Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Circumventing Obligations Through Multinational Military Operations: Legal Consequences for Troop Contributing States Cover

Circumventing Obligations Through Multinational Military Operations: Legal Consequences for Troop Contributing States

By: Tuomas Heikkinen and  Martin Faix  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. ABRAHAM, Elizabeth. Comment: The Sins of the Savior: Hold the United Nations Accountable to International Human Rights Standards for Executive Order Detentions in its Mission in Kosovo. American University Law Review, 2003, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1291–1337
  2. BARON, Wiebe. Command Responsibility in a Multinational Setting: How to Deal with Different Interpretations of International (Humanitarian) Law. Some Experiences from Practice. Military Law and Law of War Review, 2005, vol. 44, p. 14210.4337/mllwr.2005.3-4.15
  3. BLOKKER, Niels. Member State Responsibility for Wrongdoings of International Organizations – Beacon of Hope or Delusion? International Organizations Law Review, 2015, vol. 12, pp. 319–33210.1163/15723747-01202003
  4. CASEY-MASLEN, Stuart. Commentaries on Arms Control Treaties Volume I: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and their Destruction. 2nd Edition, 2005, Oxford University Press.10.1093/law/9780199287024.001.0001
  5. NATO. Consensus Decision-Making at NATO [online]. 14 March 2016, available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_49178.htm (last accessed on 24 July 2019)
  6. D’ASPREMONT, Jean. Abuse of the Legal Personality of International Organizations and the Responsibility of Member States. International Organizations Law Review, 2007, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 91–119.10.1163/157237307X223648
  7. D’ASPREMONT, Jean. The limits to the exclusive responsibility of International Organizations. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 2007, pp. 215–228
  8. DÖRMANN, Knut et al. Commentary on the First Geneva Convention. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 201610.1017/9781316755709
  9. ECOWAS Community Standing Mediation Committee. Decision A/Dec.1/8/90 On the Ceasefire and Establishment of an ECOWAS Ceasefire Monitoring Group for Liberia. Official Journal of the Economic Community of West African States, vol. 21, November 1991, pp. 6–8, available at: https://www.peaceagreements.org/masterdocument/1305 (last accessed on 24 July 2019)
  10. ECtHR, Bosphorus v Ireland, Application No 45036/98 (2006) 42 EHRR 1
  11. ECtHR, Decision as to the Admissibility of 2 May 2007, Application No 71412/01 (Agim Behrami and Bekir Behrami against France) and Application No 78166/01 (Ruzhdi Saramati against France, Germany and Norway)
  12. ECtHR, Gasparini v. Italy and Belgium, Application No. 10750/03, Admissibility Decision of 12 May 2009.
  13. ECtHR, Kokkelvisserij v the Netherlands, Application No 13645/05, Judgment of 20 January 2009
  14. EGNELL, Robert. The Swedish Experience: Overcoming the Non-NATO-Member Conundrum. In MUELLER, Karl P. (ed.) Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War. 2015, Rand Corporation, pp. 466 (p. 320), available online at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR600/RR676/RAND_RR676.pdf (last accessed on 24 July 2019)
  15. FRANCIS, David. ECOMOG: A New Security Agenda in World Politics. In BAKUT, Bakut Tswah, DUTT, Sagarika (eds.) Africa at the Millennium: An Agenda for Mature Development. Palgrave, 2000, pp. 177–20210.1007/978-1-137-05113-4_10
  16. Hague District Court, Mothers of Srebrenica vs The Netherlands, C/09/295247 / HA ZA 07-2973
  17. International Law Commission. Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations and the accompanying Commentaries, 2011 ILC 63rd session, UN Doc. A/RES/66/10
  18. MÖLDNER, Mirka. Responsibility of International Organizations – Introducing the ILC’s DARIO. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 2012, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 282–327, available online at: https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf4/mpunyb_06_Moeldner_161.pdf (last accessed 24 July 2019)
  19. MURRAY, Odette. Piercing the Corporate Veil: The Responsibility of Member states of an International Organisation. International Organizations Law Review, 2011, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 291–34710.1163/157237411X633881
  20. NATO. International Military Staff [online]. 15 June 2017, available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_64557.htm (last accessed on 24 July 2019)
  21. NATO. North Atlantic Council [online]. 10 October 2017, available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_49763.htm (last accessed 24 May 2019)
  22. NYSTUEN, Gro, CASEY-MASLEN, Stuart. The Convention on Cluster Munitions: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2010.10.1093/law/9780199599004.001.0001
  23. PAASIVIRTA, Esa. Responsibility of a Member State of an International Organization: Where Will it End? Comments on Article 60 of the ILC Draft on the Responsibility of International Organizations. International Organizations Law Review, 2010, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–6110.1163/157237310X523830
  24. REINISCH, August. Securing the Accountability of International Organizations. Global Governance, 2001, vol. 7, pp. 131–14910.1163/19426720-00702004
  25. RYNGAERT, Cedric. The Responsibility of Member States of International Organizations – Concluding Observations. International Organizations Law Review, 2015, vol. 12, pp. 502–51710.1163/15723747-01202012
  26. RYNGAERT, Cedric. The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection with Acts of International Organizations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2011, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 997–101710.1017/S0020589311000467
  27. SADURSKA, Romana, CHINKIN, C.M. The Collapse of International Tin Council: A Case for Responsibility? Virginia Journal of International Law, 1990, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 845–890
  28. SCHERMERS, Henry G, BLOKKER, Niels M. International Institutional Law. 2011, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 5th edition.10.1163/ej.9789004187962.i-1273
  29. ŠTURMA, Pavel. Drawing a Line Between the Responsibility of an International Organization and Its Member States under International Law. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 3–20
  30. TONDINI, Matteo. Coalitions of the Willing. In NOLLKAEMPER, Andre, PLAKOKEFALOS, Ilias (eds.) The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 701–73210.1017/9781316227480.028
  31. UNGA. Fourth Report on Responsibility of International Organizations by Giorgio Gaja, Special Rapporteur. 20 April 2006, A/CN.4/564/Add.2
  32. WALRAVEN, Klaas van. Containing Conflict in the Economic Community of West African States: Lessons from the Intervention in Libya 1990–1997. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, January 1999, available online at: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/19990100_cru_paper_walraven.pdf (last accessed on 25 July 2019)
  33. YEE, Sienho. ‘Member Responsibility’ and the ILC Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: Some Observations. In RAGAZZI, Maurizio (ed.) Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013, pp. 325–336.10.1163/9789004256088_028
  34. ZIMMERMANN, Andreas. The Security Council and the Obligation to Prevent Genocide and War Crimes. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 2012, vol. 32, pp. 307–314, available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2407597 (last accessed on 24 July 2019).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 172 - 189
Published on: Oct 7, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Tuomas Heikkinen, Martin Faix, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.