Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Position of Judicial Officers in the Czech Republic in Comparison with other European Countries Cover

Position of Judicial Officers in the Czech Republic in Comparison with other European Countries

International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 17 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)
By: Petra Juřátková  
Open Access
|Feb 2018

References

  1. A Woman at the Head of the International Union of Judicial Officers [online]. uihj, 5. 6. 2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/a-woman-at-the-head-of-the-international-union-of-judicial-officers_2164395.html>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. About the CEPEJ... [online]. Council of Europe [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/presentation/cepej_en.asp>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. BÁČOVÁ, Petra. Germany lacks judicial officers, courts annually commence more than 6 million enforcements of decision [online]. Ekcr.cz, 18. 11. 2013 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://ekcr.cz/1/aktuality-pro-media/1403-v-nemecku-exekutory-nemaji-tamni-soudy-rocne-zahaji-vice-nez-6-milionu-vykonu-rozhodnuti-18-11-2013?w=>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bill proposal by MP´s Pavel Němec, Pavel Svoboda, Cyril Svoboda, Zdeněk Koudelka, Eva Dundáčková and others of Act on Judicial Officers and Executive Activities (Enforcement Code) and on amendment and supplementation of other acts / parliamentary document 725 / – second reading [online]. House of Representatives of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, 24. 1. 2001 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.psp.cz/eknih/1998ps/stenprot/032schuz/s032049.htm#r8>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. CEPEJ means The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. The CEPEJ is made up of representatives of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe. Its aim is the improvement of the efficiency and functioning of justice in the member States, and the development of the implementation of the instruments adopted by the Council of Europe – See What are the objectives of the CEPEJ? [online]. Council of Europe [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/presentation/CEPEJ_depliant_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Constitutional Court judgment of 6. 9. 2016, Ref. No. IV. US 378/16.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Document of the Chamber 725/0. Draft Bill on Judicial Officers [online]. House of Representatives of the Parliament of the Czech Republic [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?o=3&ct=725&ct1=0>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Explanatory note to Act No. 396/2012 Sb. [online]. House of Representatives of the Parliament of the Czech Republic [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/orig2.sqw?idd=76211&pdf=1>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. FLAM, Jiří. Nezávislost soudního exekutora a jeho odměna. Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 2, p. 15–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. HOZMAN, David. Konference k 15. výročí Exekutorské komory ČR. Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 4, p. 18–21.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. CHARDON, Mathieu. CEPEJ Directive in the French law. Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 4, p. 36–38.10.5553/EELC/187791072016001001013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 25. 8. 2004, ref. No. 20 Cdo 1232/2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 31. 8. 2004, ref. No. II. ÚS 150/04.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2. 3. 2006, ref. No. II. ÚS 9/06.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Judgement of the Constitutional Court of 27. 11. 2007 ref. No. II. ÚS 1331/07.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 14. 10. 2016, ref No. 20 Cdo 3953/2016, and herein quoted judgements.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. JUŘÁTKOVÁ, Petra. Uplatnění nákladů exekuce v insolvenčním řízení. Bulletin advokacie, roč. 2017, č. 1–2, s. 25–29.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. LEYSHON, Martin. Mimoexekuční činnost soudních exekutorů v Anglii a Walesu. Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 4, p. 57–58.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Místní příslušnost soudních exekutorů funguje v celé Evropské unii [online]. Platforma za teritorialitu soudních exekutorů, 19. 11. 2014 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://teritorialita.webnode.cz/news/mistni-prislusnost-soudnich-exekutorufunguje-v-cele-evropske-unii/>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. NETTEN, Leo. About the CEPEJ. Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 4, p. 31–32; CEPEJ(2009)11REV2 – Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing council of Europe’s recommendation on enforcement adopted by the CEPEJ at its 14th plenary meeting (Strasbourg, 9–10 December 2009) [online]. Council of Europe [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=1565277&Site=&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC679&direct=true.&direct=true>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. (Ne)zavedení teritoriality v České republice [online]. Komorní noviny, 20. 10. 2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.kn.cz/clanek/nezavedeni-teritoriality-vceske-republice>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Novela zlikviduje konkurenci mezi soudními exekutory a sníží vymahatelnost pohledávek [online]. Státní správa, 2. 7. 2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.statnisprava.cz/rstsp/clanky.nsf/i/novela_zlikviduje_konkurenci_mezi_soudnimi_exekutory_a_snizi_vymahatelnost_pohledavek_15070111_98702983>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Odchody exekutorů pokračují, minulý týden rezignoval již 11. exekutor v tomto roce [online]. Ekcr.cz [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://ekcr.cz/1/aktuality-pro-media/2208-odchody-exekutoru-pokracuji-minuly-tyden-rezignoval-jiz-11-exekutor-v-tomto-roce?w=>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Opinion of the Civil Law and Commercial Collegium of the Supreme Court of 15. 2. 2006, Cpjn 200/2005, published under No. 31/2006 Collection of Court Decisions and Opinions.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Opinion of the Constitutional Court of 12. 9. 2006, ref. No. Pl. ÚS – st. 23/06.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. PALLER, Miroslav. 20. výročie existencie slovenskej komory exekútorov. Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 4, p.. 76–78.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Parliamentary document 725/0. Draft Bill on Judicial Officers [online]. House of Representatives of the Parliament of the Czech Republic [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?o=3&ct=725&ct1=0>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Podkonický zvolen do Výboru Mezinárodní unie soudních exekutorů [online]. vz24.cz, 10. 5. 2012 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.vz24.cz/clanky/podkonicky-zvolen-do-vyboru-mezinarodni-unie-soudnich-exekutoru/>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Regulations of the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic No. 288/1995 Coll., on Remuneration and Compensations for Judicial Officers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. SAHULA, David. Dramaticky roste počet dlužníků s více exekucemi. Čtyři a více exekucí již má 380 tisíc lidí [online]. Právní prostor, 8. 10. 2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.pravniprostor.cz/aktuality/aktuality/dramaticky-roste-pocet-dluzniku-s-vice-exekucemi-ctyri-a-vice-exekuci-jiz-ma-380-tisic-lidi>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. SICKLINGER, Stephan. Das neue tschechische Insolvenzrecht aus der Sicht des deutschen Gläubigers. Sipplingen: JWV Jenaer Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2009, p. 27.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. ŠEDIVÝ, Jiří. Čeští exekutoři nikterak nevyčnívají [online]. Peníze.cz [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.penize.cz/17493-cesti-exekutori-nikterak-nevycnivaji>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Supreme Court judgement of 23. 10. 2014, Ref. No. 21 Cdo 3182/2014, published under No. 32/2015 Collections judgments and opinions.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Territorial jurisdiction of judicial officers applies throughout the whole European Union [online]. Platforma za teritorialitu soudních exekutorů, 19. 11. 2014 [quoted on 31. 1. 2016]. Available at <http://teritorialita.webnode.cz/news/mistni-prislusnost-soudnich-exekutoru-funguje-v-cele-evropske-unii/>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. The Judicial Officer in the World – Belgium [online]. Uihj.cz, 10. 11.2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/ressources/21650/87/belgium_-_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. The Judicial Officer in the World – France [online]. Uihj.cz, 10. 11.2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/ressources/10148/54/france_-_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. The Judicial Officer in the World – Germany [online]. Uihj.cz, 10. 11.2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/ressources/21650/84/germany_-_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. The Judicial Officer in the World – Hungary [online]. Uihj.cz, 10. 11.2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/ressources/10148/50/hungary_-_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. The Judicial Officer in the World – Netherlands [online]. Uihj.cz, 10. 11.2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/ressources/10148/86/netherlands_-_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. The Judicial Officer in the World – Slovakia [online]. Uihj.cz, 10. 11.2015 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.uihj.com/en/ressources/10148/78/slovakia_-_en.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. UITDEHAAG, Jop. Budoucnost soudního exekutora. . Komorní listy, 2016, vol. 8, No. 4, p. 43–46.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Vymáhání pohledávek v Rakousku [online]. Business info, 18. 11. 2011 [cit. 29. 1. 2017]. Dostupné na <http://www.businessinfo.cz/cs/clanky/vymahani-pohledavek-v-rakousku-372.html>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Závěrečná analýza systémových chyb na poli exekucí [online]. Iuridicum Remedium, o. s., 2012 [quoted on 29. 1. 2017]. Available at <http://www.osf.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/IuRe_Zaverecna_analyza_systemovych_chyb_na_polic_exekuci_cervenec_2012.pdf>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 223 - 237
Published on: Feb 9, 2018
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
judicial officer,
court execution,
Enforcement Code,
Code of Civil Procedure
Related subjects:
Law,
International law, foreign law, comparative law,
International law, foreign law, comparative law, other,
European law,
European law, other,
Public law,
Constitutional jurisdiction, administrative procedural law

© 2018 Petra Juřátková, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)Next article