Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Conflict of Laws, Choice of the Forum Court in the us, and the Due Process in Family Law Disputes

By:
Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. ARMINJON, Pierre, E NOL‘DE, Boris, WOLFF, Martin. Traité de Droit comparé. Paris : Pichon & Durand-Auzias, 1950.
  2. HOLLINGER, Joan Heifetz, et al. Adoption Law and Practice. New York, Lexis Publishing, 2008, §§
  3. MCDOUGAL, Luther L. et al. American Conflicts Law. Fifth Edition. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff, 2001, pp. 1–1040.10.1163/9789004480520
  4. ZWEIGERT KONRAD, Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, translation from the German original: Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts. Third Edition. OXFORD: Tony Weir, 1998.
  5. APPLETON, Susan Frelich. Presuming Women: Revisiting the Presumption of Legitimacy in the Same-Sex Couples Era. Boston University Law Review, 2006, vol. 86, pp. 227–294.
  6. BARRETT, Ronald A. The Continuing Evolution of US judgements Recognition law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2017, vol. 55, pp. 277–342
  7. BORCHERS, Patrick J., The Essential Irrelevance of the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Chreighton Law Review, 2005, vol. 38, pp. 353–363.
  8. CARBONE, June, CAHN, Naomi. Which Ties Blind? Redefining the Parent-Child Relationship in an Age of Genetic Certainty. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2003, vol. 11, pp. 1011–1070.
  9. CARRUTHERS, Janeen M. Substance and Procedure in the Conflict of Laws: A Continuing Debate in Relation to Damages. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 691–711.10.1093/iclq/53.3.691
  10. COX, Stanley E. Nine Questions About Same-Sex Marriage Conflicts. New England Law Review, 2006 vol. 40, no.2, pp. 361–408.
  11. ENGDAHL, David. The Classic Rule of Faith and Credit. Yale Law Journal, 2009, vol. 118, pp. 1584–1659.
  12. FINEMAN, Martha Albertson. Our Sacred Institution: The Ideal of the Family in American Law and Society. Utah Law Review, 1993, vol. 1993, no. 2, pp. 387–405.
  13. GROSSMAN, Joanna L. Resurrecting Comity: Revisiting the Problem of Neo-Uniform Marriage Laws. Oregon Law Review, 2005, Vol. 84, pp. 433–488.
  14. HAMILTON, Vivian. Principles of U.S. Family Law. Fortham Law Review, 2006, vol. 75, pp. 31–73.10.2139/ssrn.896322
  15. HOGUE, L. Lynn. State Common-Law Choice-of-Law Doctrine and Same-Sex “Marriage”: How Will States Enforce the Public Policy Exception? Creighton Law Review, 1998, vol. 32, pp. 29–44.
  16. HOLLINGER, Joan Heifetz. The Uniform Adoption Act: Reporter’s Ruminations. Family Law Quarterly, 1996, vol. 30, pp. 345–378.
  17. JORAANSTAD, Thomas M. The Fifth Circuit Upholds Louisiana’s Refusal to Issue a Revised Birth Certificate. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 2013, vol. 19, pp. 432–444.
  18. KIRGIS, Frederic L. Jr. Roles of Due Process and Full Faith and Credit in Choice of Law. Cornell Law Review, 1976, vol. 62, pp. 94–150.
  19. KRAMER, Larry. Same-Sex Marriage, Conflict of Laws, and the Unconstitutional Public Policy Exception. Yale Law Journal, 1997, pp. 1965–2008.10.2307/797159
  20. KOPPELMAN, Andrew. Against Blanket Interstate Nonrecognition of Same-Sex Marriage. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 2005, vol. 17, pp. 205–219.
  21. MALMSTROM, Ake. The System of Legal Systems: Notes on a Problem of Classification in Comparative Law. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 1969, vol. 13, p. 127–149.
  22. SACHS, Stephen E. Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress. Virginia Law Review, 2009, vol. 95, pp. 1201–1279.
  23. SACK, Emily J. The Retreat From DOMA: The Public Policy of Same-Sex Marriage and a Theory of Congressional Power Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Creighton Law Review, 2005, vol. 38, pp. 101–125.
  24. SANDERS, Steve. Is the full faith and Credit Clause Still “Irrelevant” to Same-Sex Marriage? Toward a Reconsideration of the Conventional Wisdom. Indiana Law Journal, 2014, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 95–113.
  25. SANDERS, Steve. The Constitutional Right to (Keep Your) Same-sex Marriage. Michigan Law Review, 2012, vol. 110, pp. 1421–1482.10.2139/ssrn.1903386
  26. SHREVE, Gene R. Choice of Law and the Forgiving Constitution. Indiana Law Journal, 1996, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 271–296.
  27. SILBERMAN, Linda. Same – Sex Marriage: Refining the Conflict of Laws Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2005, vol. 153, pp. 2195–2214.10.2307/4150660
  28. SYMEONIDES, Symon C. Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2014. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2015, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 299–386.10.5131/AJCL.2015.0009
  29. TERRY, Pamela K. E Pluribus Unum? The Full Faith and Credit Clause and Meaningful Recognition of Out-of-State Adoptions. Fordham Law Review, 2012, vol. 80, pp. 3093–3135.10.2139/ssrn.2017812
  30. WARDLE, Lynn D. A Critical Analysis of Interstate Recognition of Lesbigay Adoptions. AVE MARIA Law Review, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 561–617.
  31. WARDLE, Lynn D. From Slavery to Same-Sex Marriage: Comity Versus Public Policy in Inter-jurisdictional Recognition of Controversial Domestic Relations. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018, vol. 2008, pp. 1855–1926.
  32. WASSERMAN, Rhonda. Are You Still My Mother? Interstate Recognition of Adoptions by Gays and Lesbians. American University Law Review, 2008, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–83.
  33. WHITTEN, Ralph U. Choice of Law, Jurisdiction and Judgement Issues in Interstate Adoption Cases. Capital University Law Review, 2003, vol. 31, pp, 803–851.
  34. EISENGRAEBER, Julia. Lis Alibi Pendens Under The Brussels I Regulation-How To Minimise-Torpedo Litigaiton – And Other Unwanted Effects Of The -Fisrt-Come First-Served Rule. Exeter Papers in European Law, 2004, no. 16, p. 5.
  35. RICHTER, Jeremy W. A Race Odyssey: Alabama’s Anti Miscegenation Statute is Repealed. [online]. Available at: .
  36. National Constitution Centre. On this day Supreme Court rejects anti inter racial marriage laws. [online]. Available at: .
  37. SACHS, Stephen E., SANDERS, Steve. Article IV, Section 1: Full Faith and Credit Clause. [online]. Available at:
  38. Adar v. Smith, 639 F 3d. 146, 2011.10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_79
  39. Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Epstein, 516 U. S. 367, 1996.
  40. Estin v. Estin 334 U. S. 541, 1948.
  41. Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1, 1967.
  42. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S., 2003.
  43. Baehr v. Lewin 852 P.2d 44, 74 Haw, 1993.10.2307/591230
  44. United States v. Windsor 133 S Ct. 2675, 2013.
  45. Obergefell v. Hodges 576 US, 2015.
  46. Baker v. Gen. Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222, 1998.
  47. Davenport v Little and Bowser 611 S.E.2d.
  48. Finstuen v. Crutcher 496 F.3d 1139, 2007.
  49. Finstuen v. Edmondson, 497 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2006.
  50. RAB v MIB [2008] CSIH 52.
  51. RH v RH SAC (Civ) 31 2017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 184 - 210
Published on: Aug 19, 2021
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2021 Zia Akhtar, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.