Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Non-Signatories in International Commercial Arbitration: Contesting the Myth of Consent

International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 18 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Feb 2019

References

  1. Ad hoc award. Decided in 1991. ASA Bulletin, vol. 10, 1992, pp. 202-258. [online]. Avail­able at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 31.5.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Badia, A. Piercing the veil of state enterprises in international arbitration. The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2014. 280 pages. ISBN 9041151621.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Blackaby, N. ; Partasides, C.; Redfern, A., et al. Redfern and Hunter on international arbitra­tion. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 849 pages. ISBN 0199557195.10.1093/law:iic/9780199557189.001.1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Blumberg, P. The Multinational Challenge to Corporate Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 337 pages. ISBN 9780195361346.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Blumberg, P. ; Strasser, K.; Gouvin, E., et al. Blumberg on Corporate Groups. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2004. ISBN 9780735542068.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Born, G. International commercial arbitration (2014). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014. 4260 pages. ISBN 9789041152190.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bowden, P. L‘interdiction des se contredire au détriment d‘autrui (estoppel) as a Substan­tive Transnational Rule in International Commercial Arbitration. In Bernardini, p. ; Gaillard, E. Transnational rules in international commercial arbitration. Paris, France: ICC Publications, 1993. 274 pages. ISBN 9789284201549.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Brekoulakis, S. Rethinking Consent in International Commercial Arbitration: A General Theory for Non-signatories. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2017, no. 8, pp. 610-643.10.1093/jnlids/idx012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Bundesgericht. Decided on 19.4.1994. Sammlung der Bundesgerichtsentscheide, vol. 120, 1994, pp. 155-172. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 29.7.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Bundesgericht. Decided on 29.1.1996. ASA Bulletin, vol. 14, 1996, pp. 496-507. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 2.6.2014.10.1017/S0002021400015644
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Bundesgericht. Decided on 16. 10. 2003. Case number 4P 115/2003. Sammlung der Bun­desgerichtsentscheide, vol. 129, 2003, pp. 727-738. [online]. Available at: http://www.bger.ch. Accessed 2.1.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Bundesgericht. Decided on 22.1.2008. Case number 4A_244/2007. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 8.5.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Bundesgericht. Decided on 25.8.2009. Case number 4A_160/2009. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 1.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Bundesgericht. Decided on 7.4.2014. Case number 4A_450/2013. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 1.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Bundesgericht. Decided on 16.2.2017. Case number 4A_473/2016. [online]. Avail­able at: http://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bger/170216_4A_473-2016.html. Accessed 20.11.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Bundesgerichtshof. Decided on 17.4.2008. Case number III ZB 97/06. [online]. Available at: www.jurion.de. Accessed 1.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Bundesgerichtshof. Decided on 8.5.2014. Case number III ZR 371/12. [online]. Available at: https://beck-online.beck.de/Dokument?vpath=bibdata%5Czeits%5Cschiedsvz%5C2014%5Ccont%5Cschiedsvz.2014.151.1.htm. Accessed 20.11.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Busse, D. Die Bindung Dritter an Schiedsvereinbarungen. SchiedsVZ - Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren, 2005, no. 3, pp. 118-123.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Cour d´Appel de Paris. Decided on 30.11.1988. Revue de l‘arbitrage, 1989, p. 691. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 17.3.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Cour d´Appel de Paris. Decided on 14.2.1989. La Revue de l‘arbitrage, 1989, p. 691. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 17.3.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Cour d‘Appel de Pau. Decided on 26.11.1986. Case number N/A. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, vol. XIII, 1988, pp. 149-151. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitra­tion.com. Accessed 31.12.2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Cour de Cassation. Decided on 6.7.2005. Case number 01-15912. [online]. Available at: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURITEXT000007050505. Accessed 1.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Cour de Cassation. Decided on 27.3.2007. Revue de l‘arbitrage, 2007, pp. 758-787. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 30.5.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division). Decided on 21.11.2008. Case number B2/2008/0489. [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1283.html. Accessed 7.6.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division). Decided on 20.6.2012. Case num­ber A3/2011/3093, 3270 and 3306. [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/808.html. Accessed 1.7.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Derains, Y. Is there a Group of Companies Doctrine? In Hanotiau, B.; Schwartz, E. A. Multiparty arbitration. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, 2010. 272 pages. ISBN 9284200830.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Fouchard, P. ; Gaillard, E.; Goldman, B., et al. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on internation­al commercial arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999. 1280 pages. ISBN 9789041110251.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Gaillard, E. L‘Interdiction de se Contredire au Détriment d‘Autrui comme Principe Géné­ral du Droit du Commerce International. Revue de l‘arbitrage, 1985, pp. 241-258.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Gross, D. Zur Inanspruchnahme Dritter vor Schiedsgerichten in Fällen der Durchgriff­shaftung. SchiedsVZ - Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren, 2006, no. 4, pp. 194-196.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Halla, S.; Drličková, K. Zmeny v subjektoch hlavnej zmluvy a ich dopad na súvisiacu rozhodcovskú zmluvu. Obchodněprávní revue, 2014, no. 3, pp. 76-82.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Hanotiau, B. Complex arbitrations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005. xv, 392. ISBN 904112442X.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Hanotiau, B. Non-signatories in International Arbitration: Lessons from Thirty Years of Case Law. In van den Berg, A. J. International Arbitration 2006. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 957 pages. ISBN 9789041126917.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. ICC International Court of Arbitration. Decided on 23.9.1982. Case number ICC No. 4131. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, vol. IX, 1984, pp. 131-137. [online]. Avail­able at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 17.5.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. ICC International Court of Arbitration. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, vol. 2, 1991. [online]. Available at: www.iccdrl.com. Accessed 30.5.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Landrove, J. C. Assignment and Arbitration. Basel: Schulthess, 2009. 218 pages. ISBN 978-3-7255-5782-0.Lew, J. D. M; Mistelis, L.; Kröll, S. Comparative international commercial arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003. 953 pages. ISBN 9789041115683.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Mantilla-Serrano, F. Multiple Parties and Multiple Contracts: Divergent or Comparable Issues? In Hanotiau, B.; Schwartz, E. A. Multiparty arbitration. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, 2010. 272 pages. ISBN 9284200830.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Mayer, P. Extension of the arbitration clause to non-signatories under French law. In Perma­nent Court of Arbitration. Multiple party actions in international arbitration. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 445 pages. ISBN 978-0-19-955172-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Poudret, J.-F.; Besson, S.; Berti, S., et al. Comparative law of international arbitration. Lon­don: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007. 952 pages. ISBN 3725553785.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Rau, A.S. Arbitral jurisdiction and the dimension of „consent“. Arbitration International, 2008, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 199-264.10.1093/arbitration/24.2.199
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Rubino-Sammartano, M. International arbitration law. The Hague: Kluwer Law Interna­tional, 2001. 1080 pages. ISBN 9789041114259.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. The High Court of Justice (Chancery Division). Decided on 4.10.1977. Yearbook Com­mercial Arbitration, vol. IV., 1979, pp. 317-319. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerar­bitration.com. Accessed 7.6.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. The High Court of Justice (Queen‘s Bench). Decided on 4.2.2004. Case number [2004] EWHC 121 (Comm). [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2004/121.html. Accessed 2.1.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Decided on 6.2.2013. Case number [2013] UKSC 5. [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/5.html. Accessed 1.7.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Trittman, R.; Hanefeld, I. Commentary on the German Arbitration Law (10th Book of the German Code of Civil Procedure). In Böckstiegel, K.; Kröll, S.; Nacimiento, P. Arbitra­tion in Germany. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 1223 pages. ISBN 9041127186.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Trittman, R.; Hanefeld, I. Part II - Commentary on the German Arbitration Law (10th Book of the German Code of Civil Procedure). In Böckstiegel, K.; Kröll, S.; Nacimien­to, P. Arbitration in Germany. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 1223 pages. ISBN 9041127186.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. U.S. Supreme Court. Decided on 6.3.1944. Supreme Court Reporter, vol. 321, 1944, 349 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 29.6.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. U.S. Supreme Court. Decided on 20.6.1960. Supreme Court Reporter, vol. 363, 1960, 564 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.7.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Decided on 6.9.1984. Case number 83-7034. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 741, 342 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Decided on 30.12.1993. Case number 91-9153. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 10, 753 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Decided on 13.12.1988. Case number 87-1759 a 88-1501. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 863, 315 a násl. [online]. Avail­able at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 1. 8. 1960. Case number 25914. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 282, 231 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.5.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 22.11.1993. Case number 93-7271. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 9, 1060 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 24.8.1995. Case number 94-9118. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 64, 773 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.1.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 17.3.1999. Case number 98-7823(L), 98-7893(XAP). Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 170, 349 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 14.4.2005. Case number 02-9383. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 404, 657 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 7.6.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 21.10.2008. Case number 01-7899. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 217, 403 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Decided on 28.9.1981. Case number 80-2817. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 659, 836 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. United States District Court S. D. New York. Decided on 20.9.1966. Case number no. 66 Civ. 2072. Federal Supplement, vol. 259, 688 et seq. [online]. Available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/259/688/2293417/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. United States District Court, S.D. New York. Decided on 11.8.2011. Case number 11 Civ. 00325 (RJH). Federal Supplement, 2nd Series, vol. 803, 270 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Vanderkerckhove, K. Piercing the corporate veil. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 765 pages. ISBN 9041125914.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. White&Case; Queen Mary University of London. 2018 International Arbitration Survey. [online]. Available at: https://www.whitecase.com/publications/insight/2018-interna­tional-arbitration-survey-evolution-international-arbitration. Accessed 28.10.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Zöller, R.; Geimer, R. Zivilprozessordnung. Köln: O. Schmidt, 2007. 3083 pages. ISBN 3504470151.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0038 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 84
Published on: Feb 5, 2019
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Arbitration Agreement,
Consent,
Estoppel,
Extension,
Group of Compa­nies,
Piercing of the Corporate Veil
Related subjects:
Law,
International law, foreign law, comparative law,
International law, foreign law, comparative law, other,
European law,
European law, other,
Public law,
Constitutional jurisdiction, administrative procedural law

© 2019 Slavomír Halla, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 18 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)Next article