GPS Investigations under Constitution of Japan – Comparison with the U.S Cases
References
- Alderman v. United States and Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992).
- Fourth amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
- Hanzai Sousa no tameno Tsushin bouju ni kansuru Ho [Act on Wiretapping for Criminal Investigation], Law no. 137 of 1999. (Japan).
- HIRAMATSU,Tsuyoshi, KOJIN JOUHUO HOGO [Protection of personal information] Japan: Gyosei, 1999, pp. 47, 108, 195.
- House of Representatives of Japan, Question by Member of House of Representatives Takeshi Shina (7. December, 2017).
- IBUSUKI, Makoto, Kanshi no Jidai to Puraibashi [The age of surveillance and privacy], Sekai, 2017, pp. 46–54.
- IBUSUKI,Makoto, GPS SOUSA TO PURAIBASHI HOGO[GPS Investigation and protection of privacy]. Japan: Gendai Jinbunsha, 2018.
- IBUSUKI, Makoto, Haitecku kiki wo riyou sita tsuibi kanshi gata souse [Monitoring investigation via high technology], MEORIAL OF PROF.SHIGETSUGU SUZUKI, VOL.2. Japan: Seibundo, 2007, pp. 182.
- JBA, GPS Idou Tsuiseki Souchi wo mochiita Ichi Jouhou tansak sousa ni kansuru Ikensho [Protest against GPS device investigation](19. January, 2017).
- KAMIGUCHI,Yutaka, KEIJI SOSHO HO [Criminal procedure Act, 3rd edition]. Japan: Seibundo, 2012, pp. 6.
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
- Keiji Sosho HŌ [Code of Criminal Procedure] Law no. 131 of 1948, Art.172, 197(1), 212, 218, 222, 225 (Japan).
- Keisatsu HŌ [The Police Act], Act No. 162 of 1954 (Japan).
- Koops, Bert-Jaap and Newell, Bryce Clayton and Škorvánek, Ivan, Location Tracking by Police: New Frameworks for Preserving Geolocational Privacy (February 12, 2018). UC Irvine Law Review, Vol. 9, Spring 2019, Forthcoming; Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 2018-8.
- Laurence Tribe, The Constitution in Cyberspace (1999).
- Mainichi Shimbun, Court battles over warrantless GPS tracking of crime suspects show need for new law (3. March, 2016).
- Mainichi Shimbun, Reijo nasi de GPS Sousa[Warrantless GPS search](12. Dec., 2017).
- Mainichi Shimbun, Showa Mainich [Daily lives in Showa era] (8. June, 1954).
- Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
- MIC, Denki Tsushin Jigyou ni okeru Kojin Jouhou hogo ni kansuru gaido rain [Guideline for telecommunication for protection of privacy](March, 2015).
- MORITA, Chihokota, Case review of GPS Supreme Court Decision, TSUKUBA JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICS, 2018, vol. 73, pp. 21, 37.
- NIHON-KOKU KENPŌ [Constitution of Japan] May 3, 1947, Art.31, 33, 35, Chapter 8 (Japan).
- Nikkei Shimbun, GPS Sousa Hanzai 7 Ruikeini-Keisatucho ga 06 nen ni Unnoyo kitei – [The NPS guideline for operation of GPS investigation for 7 types of cases in 2006]. (15. February, 2017).
- Nikkei Shimbun, Keisatucho Zenkoku ni Chusi Tsutatu [NPA orders no use of GPS] (16. March, 2017).
- NPA, Keiji Keisatshu no Rekisi[ History of police ] (2008).
- Osaka ChihŌ Saibansho [Osaka Dist. Ct.] July 10, 2015, Heisei 25(wa) no. 5962, 71(3) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 164 (Japan).
- Osaka KotŌ Saibansho [Osaka High Ct.] March 2, 2016, Heisei 27(u) no. 966, 71(3) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 171 (Japan).
- REPETA, Lawrence, Japan Supreme Court Limits Police GPS Surveillance Citing Constitution Article 35, Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law (17. August, 2017).
- SaikŌ Saibansho [Supreme Court] Dec. 13, 1949, Showa 24 (re) no. 2366, 15 SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 349 (Japan).
- SaikŌ Saibansho [Supreme Court] March 16, 1976, Showa 50 (a) no. 146, 30(2) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 187 (Japan).
- SaikŌ Saibansho [Supreme Court] Sep. 7, 1978, Showa 51 (a) no. 865, 32(6) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 1672 (Japan).
- SaikŌ Saibansho [Supreme Court] Oct. 23, 1980, Showa 54 (a) no. 429, 34(5) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 300 (Japan).
- SaikŌ Saibansho [Supreme Court] Dec. 16, 1999, Heisei 9 (a) no. 636, 34(5) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 1327 (Japan).
- SaikŌ Saibansho [Supreme Court] March 15, 2017, Heisei 28 (a) no. 442, 71(3) SaikŌ Saibansho Keiji Hanreishu [Keishu] 13 (Japan).
- TAKIZAWA, Makoto, GPS wo mochiita higisha no shozai bashono kensaku ni tsuite [Searching location of suspect via GPS], MEMORIAL OF SEVENTY YEARS OLD OF PROF. NIROKU TATEISHI. Japan: Seibundo, 2010, pp. 730.
- Terry vs. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
- TSUJI, Yuichiro, Article 9 and the History of Japan‘s Judiciary: Examining Its Likeness to American and German Courts, TSUKUBA JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICS, 2016, vol. 66, pp. 36–40.
- TSUJI, Yuichiro, Constitutional Law Court in Japan, 2016, vol. 66, TSUKUBA JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICS, pp. 65, 68, 73–75.
- TSUJI, Yuichiro, Forgotten People: A Judicial Apology for Leprosy Patients in Japan, 2018, Or. Rev. Int‘l. L., vol. 19, pp. 223, 238.
- TSUJI, Yuichiro, Medical Privacy Issues in Ageing Japan, Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2017, vol. 18, No. 1, article 6, pp. 2–3, 7–8.
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012).
- Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949).
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 197
Published on: Sep 25, 2018
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2018 Yuichiro Tsuji, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.