ASCHAUER, Christian. Die Besetzung von Schiedsgerichten zwischen Parteiautonomie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit. Austrian Law Journal, 2016, No. 1, pp. 102-108.
CARBONNEAU, Thomas E. The Exercise of Contract Freedom in Making of Arbitration Agreements. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2003, Vol. 36, pp. 1189-1232.
DONAHEY, M. Scott. The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators. Journal of International Arbitration, 1992, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 31-42.10.54648/JOIA1992033
HOFFMANN, Leonard. Changing Perspectives on Civil Litigation. The Modern Law Review, 1993, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 297-306.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02674.x
HOUSE OF LORDS. Judgments - Magill v. Porter Magill v. Weeks [online]. publications. parliament.uk, 13 December 2001 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011213/magill-1.htm>.
HRNČIŘÍKOVÁ, Miluše, VALENTOVÁ, Lucia. Judiciální trendy v mimosoudním řešení přeshraničních sporů. (Judicial Trends in the Out-of-Court Settlements of Cross-border Disputes.) 1st edition. Prague: Leges, 2016. 176 p.
CHATTERJEE, C. The Reality of The Party Autonomy Rule In International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 2003, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 539 - 560.10.54648/JOIA2003046
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION. International Dispute Resolution Procedures (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules): English [online]. icdr.org, 1 July 2016 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://www.icdr.org/icdr/faces/i_search/i_rule/i_rule_detail?doc=ADRSTAGE2025301&_afrLoop=163277989018227&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=1a4w45rk1n_161#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3D1a4w45rk1n_161%26_afrLoop%3D163277989018227%26doc%3DADRSTAGE2025301%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrlstate%3D1a4w45rk1n_221>.
INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Arbitration Rules [online]. iccwbo. org, 1 March 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/>.
MUSTILL, Michael John. Comments and Conclusions. In Conservatory Provisional Measures in international Arbitration, 9. Joint Colloquim. ICC Publication, 1993, p. 118.
ONYEMA, Emilia. Selection of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration. International Arbitration Law Review, 2005, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 45-54.
The 1996 DAC Report on the English Arbitration Bill: The Last Part. Arbitration International, 1999, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 413-433.10.1093/arbitration/15.4.413
THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW. DAC Report on Arbitration Bill 1996 [online]. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com, 1996 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-004-4914?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1>.
The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards concluded on June 10, 1958; order of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs No. 74/1959 Coll., the New York Arbitration Convention.
UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 [online]. uncitral.org, 1985 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/06-54671_Ebook.pdf>.
UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006 [online]. uncitral.org, 2008 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at < http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf>.
VIENNA INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE. Wiener Regeln [online]. viac. eu, 1 June 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.viac.eu/de/schiedsverfahren/wiener-regeln>.
WERNER, Jacques. Intellectual Property Disputes and Arbitration - A Comment on a Recent ICC Report. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 1998, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 841-886.10.1111/j.1747-1796.1998.tb00039.x