Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Autonomy or Sovereignty: the Case of the European Union

Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. Avis sur la participation des observateurs du Conseil de l’Europe à l’Assemblée commune et sur la conclusion d’un accord à cet effet, Strasbourg, 16 December 1952.
  2. BARNARD, Catherine. A proportionate response to proportionality in the field of collective action. E.L. Rev., 2012, vol. 37, no. 2.
  3. BARENTS, René. The Autonomy of Community Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.
  4. BARTELSON, Jens. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.10.4324/9781315774909
  5. BIEBER, Roland. An Association of Sovereign States. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609003915
  6. BOGDANOWICZ, Piotr. Jak Trybunał Sprawiedliwości „aktywował” art. 19 ust. 1 TUE w kontekście praworządności: uwagi na tle sprawy C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses. In BARCZ, Jan, ZAWIDZKA-ŁOJEK, Anna (red). Sądowe mechanizmy ochrony praworządności w Polsce w świetle najnowszego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE. Warszawa: Elipsa, 2018.
  7. BRAUER, Jurgen, HAYWOOD, Robert. Non-state Sovereign Entrepreneurs and Non-territorial Sovereign Organizations. UNU-WIDER Working Paper, 2010, no. 9.10.1057/9780230295155_14
  8. CONTARTESE, Cristina. The autonomy of the EU legal order in the ECJ’s external relations case law: From the “essential” to the “specific characteristics” of the Union and back again. CMLR, 2017, vol. 54, no. 6.10.54648/COLA2017145
  9. DE BÚRCA, Gráinne. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 2010, vol. 51, no. 1.
  10. DYEVRE, Arthur. European Integration and National Courts: Defending Sovereignty under Institutional Constraints? European Constitutional Law Review, 2013, vol. 9, no. 1.10.1017/S157401961200106X
  11. GEENENS, Raf. Sovereignty as Autonomy. Law and Philosophy, 2017, vol. 36, no. 5.10.1007/s10982-017-9295-3
  12. GRILLI, Antonio. Aux origines du droit de l’Union Européenne: Ie “ius commune” national dans les conclusions des avocats généraux: Karl Roemer et Maurice Lagrange (1954–1964). Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 2008, vol. 76, no. 1–2.10.1163/157181908X277608
  13. GRIMM, Dieter. Defending Sovereign Statehood Against Transforming the Union Into a State. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609003538
  14. GRIMM, Dieter. Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.10.7312/grim16424
  15. HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej. Lessons from the “Constitutional Mythology” or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2015, vol. 6, no. 2.10.1515/danb-2015-0005
  16. JAKAB, András. Neutralizing the Sovereignty. Question Compromise Strategies in Constitutional Argumentation. European Constitutional Law Review, 2006, vol. 2, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019606003750
  17. JESSURUN D’OLIVEIRA, Hans Ulrich. The EU and Its Monarchies: Influences and Frictions. European Constitutional Law Review, 2012, vol. 8, no. 1.10.1017/S1574019612000041
  18. Judgment of the Court of 21 December 1954, French Republic v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, 1–54, ECLI:EU:C:1954:7.
  19. Judgment of the Court of 29 November 1956, Fédération Charbonnière de Belgique v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, 8–55, ECLI:EU:C:1956:11.
  20. Judgment of the Court of 5 February 1963, NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, 26–62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1.
  21. Judgment of the Court of 17 December 1970, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, 11–70, ECLI:EU:C:1970:114.
  22. Judgment of the Court of 31 March 1971, Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities, 22–70, ECLI:EU:C:1971:32.
  23. Judgment of the Court of 9 July 1987, Federal Republic of Germany and others v Commission of the European Communities, 281, 283, 284, 285 and 287/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:351.
  24. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 September 2005, Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, T-315/01, ECLI:EU:T:2005:332.
  25. Judgment of the Court of 3 September 2008, Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:461.
  26. Judgment of the Court, 18 July 2013, European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi, C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P., ECLI:EU:C:2013:518.
  27. Judgment of the Court of 27 February 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas, case C-64/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117.
  28. KLABBERS, Jan. An introduction to international institutional law. Second Edition. Cambridge: CUP, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511801013
  29. KRANZ, Jerzy. Pojęcie suwerenności we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym. Warszawa: Elipsa, 2015.
  30. KRASNER, Stephen D. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.10.1515/9781400823260
  31. KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s Idea of State Sovereignty – Is It Still Alive? International Community Law Review, 2011, vol. 13, no. 1–2.10.1163/187197311X552901
  32. KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Interesy indywidualne państw a interesy wspólnotowe w prawie społeczności międzynarodowej. O znaczeniu liberalizmu i komunitaryzmu dla teorii prawa międzynarodowego. Lublin: UMCS, 2015.
  33. KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Państwo i jego suwerenność a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa. In KWIECIEŃ, Roman (ed). Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa. Lublin: UMCS, 2015.
  34. LENAERTS, Koen. The Kadi Saga and the Rule of Law within the EU. SMU Law Review, 2014, vol. 67, no. 4.
  35. LOCK, Tobias. Why the European Union is not a State: Some Critical Remarks. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609004076
  36. LOHSE, Eva J. Fundamental Freedoms and Private Actors – towards an ‘Indirect Horizontal Effect’. European Public Law, 2007, vol. 13, no 1.10.54648/EURO2007008
  37. Opinion of the Court of 16 May 2017, Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore, 2/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:376.
  38. PERNICE, Ingolf. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019615000279
  39. PŘIBÁŇ Jiří. Sovereignty in Post-Sovereign Society. A Systems Theory of European Constitutionalism. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.10.4324/9781315610085
  40. TANZI, Attila. Remarks on Sovereignty in the Evolving Constitutional Features of the International Community. International Community Law Review, 2010, vol. 12, no. 2.10.1163/187197310X498570
  41. VAN DER WALT, Johan. The horizontal effect revolution and the question of sovereignty. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.10.1515/9783110248036
  42. VAN ELSUWEGE, Peter, GREMMELPREZ, Femke. Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice. European Constitutional Law Review, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1.10.1017/S1574019620000085
  43. VAN ROSSEM, Jan, W. The Autonomy of EU Law: More is Less? In WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven (eds). Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013.10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0_2
  44. WEINERT, Matthew S. Democratic Sovereignty. Authority, legitimacy, and state in a globalizing age. New York: UCL Press, 2007.10.4324/9780203965689
  45. WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven. Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations – An Introduction. In WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven (eds). Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013.10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0
  46. WIND, Marlene. Sovereignty and European Integration. Towards a Post-Hobbesian Order. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
  47. ZETTERQUIST, Ola. Out with the New, in with the Old – Neo-Roman Constitutional Thought and the Enigma of Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. In AVBELJ, Matej, KOMÁREK, Jan (eds). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 92
Published on: Feb 21, 2021
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2021 Danuta Kabat-Rudnicka, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.