditional Way of Life and a Healthy Environment: A Call for an Alternative Model of International Supervision, The Year-book of Polar Law IV, Brill, 2012.10.1163/22116427-91000098
  11. KLAASSEN, Mark. Between facts and norms: Testing compliance with Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases, 37:2 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2019.10.1177/0924051919844387
  12. SCHEEK, Laurent. The relationship between the European Courts and Integration through Human Rights, 65 Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 2005.
  13. SPIJKERBOER, Thomas. Structural Instability: Strasbourg Case Law on Children’s Family Reunion, European Journal of Migration and Law 11, 2009.10.1163/138836409X12469435402855
  14. THYM, Daniel. Respect for private and family life under Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases: A human right to regularize illegal stay? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 57, 2008.10.1017/S0020589308000043
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 116 - 137
Published on: Mar 29, 2022
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Jennie Edlund, Václav Stehlík, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.