References
- BERGQVIST, Trine Osen. The winner does not take it all. Swedish Court of Appeal says co-operation between competing bidders is not restrictive by object. European Competition Law Review, 2019, no 4, p. 141
- ESTACHE, Antonio, IIMI, Atsushi. Procurement Efficiency for Infrastructure Development and Financial Needs Reassessed. [online]. Available at:
- HERRERA ANCHUSTEGUI, Ignacio. Joint Bidding and Object Restrictions of Competition: The EFTA Court’s Take in the Taxi Case. European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, 2017, no 2, p. 17810.21552/core/2017/2/14
- GIANNINO. Michele. The Regional Administrative Court of Lazio confirms that bid-rigging is a competition restriction by object (Eco Trass). [online]. Available at:
- KJAER-HANSEN, Erik., ALSING, Josephine. Danish Court: Consortium Agreement and Joint Bidding Permissible under Competition Law. Journal of Competition Law & Practice, 2019, no 4, p. 24110.1093/jeclap/lpz004
- MACMAHON BALDWIN, Sam. Danish Court Quashes Landmark Joint Bidding Decision – Legal and Economic Context Saves the Day. [online]. Available at:
- MERLINO, Pietro. Italy Team Convinces Italian Authority to Close Investigation. [online]. Available at:
- RICHARDS, Matt. Italy drops pharma bidding probe [online]. Available at:
- RICHARDS, Matt. Temporary unions are not a per se cartel, Spanish court rules. [online]. Available at:
- RITTER, Cyril. Joint Tendering Under EU Competition Law [online]. Available at:
- SÁNCHEZ GRAELLS, Albert. Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules. Second Edition. Oxford: Bloomsbury, 2015, 624 p.
- THOMAS, Christopher. Two Bids or not to Bid? An Exploration of the Legality of Joint Bidding and Subcontracting Under EU Competition Law. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2015, no 9, p. 63410.1093/jeclap/lpv016
- VOLPIN, Cristina. The ball is in your court: Evidential burden of proof and the proof-proximity principle in EU competition law. Common Market Law Review, 2014, no 4, p. 115910.54648/COLA2014089