Avis sur la participation des observateurs du Conseil de l’Europe à l’Assemblée commune et sur la conclusion d’un accord à cet effet, Strasbourg, 16 December 1952.
BOGDANOWICZ, Piotr. Jak Trybunał Sprawiedliwości „aktywował” art. 19 ust. 1 TUE w kontekście praworządności: uwagi na tle sprawy C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses. In BARCZ, Jan, ZAWIDZKA-ŁOJEK, Anna (red). Sądowe mechanizmy ochrony praworządności w Polsce w świetle najnowszego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE. Warszawa: Elipsa, 2018.
BRAUER, Jurgen, HAYWOOD, Robert. Non-state Sovereign Entrepreneurs and Non-territorial Sovereign Organizations. UNU-WIDER Working Paper, 2010, no. 9.10.1057/9780230295155_14
CONTARTESE, Cristina. The autonomy of the EU legal order in the ECJ’s external relations case law: From the “essential” to the “specific characteristics” of the Union and back again. CMLR, 2017, vol. 54, no. 6.10.54648/COLA2017145
DE BÚRCA, Gráinne. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 2010, vol. 51, no. 1.
DYEVRE, Arthur. European Integration and National Courts: Defending Sovereignty under Institutional Constraints? European Constitutional Law Review, 2013, vol. 9, no. 1.10.1017/S157401961200106X
GRILLI, Antonio. Aux origines du droit de l’Union Européenne: Ie “ius commune” national dans les conclusions des avocats généraux: Karl Roemer et Maurice Lagrange (1954–1964). Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 2008, vol. 76, no. 1–2.10.1163/157181908X277608
GRIMM, Dieter. Defending Sovereign Statehood Against Transforming the Union Into a State. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609003538
HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej. Lessons from the “Constitutional Mythology” or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2015, vol. 6, no. 2.10.1515/danb-2015-0005
JAKAB, András. Neutralizing the Sovereignty. Question Compromise Strategies in Constitutional Argumentation. European Constitutional Law Review, 2006, vol. 2, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019606003750
JESSURUN D’OLIVEIRA, Hans Ulrich. The EU and Its Monarchies: Influences and Frictions. European Constitutional Law Review, 2012, vol. 8, no. 1.10.1017/S1574019612000041
Judgment of the Court of 29 November 1956, Fédération Charbonnière de Belgique v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, 8–55, ECLI:EU:C:1956:11.
Judgment of the Court of 5 February 1963, NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, 26–62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1.
Judgment of the Court of 17 December 1970, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, 11–70, ECLI:EU:C:1970:114.
Judgment of the Court of 9 July 1987, Federal Republic of Germany and others v Commission of the European Communities, 281, 283, 284, 285 and 287/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:351.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 September 2005, Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, T-315/01, ECLI:EU:T:2005:332.
Judgment of the Court of 3 September 2008, Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:461.
Judgment of the Court, 18 July 2013, European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi, C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P., ECLI:EU:C:2013:518.
KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s Idea of State Sovereignty – Is It Still Alive? International Community Law Review, 2011, vol. 13, no. 1–2.10.1163/187197311X552901
KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Interesy indywidualne państw a interesy wspólnotowe w prawie społeczności międzynarodowej. O znaczeniu liberalizmu i komunitaryzmu dla teorii prawa międzynarodowego. Lublin: UMCS, 2015.
KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Państwo i jego suwerenność a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa. In KWIECIEŃ, Roman (ed). Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa. Lublin: UMCS, 2015.
LOCK, Tobias. Why the European Union is not a State: Some Critical Remarks. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609004076
LOHSE, Eva J. Fundamental Freedoms and Private Actors – towards an ‘Indirect Horizontal Effect’. European Public Law, 2007, vol. 13, no 1.10.54648/EURO2007008
PERNICE, Ingolf. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019615000279
PŘIBÁŇ Jiří. Sovereignty in Post-Sovereign Society. A Systems Theory of European Constitutionalism. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.10.4324/9781315610085
TANZI, Attila. Remarks on Sovereignty in the Evolving Constitutional Features of the International Community. International Community Law Review, 2010, vol. 12, no. 2.10.1163/187197310X498570
VAN ELSUWEGE, Peter, GREMMELPREZ, Femke. Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice. European Constitutional Law Review, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1.10.1017/S1574019620000085
VAN ROSSEM, Jan, W. The Autonomy of EU Law: More is Less? In WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven (eds). Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013.10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0_2
WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven. Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations – An Introduction. In WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven (eds). Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013.10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0
ZETTERQUIST, Ola. Out with the New, in with the Old – Neo-Roman Constitutional Thought and the Enigma of Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. In AVBELJ, Matej, KOMÁREK, Jan (eds). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.