Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Party Autonomy in the Procedure of Appointing Arbitrators

Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. ASCHAUER, Christian. Die Besetzung von Schiedsgerichten zwischen Parteiautonomie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit. Austrian Law Journal, 2016, No. 1, pp. 102-108.
  2. BIGHAM, Tom. The Business of Judging. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 434 p.
  3. BORALESSA, Anoosha. The Limitations of Party Autonomy in ICSID Arbitration. American Review of International Arbitration, 2004, Vol. 15, No. 2, 58 p.
  4. BRUCE, Fiona. Case Comment: Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust- Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35 [online]. ukscblog.com, 30 July 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://ukscblog.com/case-comment-ustkamenogorsk-hydropower-plant-jsc-v-aes-ust-kamenogorsk-hydropower-plant-llp-2013-uksc-35>.
  5. CARBONNEAU, Thomas E. The Exercise of Contract Freedom in Making of Arbitration Agreements. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2003, Vol. 36, pp. 1189-1232.
  6. COLLINS, Lawrence (ed.). Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Conflict of Laws, vol 2. 14th edition. London: Sweet&Maxwell, 2010. 1950 p.
  7. DONAHEY, M. Scott. The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators. Journal of International Arbitration, 1992, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 31-42.10.54648/JOIA1992033
  8. English Arbitration Act.
  9. GOTTWALD, Peter, HESS, Burkhard (eds.). Procedural Justice XIV, IAPL World Congress Heidelberg, 2011. Bielfeld: Gieseking-Verlag, 2014. 721 p.
  10. HOFFMANN, Leonard. Changing Perspectives on Civil Litigation. The Modern Law Review, 1993, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 297-306.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02674.x
  11. HOUSE OF LORDS. Judgments - Magill v. Porter Magill v. Weeks [online]. publications. parliament.uk, 13 December 2001 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011213/magill-1.htm>.
  12. HRNČIŘÍKOVÁ, Miluše, VALENTOVÁ, Lucia. Judiciální trendy v mimosoudním řešení přeshraničních sporů. (Judicial Trends in the Out-of-Court Settlements of Cross-border Disputes.) 1st edition. Prague: Leges, 2016. 176 p.
  13. CHATTERJEE, C. The Reality of The Party Autonomy Rule In International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 2003, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 539 - 560.10.54648/JOIA2003046
  14. CHUKWUMERIJE, Okezie. Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration. Quorum Books, 1994. 218 p.10.5040/9798400626029
  15. INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION. International Dispute Resolution Procedures (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules): English [online]. icdr.org, 1 July 2016 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://www.icdr.org/icdr/faces/i_search/i_rule/i_rule_detail?doc=ADRSTAGE2025301&_afrLoop=163277989018227&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=1a4w45rk1n_161#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3D1a4w45rk1n_161%26_afrLoop%3D163277989018227%26doc%3DADRSTAGE2025301%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrlstate%3D1a4w45rk1n_221>.
  16. INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Arbitration Rules [online]. iccwbo. org, 1 March 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/>.
  17. MUSTILL, Michael John. Comments and Conclusions. In Conservatory Provisional Measures in international Arbitration, 9. Joint Colloquim. ICC Publication, 1993, p. 118.
  18. ONYEMA, Emilia. Selection of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration. International Arbitration Law Review, 2005, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 45-54.
  19. PARK, William. Arbitrators and Accuracy. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-53.10.1093/jnlids/idp004
  20. REDFERN, Alan, HUNTER, Martin. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Student Version. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 727 p.
  21. Judgment of the Court of Appeal from 13 December 2001, Magill v. Porter v. Weeks, [2001] UKLH 67.
  22. Judgment of the Court of Appeal from 3 November 1999, Peh Teck Quee v Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale, [2000] 1 SLR 148; [1999] SGCA 79.
  23. Judgment of the Court of Appeal, Smith v Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd, 2006, EWCA civ. 242.
  24. Decision Laker Airways Inc. V. FLS Aerospace Ltd, 2000.
  25. Judgment of the US Supreme Court from 6 March 1995, Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (1995).
  26. SOBICH, Phillip. Die Civil Procedure Rules 1999 - Zivilprozessrecht in England. Juristen Zeitung, 1999, pp. 775 - 780.
  27. The 1996 DAC Report on the English Arbitration Bill: The Last Part. Arbitration International, 1999, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 413-433.10.1093/arbitration/15.4.413
  28. THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW. DAC Report on Arbitration Bill 1996 [online]. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com, 1996 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-004-4914?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1>.
  29. TUFTE-KRISTENSEN, Johan. The Unilateral Appointment of Co-arbitrators. Arbitration International, 2016, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 483-503.10.1093/arbint/aiw024
  30. TWEEDDALE, Andrew, TWEEDDALE, Keren. Arbitration of Commercial Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 1010 p.
  31. The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards concluded on June 10, 1958; order of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs No. 74/1959 Coll., the New York Arbitration Convention.
  32. UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [online]. uncitral.org, 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf>.
  33. UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 [online]. uncitral.org, 1985 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/06-54671_Ebook.pdf>.
  34. UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006 [online]. uncitral.org, 2008 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at < http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf>.
  35. VIENNA INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE. Wiener Regeln [online]. viac. eu, 1 June 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.viac.eu/de/schiedsverfahren/wiener-regeln>.
  36. WERNER, Jacques. Intellectual Property Disputes and Arbitration - A Comment on a Recent ICC Report. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 1998, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 841-886.10.1111/j.1747-1796.1998.tb00039.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 109
Published on: Mar 28, 2018
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2018 Michal Malacka, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.