Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Do Verbal Meanings Have a Radial Organization? Cover

Do Verbal Meanings Have a Radial Organization?

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Bárczi, Géza and Országh, László, eds. A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára [The Explicatory Dictionary of Hungarian Language]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1959–1962.
  2. Coleman, Linda and Kay, Paul. “Prototype semantics. The English word lie.” Linguistics, vol. 57, no. 1, 1981, pp. 26–44.10.1353/lan.1981.0002
  3. Croft, William. “Connecting frames and constructions. A case study of eat and feed.” Constructions and Frames, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 7‒28.10.1075/cf.1.1.02cro
  4. Croft, William and Cruse, D. Alan. Cognitive linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
  5. Croft, William. Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
  6. Dimény, Hajnalka. “Sound symbolism and meaning patterns.” Roczniki Humanistyczne, vol. 66, no. 11, 2018, pp. 47–57.10.18290/rh.2018.66.11-3
  7. Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark. “Polysemy and conceptual blending.” In Nerlich, Brigitte, Todd, Zazie and Clarke, David D., eds. Polysemy. Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, pp. 79–94.
  8. Fellbaum, Christiane. “English Verbs as a Semantic Net.” International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 3, no. 4, 1990, pp. 278–301.10.1093/ijl/3.4.278
  9. Gentner, Dedre and France, Ilene M. “The verb mutability effect. Studies of the combinatorial semantics of nouns and verbs.” In Small, Steven, Cottrell, Garrison and Tananhaus, Michael, eds. Lexical ambiguity resolution. Perspective from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988, pp. 343–382.10.1016/B978-0-08-051013-2.50018-5
  10. Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
  11. Jaggar, Philip J. and Buba, Malami. “Metaphorical extensions of ‘eat’ ⇒ [overcome] and ‘drink’ ⇒ [undergo] in Hausa”. In Newman, John, ed. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009, pp. 229–252.10.1075/tsl.84.11jag
  12. Lakoff, George. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
  13. Newman, John. “Eating and drinking as sources of metaphor in English.” International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 6, no. 2, 1997, pp. 213–231.
  14. Newman, John. “A cross-linguistic overview of ’eat’ and ’drink’”. In Newman, John, ed. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009a, pp. 1–26.10.1075/tsl.84.02new
  15. Newman, John, ed. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009b.
  16. Oravecz, Csaba, Váradi, Tamás and Sass, Bálint. “The Hungarian National Gigaword Corpus.” Proceedings of LREC 2014 (MNSZ), 2014.
  17. Pusztai, Ferenc. Magyar értelmező kéziszótár [Hungarian Explicative Dictionary]. Second, extended edition. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2006.
  18. Radden, Günter. “Motion metaphorized: The case of coming and going.” In Casad, Eugen H. ed. Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods. Part 1. Berlin‒New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 423‒458.
  19. Raukko, Jarno. “Polysemy as flexible meanings: experiments with English get and Finnish pitaa.” In Nerlich, Birigitte, Todd, Zazie and Clarke, David D., eds. Polysemy. Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, pp. 161–194.
  20. Rosch, Eleanor. “Principles of Categorization.” In Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara, eds. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978, pp. 27–48.
  21. Rosch, Eleanor and Mervis, Carolyn B. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, no. 7, 1975, pp. 573–605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
  22. Szilágyi N., Sándor. “Hangulatfestés – de mit is festünk?” [Sound symbolism – but what does it symbolize?] In Kádár, Edit and Szilágyi N., Sándor, eds. Motiváltság és nyelvi ikonicitás [Motivation and iconicity in language]. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület, 2015, pp. 23‒42.
  23. Szilágyi N., Sándor. Hogyan teremtsünk világot. Rávezetés a nyelvi világ vizsgálatára [How to create a world. Introduction to the study of worlds through language]. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Tankönyvtanács, 1996.
Language: English
Page range: 122 - 146
Published on: Dec 23, 2021
Published by: Babeș-Bolyai University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Hajnalka Dimény, published by Babeș-Bolyai University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.