References
- BOELES, Pieter et al. European Migration Law. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2009.
- DRAGHICI, Carmen. The Legitimacy of Family Rights in Strasbourg Case Law ‘Living Instrument’ or Extinguishing Sovereignty? Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017.
- KILKELY, Ursula. The Child and the European Convention of Human Rights. Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999.
- KLAASSEN, Mark; RODRIGUES, Peter. The Best Interests of the Child in EU Family Reunification Law: A Plea for More Guidance on the Role of Article 24(2) Charter. European Journal of Migration and Law, 2017, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 191–218.10.1163/15718166-12340007
- KLAVERBOER, Margrite al. The Best interests of the Child in Cases of Migration – Assessing and Determining the Best Interests of the Child in Migration Procedures. The international Journal of Children’s Rights, 2017, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 114–139.10.1163/15718182-02501005
- LELOUP, Mathieu, The principle of the best interests of the child in the expulsion case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Procedural rationality as a remedy for inconsistency. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2019, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 50–68.10.1177/0924051918820986
- LETSAS, George, Strasbourg’s Interpretative Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer. The European Journal of International Law, 2010, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 509–541.10.1093/ejil/chq056
- POBJOY, J. M., The best interests of the child principle as an independent source of protection, International Comparative Law Quarterly, 2015, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 327–363.10.1017/S0020589315000044
- SANDBERG, Kirsten, Children’s Right to Protection under the CRC. In FALCH-ERIK-SEN, Asgeir, BACKE-HANSEN, Elisabeth (ed) Human Rights in Child Protection, Implication for professional Practice and Policy. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 15–38.10.1007/978-3-319-94800-3_2
- SKIVENES Marit, SØRSDAL Line Marie, The Child’s Best Interest Principle across Child Protection Jurisdictions. In FALCH-ERIKSEN, Asgeir, BACKE-HANSEN, Elisabeth (ed) Human Rights in Child Protection, Implication for professional Practice and Policy. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 59–88.10.1007/978-3-319-94800-3_4
- SMYTH, Ciara. The Best Interests of the Child in the Expulsion and First-entry Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: How Principled is the Court’s Use of the Principle? European Journal of Migration and Law, 2015, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 70–103.10.1163/15718166-12342072
- STRØMLAND, Monika et al. In Your Best Interest – A Discussion of How Capability Approach Could be Used as a Guideline to Strengthen and Supplement the Principle of the Child’s Best Interests. The international Journal of Children’s Rights, 2019, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 517–544.10.1163/15718182-02703009
- VAN BUREN, Geraldine. Child Rights in Europe: Convergence and Divergence in Judicial Protection, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2007.
- WANDENHOLE, Wouter; RYNGAERT, Julie. Mainstreaming children’s rights in migration litigation: Muskhadzhiyeva and others v. Belgium. In BREMS, Eva (ed.). Diversity and European Human Rights: Rewriting Judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–92.10.1017/CBO9781139208130.007
- Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 12, The right of the child to be heard, UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/12, 20 July 2009.
- Committee on the Rights of the Child, ‘General Comment No. 14, The Right of the Child to Have his or her Best Interests Taken as a Primary Consideration, UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/14, 29 May 2013.
- Handyside v The United Kingdom, Application No. 5493/72, Judgement of the 7 December 1976.
- Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v the UK, Application No. 9214/80; 9473/81; 9474/81, Judgement of 28 May 1985.
- Keegan v Ireland, 18 EHRR 342, 1994.10.1515/labm.1994.18.7-8.342
- Sorabjee v UK, App. No 23938/94, ECmHR, Decision of 23 October 1995.
- Gül v Switzerland, Appl. No. 23218/94, ECtHR judgement of 29 February 1996.
- Ahmut v Netherlands (1996) 24 EHRR 62.
- Boultif v Switzerland App. No. 54273/00 (ECtHR, 2 August 2001) para 48.
- Yildiz v Austria App no 37295/97 (ECtHR, 31 October 2002).10.2307/779086
- Sen v the Netherlands, 21 December 2001 (2003) 36 EHRR 7.
- Jakupovic v Austria App no 36757/97 (ECtHR, 6 February 2003) paras 28–33.
- IM v The Netherlands Application No. 41226/98, ECHR, 25 March 2003.
- Chandra and Others v The Netherlands, App. No. 53102/99, ECtHR decision of 13 May 2003.
- Ramos Andrade v The Netherlands, App. No. 53675/00, ECtHR decision of 6 July 2004.
- Amara v NL, Appl. No 6914/02, Decision of October 2004.
- Tuquabo-Tekle v The Netherlands, App.No. 60665/00, ECtHR judgement of 1 December 2005.
- Rodriges da Silva and Hoogkamer v the Netherlands, app. No. 50435/99, ECtHR 31 January 2006.
- Üner v Netherlands App. No. 46410/99 (ECtHR (GC), 18 October 2006).
- Emre v Switzerland App no 42034/04 (ECtHR, 22 May 2008).
- Maslov v Austria, Application No. 1638/03 ECtHR judgement of 13 June 2008, (GC).
- Demir and Baykara v Turkey, Application No.34503/97, judgment of 12 November 2008.
- Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland, Application No. 41615/07, Judgment (GC) of 6 July 2010, para 135.
- Nunes v Norway Appl. No., 55597/09, ECtHR 28 June 2011.
- Antwi and Others v N, Appl. No 26940/10, Judgement of 14 February 2012.
- Omoregi v N, Appl. No 265/07, Judgement of 15 November 2012.
- Berisha v Switzerland Application No. 948/12, ECtHR Judgement of 30 July 2013.
- Josef v Belgium, Application No. 70055/10, Decision of 27 February 2014.
- Palanci v Switzerland, Application No. 2607/08, Judgement of 25 March 2014.
- Papashvillo v Belgium, Appl. No. 41738/10, Judgement of 17 April 2014.
- Kaplan v Norway, Appl. No. 32504/10, Judgement of 24 July 2014.
- Jeunesse v Netherlands, App No 12738/10, Grand Chamber, ECHR, 3 October 2014.