Type distribution for male local preachers compared with male Methodist circuit ministers reported by Burton, Francis and Robbins (2010)
| The sixteen complete types | Dichotomous preferences | ||||||
| ISTJ | ISFJ | INFJ | INTJ | E | n = 35 | (43.8%) | I = 1.11 |
| n = 15 | n = 16 | n = 2 | n = 7 | I | n = 45 | (56.3%) | I = 0.93 |
| (18.8%) | (20.0%) | (2.5%) | (8.8%) | ||||
| I = 1.64 | I = 1.09 | I = 0.31 | I = 1.08 | S | n = 58 | (72.5%) | I = 1.34** |
| +++++ | +++++ | +++ | +++++ | N | n = 22 | (27.5%) | I = 0.60** |
| +++++ | +++++ | ++++ | |||||
| +++++ | +++++ | T | n = 41 | (51.3%) | I = 1.44** | ||
| ++++ | +++++ | F | n = 39 | (48.8%) | I = 0.76** | ||
| J | n = 68 | (85.0%) | I = 1.21** | ||||
| P | n = 12 | (15.0%) | I = 0.50** | ||||
| ISTP | ISFP | INFP | INTP | ||||
| n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 1 | n = 4 | Pairs and temperaments | |||
| (0.0%) | (0.0%) | (1.3%) | (5.0%) | IJ | n = 40 | (50.0%) | I = 1.09 |
| I = 0.00 | I = 0.00 | I = 0.17* | I = 1.58 | IP | n = 5 | (6.3%) | I = 0.43* |
| + | +++++ | EP | n = 7 | (8.8%) | I = 0.57 | ||
| EJ | n = 28 | (35.0%) | I = 1.45* | ||||
| ST | n = 27 | (33.8%) | I = 1.86*** | ||||
| SF | n = 31 | (38.8%) | I = 1.07 | ||||
| NF | n = 8 | (10.0%) | I = 0.35*** | ||||
| ESTP | ESFP | ENFP | ENTP | NT | n = 14 | (17.5%) | I = 1.00 |
| n = 1 | n = 2 | n = 2 | n = 2 | ||||
| (1.3%) | (2.5%) | (2.5%) | (2.5%) | SJ | n = 55 | (68.8%) | I = 1.55*** |
| I = 1.24 | I = 0.51 | I = 0.35 | I = 1.08 | SP | n = 3 | (3.8%) | I = 0.38 |
| + | +++ | +++ | +++ | NP | n = 9 | (11.3%) | I = 0.56 |
| NJ | n = 13 | (16.3%) | I = 0.64 | ||||
| TJ | n = 34 | (42.5%) | I = 1.50** | ||||
| TP | n = 7 | (8.8%) | I = 1.21 | ||||
| FP | n = 5 | (6.3%) | I = 0.27*** | ||||
| FJ | n = 34 | (42.5%) | I = 1.02 | ||||
| ESTJ | ESFJ | ENFJ | ENTJ | ||||
| n = 11 | n = 13 | n = 3 | n = 1 | IN | n = 14 | (17.5%) | I = 0.65 |
| (13.8%) | (16.3%) | (3.8%) | (1.3%) | EN | n = 8 | (10.0%) | I = 0.53* |
| I = 2.72** | I = 1.68 | I = 0.68 | I = 0.32 | IS | n = 31 | (38.8%) | I = 1.15 |
| +++++ | +++++ | ++++ | + | ES | n = 27 | (33.8%) | I = 1.64** |
| +++++ | +++++ | ||||||
| ++++ | +++++ | ET | n = 15 | (18.8%) | I = 1.53 | ||
| + | EF | n = 20 | (25.0%) | I = 0.92 | |||
| IF | n = 19 | (23.8%) | I = 0.64* | ||||
| IT | n = 26 | (32.5%) | I = 1.39 | ||||
Type distribution for female local preachers compared with female Methodist circuit ministers reported by Burton, Francis and Robbins (2010)
| The sixteen complete types | Dichotomous preferences | ||||||
| ISTJ | ISFJ | INFJ | INTJ | E | n = 31 | (50.0%) | I = 1.07 |
| n = 6 | n = 16 | n = 7 | n = 2 | I | n = 31 | (50.0%) | I = 0.94 |
| (9.7%) | (25.8%) | (11.3%) | (3.2%) | ||||
| I = 2.01 | I = 1.34 | I = 1.21 | I = 0.84 | S | n = 43 | (69.4%) | I = 1.33** |
| +++++ | +++++ | +++++ | +++ | N | n = 19 | (30.6%) | I = 0.64** |
| +++++ | +++++ | +++++ | |||||
| +++++ | + | T | n = 17 | (27.4%) | I = 1.20 | ||
| +++++ | F | n = 45 | (72.6%) | I = 0.94 | |||
| +++++ | |||||||
| + | J | n = 56 | (90.3%) | I = 1.30*** | |||
| P | n = 6 | (9.7%) | I = 0.32*** | ||||
| ISTP | ISFP | INFP | INTP | ||||
| n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 0 | Pairs and temperaments | |||
| (0.0%) | (0.0%) | (0.0%) | (0.0%) | IJ | n = 31 | (50.0%) | I = 1.34 |
| I = 0.00 | I = 0.00 | I = 0.00** | I = 0.00 | IP | n = 0 | (0.0%) | I = 0.00*** |
| EP | n = 6 | (9.7%) | I = 0.65 | ||||
| EJ | n = 25 | (40.3%) | I = 1.25 | ||||
| ST | n = 12 | (19.4%) | I = 1.72 | ||||
| SF | n = 31 | (50.0%) | I = 1.22 | ||||
| NF | n = 14 | (22.6%) | I = 0.62* | ||||
| ESTP | ESFP | ENFP | ENTP | NT | n = 5 | (8.1%) | I = 0.70 |
| n = | n = 2 | n = 3 | n = 1 | ||||
| (0.0%) | (3.2%) | (4.8%) | (1.6%) | SJ | n = 41 | (66.1%) | I = 1.52*** |
| I = 0.00 | I = 0.72 | I = 0.65 | I = 0.84 | SP | n = 2 | (3.2%) | I = 0.37 |
| +++ | +++++ | ++ | NP | n = 4 | (6.5%) | I = 0.30** | |
| NJ | n = 15 | (24.2%) | I = 0.93 | ||||
| TJ | n = 16 | (25.8%) | I = 1.61 | ||||
| TP | n = 1 | (1.6%) | I = 0.24 | ||||
| FP | n = 5 | (8.1%) | I = 0.34** | ||||
| FJ | n = 40 | (64.5%) | I = 1.21 | ||||
| ESTJ | ESFJ | ENFJ | ENTJ | ||||
| n = 6 | n = 13 | n = 4 | n = 2 | IN | n = 9 | (14.5%) | I = 0.56 |
| (9.7%) | (21.0%) | (6.5%) | (3.2%) | EN | n = 10 | (16.1%) | I = 0.73 |
| I = 2.01 | I = 1.45 | I = 0.63 | I = 1.25 | IS | n = 22 | (35.5%) | I = 1.30 |
| +++++ | +++++ | +++++ | +++ | ES | n = 21 | (33.9%) | I = 1.37 |
| +++++ | +++++ | ++ | |||||
| +++++ | ET | n = 9 | (14.5%) | I = 1.41 | |||
| +++++ | EF | n = 22 | (35.5%) | I = 0.97 | |||
| + | IF | n = 23 | (37.1%) | I = 0.92 | |||
| IT | n = 8 | (12.9%) | I = 1.03 | ||||
Psychological type and temperament profiles of Methodist ministers and Church of England clergy
| Clergymen | Clergywomen | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C of E1 | Methodist2 | C of E3 | Methodist4 | |
| Psychological type | ||||
| Introversion (I) | 57 | 61 | 54 | 53 |
| Intuition (N) | 62 | 46** | 65 | 48*** |
| Feeling (F) | 54 | 64*** | 74 | 77 |
| Judging (J) | 68 | 70 | 65 | 70 |
| Psychological temperament | ||||
| Epimethean (SJ) | 31 | 44*** | 29 | 43*** |
| Dionysian (SP) | 7 | 10 | 6 | 9 |
| Promethean (NT) | 27 | 18*** | 15 | 12 |
| Apollonian (NF) | 35 | 28** | 50 | 36** |