Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of the Consumer Knowledge and Attitude toward Innovations in the Fashion Industry Cover

Analysis of the Consumer Knowledge and Attitude toward Innovations in the Fashion Industry

Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173.10.1007/BF02294170
  2. Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590
  3. Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590
  4. Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590
  5. Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590
  6. Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590
  7. Bainbridge, S. W. (2002). Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4. 561-570.
  8. Batista, L., & Ng. I. (2012). The emergence of relationship-based retailing-a perspective from the fashion sector. Oxford Retail Futures Conference - New Technologies, Business Models and Customer Experience. Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/60849/ Accessed 05 April 2019.
  9. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  10. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.2382320703
  11. Berry, L. L., Bolton, R. N., Bridges, C. H., Meyer, J., Parasuraman, A., & Seiders, K. (2010). Opportunities for innovation in the delivery of interactive retail services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(2), 155-167.10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.001
  12. Bredahl, J. L., (2001). Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions with Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey. Journal of Consumer Policy. 24.10.1023/A:1010950406128
  13. Brown, J., Fatehi, L., & Kuzma, J. (2015). Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 122.10.1007/s11051-015-2926-4
  14. Capon, A., Gillespie, J., Rolfe, M., & Smith, W. (2015). Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups. Journal of nanoparticle research: an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology, 17(8), 327.10.1007/s11051-015-3129-8451807626246798
  15. Chen, M., Lin, Y., & Cheng, T. (2013). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan. Technovation, 33(s 2-3), 88–96.10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008
  16. Cobb, D. M. & Macoubrier, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6, 385-405.10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4
  17. D’Silva, J., & Bowman, D.M (2010) To label or not to label? It’s more than a Nano-sized question. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4, 420–427.10.1017/S1867299X00000891
  18. European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer 73.1 Biotechnology Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf Accessed 10 April 2019.
  19. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley.
  20. Goldsmith, R. E., Moore, M. A., & Beaudoin, P. (1999). Fashion innovativeness and self-concept: a replication”. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(1), 7-18.10.1108/10610429910257904
  21. Hung, S.C, & Chu, Y.Y. (2006). Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector. Technovation, 26 (1), 104-110.10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.018
  22. Kline, R.B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, Fourth Edition. The Guilford Press: New York.
  23. National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/special Accessed 08 April 2019.
  24. Nerlich, B. D., Clarke. D., & Ulph, F. (2007). Risks and benefits of nanotechnology: How young adults perceive possible advances in nanomedicine compared with conventional treatments. Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 159-171.10.1080/13698570701306856
  25. R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  26. URL: https://www.r-project.org/
  27. Renn, O., & Rocco, M.C. (2006). Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(2), 153-191.10.1007/s11051-006-9092-7
  28. Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/Version=1.8.12.
  29. Scheufele, D., & Lewenstein, B. (2005). The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 659-667.10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
  30. Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590
  31. Srinivasan, K., Rajanikumar, K., Sheetal, B. K., Lalitha, K. B, & Murthy, C. (2018). Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Current Trends Fashion Technology and Textile Engineering, (3).
  32. Tomarken, A. & Waller, G.N. (2005). Structural Equation Modelling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions. Annual review of clinical psychology. 1. 31-65.10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.14423917716081
  33. Trott, P. (2008). Innovation Management and New Product Development. 3rd edition. Pearson Education.
  34. Tzou, R., & Lu, H. (2009). Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 311-322.10.1080/01449290701763454
  35. Vargas, M. (2016). Structural Equation Modelling in R (Part 1). Retrieved from R-bloggers: https://www.r-bloggers.com/structural-equation-modelling-in-r-part-1.
  36. Yves, R. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
  37. URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v048i02.
Language: English
Page range: 407 - 418
Published on: Feb 13, 2020
Published by: Grupul de Econometrie Aplicata
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Andreea-Ionela Puiu, published by Grupul de Econometrie Aplicata
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.