References
- Appellant’s Opening Brief (1 February 2019) [online]. Available at:
- Application for a Stay of Proceedings by the United States Department of Justice (18 October 2018) [online]. Available at:
- Ashgar Leghari v Federation of Pakistan, WP No 25501/2015, Lahore High Court Green Bench, Orders of 4 and 14 September 2015.
- Associated Press. US temporarily stops youth climate lawsuit days before trial in Oregon [online]. Available at:
- California v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. C06-05755, 2007 WL 2726871, N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2007.
- Climate Change and Future Generations Lawsuit in Colombia: Key Excerpts from the Supreme Court’s Decision [online]. Available at:
- Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, No. 1:05-CV-436, 2007 WL 6942285, S.D. Miss. Aug. 30, 2007.
- Connecticut v. Am. Elec. Power Co., 406 F. Supp. 2d 265, S.D.N.Y. 2005.
- DOORI, Song. Judicial approaches to political questions: A comparative study of the United States and South Korea. International and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 234–260. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0008.10.2478/iclr-2019-0008
- GALLUCCI, Maria. Trump Administration Takes a ‘Drastic’ Step to Stop Youth Climate Lawsuit. [online]. Available at:
- Greenpeace Nordic Ass’n and Nature and Youth v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, Case no. 16166674TVI-OTIR/06, Oslo District Court, 4 January 2018.
- HARTMAN, Steven. Juliana v United States: The unresolved case already making a difference. [online] Available at:
- IRFAN, Umair. The Supreme Court Stepped in to Stall a Climate Lawsuit. That’s Really Weird. [online]. Available at:
- Juliana et al v United States of America et al, US District Court, District of Oregon, First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; Case No.: 6:15-cv-01517-TC, 9 October 2015.
- Juliana v United States of America 217 F Supp 3d, D Or 2016.
- Juliana v United States of America 339 F Supp 3d, D Or 2018
- Juliana v United States of America Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 182, 28 June 2017.
- Kelsey Rose Juliana vs USA United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Portland Oregon case no 18-36082, 4 June 2019.
- Kelsey Rose Juliana vs USA United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Portland Oregon case no 18-36082 Opinion, 17 January 2020.
- KORMANN, Carolyn. The Right to a Stable Climate is the Constitutional Question of the Twenty-First Century. [online]. Available at: < https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-right-to-a-stable-climate-is-the-constitutional-question-of-the-twenty-first-century> Accessed: 23 January 2020.
- Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, US Case Law, vol. 504, 1992.
- Massachusetts v Environmental Protection Agency, 22 Ill.549 U.S. 497, 127 S. Ct. 1438, 167 L. Ed. 2d 248, 63 ERC 2057, 2007.
- Native Vill. of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 663 F. Supp. 2d 863, N.D. Cal. 2009.
- Obergefell v Hodges 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2015.
- Opinion of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (7 March 2018). [online]. Available at:
- Opinion of the United States Supreme Court (30 July 2018). [online]. Available at:
- Order of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (26 December 2018) [online]. Available at:
- Order of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (8 November 2018) [online]. Available at:
- Order of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon (21 November 2018) [online]. Available at: < https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5219185-Juliana-v-US-Interlocutory-Appeal-Order-112118.html> Accessed: 24 January 2020.
- Order of the United States Supreme Court (2 November 2018) [online]. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110218zr2_8ok0.pdf> Accessed: 24 January 2020.
- O‘ROURKE, Ciara. The 11-Year Old Suing Trump Over Climate Change. The Atlantic. [online]. Available at:
- POWERS, Melissa. Juliana v United States: The next frontier in US climate mitigation? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 2018, vol.27, no. 2, pp. 199–204.10.1111/reel.12248
- Rabab Ali v Federation of Pakistan & Another, 2016.04.04, Supreme Court of Pakistan.10.4172/2315-7844.1000198
- Stichting Urgenda v Government of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment), ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7145, Rechtbank Den Haag, C/09/456689/HA ZA
- Summary and translation of STC4360-2018 de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil, M.P. Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona (2018) by Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide. [online]. Available at:
- United States of America et al v United States District Court for the District of Oregon and Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana et al (Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon and Request for Stay of Proceedings in District Court) Case No 6:15-cv-01517-TC-AA, D. Or., 9 June 2017, p. 12.
- WEAVER, R. Henry, KYSAR, Douglas. A. Courting Disaster: Climate Change and the Adjudication of Disaster. Notre Dame Law Review, 2017, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 295–356.10.2139/ssrn.2965084